It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Utah officers heard mysterious voice that led them to infant who survived for 14 hours after car cra

page: 6
76
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: OneNationUnder

I would hope that if it had OnStar the vehicle would not have sat in the river for 14 hours. That was a joke right?




posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Interesting that you think they lied despite them being Mormons (assuming they are even Mormons).

What are you suggesting here?..


BTW Utah is not mostly Mormons. It's about half.

Utah is 60+%. Salt Lake City is 50+%



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Jaellma

ha ha ha...skeptics..wow

I am convinced these people are just trolling.


It's not a reasonable position to wait for the medical examiners findings. We should all just not be skeptics, believe it was the voice of a ghost, on little information and wholly lacking evidence to support that claim. How dare they question and doubt. To do so is trolling! Hear, hear!



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Memenquay

Its amazing how people just think of arguments to deny the possibility that it could be something paranormal.


Arguing does not equal dismissing the possibility. It's possible, sure. Why do those who believe it was a ghost in this thread think everyone else should believe without deliberation?? Why can't we discuss the details and explore all viewpoints and other possible explanations. I swear. What you all advocate isn't belief. It's blind belief. You assume we are denying the possibility of it being paranormal, and ironically you, and others, appear to be dismissing the possibility it isn't paranormal in nature!



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Lucid Lunacy



What are you suggesting here?..


What do you mean? He thinks that they lied because they are Mormons not me.



Utah is 60+%. Salt Lake City is 50+%


Yes that's what I said. It's about half.



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Lucid Lunacy

They are talking about the attitudes some posters have.

"I don't believe in ghosts so therefore they lied and that's that!"

It's akin to Christians' argument:

"I believe in demons not aliens so therefore those UFOs are demons not aliens and that's that!"



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:46 PM
link   
No. They reported the car crash the day before the infant was found in the local paper. They knew where the car was. I read the original story in my local news feed. I live just north of there in Salt Lake



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:54 PM
link   
a reply to: calstorm

That makes no sense. Wouldn't the be there on that day? Need source.



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 10:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: calstorm

That makes no sense. Wouldn't the be there on that day? Need source.


Yeah I am kind of freaking out because I can't find the original article. I read the article in the Dessert News.

www.deseretnews.com... Maybe some one else can find it on this site. I am totally creeped out now. It would ave been the day of the accident.



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 11:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Agree to disagree Deaf Alien. That is not my assessment of their sentiments.


What do you mean? He thinks that they lied because they are Mormons not me.

Then I misread that. My bad.
edit on 12-3-2015 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 12 2015 @ 11:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Lucid Lunacy

I am not dismissing skeptics' posts here, just those with the attitude that people are stupid to believe this.

A few skeptics did bring good points though. For example it could have been the baby yelping. Even I myself said it could have been the wind.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 09:23 PM
link   
a reply to: calstorm

Here is the body cam video of the rescue of Baby Lily VIDEO LINK

Just Wow.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:14 PM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

That is amazing! However I don't believe it was the mother the officers heard.



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:24 PM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

There will be more pictures and videos coming.

Now what skeptics?



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:41 PM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

My ex wife used to take care of hospice patients and one night she called and said she would be late a woman had asked her to stay with her at the end. My ex returned home after this woman had passed and we went about our regular life schedule. That night I woke up and witnessed a gray figure of a old lady in a hospital gown standing on my ex's side of the bed. I said out loud oh my and my ex said.....You can see her to....I replied yes. At this point my ex said OK Ruth you can go to heaven now and she flat out vanished.



There is life after death.....It is real. It is one of those things you never really believe until....Well you do. This voice was the mother protecting her child even after death......One heck of a mom......Sad this is.
edit on 13-3-2015 by SubTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 13 2015 @ 11:49 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

So fill us in here. What is it you think these first responders heard then if not the child's mother?



posted on Mar, 14 2015 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

Dead men ( in this case women ) tell no tales.
Most likely this kids number wasn't up. And I first
want to acknowledge how bitchen I think that is
because, she is without doubt the prettiest lil baby I've
ever seen. So guardian angel or the little girls sub conscious
was reaching out some how. Not sure really, but the dead do not
speak, that I'm sure of. I believe the cops heard what they say they
heard tho.
edit on Ram31415v58201500000024 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 14 2015 @ 01:44 AM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

So what I am guessing since you do not come right out and just say it is that you have a specific religious belief that precludes someone being able to communicate with the living once they are considered deceased? Is that summation correct or am I mistaken?



posted on Mar, 14 2015 @ 02:25 AM
link   
a reply to: machineintelligence

I'm not religious at all. But I do believe certain things about death
according to scripture. For one, just as I stated, the dead do not talk
to the living. At all! Ever! Because they are dead. That's what being dead
means. Only other person in that car that was alive?
edit on Ram31415v29201500000035 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 14 2015 @ 02:42 AM
link   
a reply to: randyvs



I'm not religious at all. But I do believe certain things about death according to scripture.


I don't think you understand what being religious means? You believe things according to scripture so therefore you are religious.




top topics



 
76
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join