It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


If you wanted a one world order how would you go about create a global government?

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 04:38 PM
a reply to: SubTruth

How do you sucker a country into going along with the elite's many agendas?

With goodies(bread and circus) and cleverly executed fake moral altruism.

posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 04:40 PM
a reply to: John_Rodger_Cornman

It might happen after a near extinction level event or a global war..
when people realise the end nearly happened.. then.. then they might see
a higher bar than tribalism..
2 cents

posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 04:47 PM
Oh yeah it could be done. It was the basis of Foundation by Isaac Asimov also.

So you look at the UN and what's wrong there. Too complicated to elitist. The Security Council? Not needed.

You do it sort of like the United States. Every country is a state. Every country gets 2 representatives, like in the Senate. Every country also gets a number of votes based on population...sort of like the house of representatives. There is a World Court and a president for a term of 2 years. It's short so that he has to get stuff done. No second terms so he never has to worry about re-election. Same with the world house and senate. No second terms so they do the work and never have to worry about relection. How each member state or country votes or elects or chooses their senate and house people is up to them. You could have a state like North Korea that doesn't have elections and appoints it's people from the Military. The world order doesn't care that's your business.

How would it start?

It could start with a couple of countries. Like Denmark, Mexico, Brazil, Iceland and Uganda. They keep accepting new member states until they have most of the world in there. Even if US, China and Russia refussed to Join. there wold be a power block of over 100 or 170 countries. That's real power.

They have an army and some laws about nukes and wars and pollution and some taxes.. they have a relief fund for natural disasters and food and medical attention and that's about it.

It would work better than what we have now which .. is the elite in Russia, US, UK, France, China, Germany, Saudi Arabia and a few others rule the world behind closed doors.

posted on Apr, 2 2015 @ 08:46 PM
a reply to: John_Rodger_Cornmanexactly, there probably other ways. for sure force is not one especially a country is big for example the USA.

posted on Apr, 7 2015 @ 02:04 PM
a reply to: amazing

Good point.

It would function like a republic. Good ideas.

posted on Apr, 7 2015 @ 03:36 PM

originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
a reply to: amazing

Good point.

It would function like a republic. Good ideas.

I think that's the only way it would work. Countries could opt out of course, but the world federation, power would well, have power.

posted on Apr, 10 2015 @ 09:20 AM
a reply to: John_Rodger_Cornman

They certainly don't need my help. I'm sure they're well on their way. Technically, we're probably already there. They just need to take off all the different uniforms and masks. They're all basically the same guy behind whatever mask is most acceptable for their country.

posted on Apr, 10 2015 @ 09:31 AM
The reality is, we already have one supreme ruler and source of power . . . MONEY . . . and ever so gradually, that supreme rule and source of power is being consolidated into fewer and fewer hands while the majority of us sit idly by giving focus to dumb-assed self-entertainment type stuff (television, social media, etc.) that really doesn't matter while they continue on their mission.

Eventually, those considered to be The Powers That Be will be few, with their well-armed minions to keep the rest of us at bay and forever under their thumbs.

The gig's already up and the new order is in place . . . most of us are just too stupid or disinterested to care.

posted on Apr, 10 2015 @ 10:07 AM
IMO The system is already in place. We already have one world government. It is just not for public consumption yet.

Why is it not for public consumption?
The true "rulers" and elite know that the system and many people are going to die. The true rulers and elite are sure as h*ll not going to take the blame for the disaster that true rulers, elites, socialists, job seekers, and borrowers created. They all need somebody to blame, a patsy. He will have to be a very specific type of person to be accepted by all religions and people. Set the patsy up as the new leader of a dying system and then blame him when the SHTF. In the ensuing chaos, people will accept anything so reveal that already existing one world gov't to the public.

Sadly for them, it doesn't work if they don't have their special patsy. System dies and there is nothing to replace it.

posted on Apr, 10 2015 @ 10:21 AM
Remove ALL and every religious
system within the leadership/gvmt.

Exlude U.S, RU, China, Israel from the
positions within the leadership.

And ALL other that cant talk in a civilised
manor or behave like a human being will
be exluded.

Set up a system that PROTECT the ppl, not
corporations. A corporation IS NOT a person.
The person is a legal rep but NOT the

The monatary system should as soon as possible
be dissmantled. Energy research should be a

Aid and Help to groups or "regions" should be
done AT LOCATION of need.

And so on and so on....

Easy, but as allways. 7billion ppl with 7billion
ideas and needs...

posted on Apr, 10 2015 @ 10:33 AM




posted on Apr, 12 2015 @ 12:58 AM
Actually, I'm kind of starting to question whether or not this "one world government" thing would even be in their best interest. How would they create the conflict they need to stimulate "debate" and competitive behavior if they decide they're not going to have enemies anymore?

Or, more disturbing, you have to wonder what they'd substitute for their current enemies. You know they'd still have to have something to be fighting (like a war on drugs or something) to keep manipulating the public.

I just wonder. What would be a convenient enemy for a one world government? "Mental illness", perhaps? Oh, you know. Those "crazy" people who don't go with the flow. Always getting in the way and impeding "progress". "Obstructionists" "Partisans". Hey. That sounds plausible.
edit on 12-4-2015 by BrianFlanders because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 12 2015 @ 06:54 AM
You seek a new enemy...
How about your own STUPIDITY

posted on Apr, 12 2015 @ 07:27 AM
It would need a powerful fascist state- that could kill todays fiat currencies and replace it with a digital currience- bomb all the indepentant countries and rebuild it- replace all the religions with one true religion.. and have a secret police who spies on every one and eliminate anyone who is againts the state..and no middle class just 1% who ows everything

rewrite history, brainwash kids in school and use TV as propaganda and split family values

then 1 world army like UN

so the end would be 1 currience- 1 religion - 1 goverment

posted on Apr, 12 2015 @ 07:29 AM
First of all, let people learn to live together, if they want to fight each other, let em. Not saying prevent asylum, not at all, quite the opposite, keep those doors open.

But, 1) stop meddling in affairs of other people, 2) if two countries want to fight, let em, to the death, its the sure way to let em learn (stop pandering to Israel et al., Ukraine etc), 3) Remove all your NATO / whatever bases from other countries, we know why they're there, quit lying to us.

Funny how I never hear of Jamaica or Iceland at war. Why is that?

The sooner somebody gives the Yanks a bloody nose, the better, frankly.

Stop meddling in the affairs of the EU, let the EU run their own. Quit poking the bear.

Russia is building 5000 shelters in Moscow alone, for their residents, what is America/Britain etc doing for their residents? Sweet feck all, no reason to be patriotic there.

The British Empire caused the problem in Israel when they took Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, then split it in two via the UN BY FORCE.

We know who causes the problems in the world, it always seems to lead back to America/Britain etc.

edit on 12-4-2015 by bullcat because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 04:09 PM
a reply to: John_Rodger_Cornman
People or Power create governments.
A one world government would require the People being alinged or a Power taking Control.

Power route doesn't interest me but eniditibily the People will have Power to responsible over.

If I knew how to win over the people I would do it. I feel its got something to do with enlightening and showing a better path.

posted on Apr, 17 2015 @ 04:31 PM
Fake alien invasion using laser weapons aimed from space.
Toast a few world capitals and then suddenly we find that our "scientists" can "translate" their communication.

That communication is a bunch of messages that basically prove religions are a sham and are constructed by man and some other piece of info that scares the sh## out of everyone and we all join forces and have a giant orgy.

posted on Apr, 22 2015 @ 04:15 AM
call upon lucifer and give him his powers back

posted on Apr, 22 2015 @ 08:04 AM
Do what Cops do with all murders...
Follow the Money

posted on Apr, 22 2015 @ 12:01 PM
Take out any country who you know is going to be a problem. Set up a police state world-wide so when the home grown anti new world order crowd gets out of hand, you crush it. Sneak in legislature under the radar and keep taking away the old rights and implementing draconian new ones. Get people to fight amongst themselves so they have no time to critically think about what is really going on. I think they are ahead of schedule.
edit on 22-4-2015 by LOSTinAMERICA because: (no reason given)

top topics

<< 1  2   >>

log in