It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New mars pictures from ISRO mars orbiter

page: 2
18
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 03:59 PM
link   
It's just some dark rock / sand.



If there were a volcanic eruption, the plume would catch the Sun's light and be much more visible.




posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 04:16 PM
link   
Here's the same area from the MRO:



From here

blogs.agu.org...

You can see all the same features are there, just lit differently.
edit on 8-3-2015 by onebigmonkey because: clarification



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: warthog911
That is Oudmens "crater". The diameter is approx 66 miles. The plume apears to be about 28 to 30 miles wide.

Ancient volcano, or, Nuclear explosion, who knows???


+3 more 
posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 05:33 PM
link   
Same crater, 3 different probes.



No smoke plume, just differences in camera resolution and lighting.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 05:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
Same crater, 3 different probes.



No smoke plume, just differences in camera resolution and lighting.
What are the dates of your photos?



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

I have no idea, but you can make out common features in all the images, and there is no cloud. The orange one is Viking, the other MRO.

Search for images of Oudemans crater - there are plenty.



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 04:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
Same crater, 3 different probes.



No smoke plume, just differences in camera resolution and lighting.
What are the dates of your photos?

From left to right:

1) from MARCI camera on MRO spacecraft. Image date unknown, but the spacecraft has been in orbit around Mars from March 2006, and the picture was created by December 2008, so the original imagery must have been taken in that time period. blogs.agu.org...

2) from the Viking orbiter, image taken some time between 1976 and 1980. photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

3) the ISRO image that was taken recently (perhaps a few days or weeks ago).

It's really funny (and depressing at the same time) how various media outlets have taken the "mushroom cloud" theory and ran with it... www.dnaindia.com...

People will believe anything if it sounds exciting enough.

[Edit] Here's the same area seen from much further away: www.spaceflight101.com...

It's just some dark rock or sand, people! A real cloud or smoke plume of that size would disperse to a bigger size and be visible in telescopes, especially as Mars rotates and would eventually show it sideways.

[Another edit] It took me a while to even see the resemblance to a mushroom cloud, until I came across this article: www.inquisitr.com...
It's really, really strange how people don't understand that, given the almost top-down view in that image, a mushroom cloud wouldn't have appeared on its side like in photos of nuclear explosions given for the comparison. Mushroom clouds don't lie horizontally on theis side, they rise vertically. A mushroom cloud in that ISRO image woudl have appeared as a large fluffy disc, obsuring the crater beneath is, and also catching some of the Sun's light.
edit on 9-3-2015 by wildespace because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 04:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: wildespace
2) from the Viking orbiter, image taken in 1998. photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...


No, that was the year that image was added to the catalog. The Viking 1 Orbiter entered Mars orbit on 19 June 1976. Operations were terminated on 17 August 1980 after 1485 orbits, so the image was taken three-and-a-half decades ago.

Source



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 04:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Saint Exupery

originally posted by: wildespace
2) from the Viking orbiter, image taken in 1998. photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...


No, that was the year that image was added to the catalog. The Viking 1 Orbiter entered Mars orbit on 19 June 1976. Operations were terminated on 17 August 1980 after 1485 orbits, so the image was taken three-and-a-half decades ago.

Source

Thanks, I've corrected my post.



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 09:09 AM
link   
For a second I thought this could of just been valleys that are actually going down but the view and shadows make it look as though it is rising. But I dont know now, because someone pointed out the shadows beneath the cloud, and that is very telling as to what is going on. Im not saying this is nuclear, and more like a volcano, still amazing pictures



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 09:18 AM
link   
Let's just face it, we'll never know until we physically go there



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 11:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: warthog911
a reply to: Ultralight

Guys i think my reply was misconstrued. When i said that all the pics are from mars, i meant that the current batch of pics that were released last week.
www.dailymail.co.uk... -orbit.html

That blue color in the Valles Marineris is water and next to the erupting volcano, you can see canals or dome cities!


Agreed. And they use a inverse filter so it looks like a bubble of blue when skipper took that filter off, its real water. You can even make out the ripples that naturally flow around logs and rocks in the corrected photos and some of their so called frozen blue chemical soup they pretend the real water is. These are good photos.

The one with the atmosphere, shows a deliberately blotted out black spot. Hmmm...wonder what is being hidden from us. Its so blatant and feeding false information makes me so furious. The IOU's that they owe me and humanity are mounting enormously. Its akin to Isil destroying ancient artifacts. Breathtaking evil.


edit on 9-3-2015 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 11:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Unity_99
The one with the atmosphere, shows a deliberately blotted out black spot. Hmmm...wonder what is being hidden from us. Its so blatant and feeding false information makes me so furious.

A little bit of research helps a lot in preventing getting furious. www.spaceflight101.com...

The black spot is Phobos.

No liquid water has ever been seen on Mars. The bluish colouration is basaltic sands, the "waves" are sand dunes.

The only lies are the ones you (and other conspiracy believers) make up yourself.



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 12:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Unity_99
You can even make out the ripples that naturally flow around logs and rocks in the corrected photos and some of their so called frozen blue chemical soup they pretend the real water is.


No.

You really can't.

Here's the Valles Marineris image superimposed on Google Mars



It is 1750+ km wide.

Here is a line the same length on the Amazon Basin:



Show me water flowing round a rock.
edit on 9-3-2015 by onebigmonkey because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 01:29 PM
link   
I will go to: atmosphere and/or cloud formation.. just guessing



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
Same crater, 3 different probes.



No smoke plume, just differences in camera resolution and lighting.


I chalk it up to a crappy camera made in India. The resolution is horrible compared to the other images, look at that fuzziness.



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 02:27 PM
link   
Nuclear bomb!
I thoght mars was dead?
no volcanic action



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: SgtHamsandwich
a reply to: flammadraco
Does Mars still have active volcanoes? I thought it was a dead planet?


It is possible that there is still a lot of gas trapped under the surface and a tremor might release it. (there could still be tremors due to cooling, as on the moon.)



posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
Same crater, 3 different probes.



No smoke plume, just differences in camera resolution and lighting.


Ahhhh....good deal. Thank you for proving I'm not crazy.




posted on Mar, 9 2015 @ 07:31 PM
link   
I would say they are probably dust storms on mars, mars also does have cloud's but they are far more rare than here on earth due to the rarity of the atmosphere, I also think that these are very intriguing however and deserve more study.

I remember when there was furore with people holding placards accusing NASA or polluting space in the early 90's when Nasa were sending an Isotope powered probe to view mars, it was supposed to take a close view of the face on mars in the cydonia region but like other's it mysteriously stopped communicating (at least to the official control room) as it made it's manoeuvre to slow into the planets orbit, now what would it take to replace a probe's power source with an actual nuclear warhead by making a duplicate that at least provides the expected telemetry to the civilian control room once it is sent on it's merry way substituting it at launch.

The face now appears to be caved in and extremely badly damaged just like a bomb has hit it and then there is the debacle with the possible use of a supposed test probe to the moon to destroy a possible complex there.

If water exists in liquid form on mars it will be deep underground, even if it had an earth like atmosphere it is further out and the water would remain frozen, mars would be a white planet if a precipitation cycle existed due to this but I do remain convinced there are ruin's there and personally believe they where built by ancient Human's not alien's, also I do not believe we have a base there but I would think that Black ops probes and perhaps even mission's may have been sent if the potential rewards were deemed worth the investment by that handful of individual's who free from oversight do what they want with the black budget of the US.

I Believe the destruction was so because of a "If I can't have it or control it no one can" attitude among these same individuals and sadly this proves they have no right to what they seek to control like the biblical story of Solomon and the child with two mother's.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join