It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Mister_Bit
But, as detailed in the OP, studies have shown that porn is more addictive than just about anything else. I think I read a stat that it takes as little as 12 times to be addicted.
I tend to think that porn fulfills, in the most superficial and sad way, a need for human connection. But, ironically and tragically, the unreality of porn actually works to separate a person from authentic human intimacy as the average person doesn't look or act like a porn star and it's that fake porn imagery that is connected to arousal.
Chocolate doesn't do that. Not always even alcohol or drugs.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
Porn is destructive for love relationships as well as for the people who become addicted to it. Because we live in a free society I wouldn't ban it, but if asked my opinion I'd tell people not to go near it. It's unhealthy, IMHO.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Mister_Bit
We are at a philosophical empass so there isn't much use going back and forth.
I will simply end by saying that - IMHO - modern porn hacks the brain and acts to cut off a person from authentic human intimacy and also perpetuates masochistic, sadistic and misogynistic social structures to the benefit of capitalism in it's basest form.
originally posted by: CthulhuMythos
Erectile dysfunction due to watching too much porn is a real phenomenon. The more that is watched, the more hard core it needs to become in order to get turned on. I think that this is being utilised in order to reduce population numbers, and that is one of the reasons that our government is doing very little to address the ease of which it can be watched online. Another reason is that if it also is destroying men's ability to form meaningful long lasting and loving relationships, as they grow up with the images of women looking like prostitutes and acting like prostitutes (and sadly women are complying with this conformity in order to get a dudes attention as they too are being brainwashed via music videos, magazine articles, fashion and movie industry, that this is how you should look and act) it then breaks down the strong unity of the family unit, a strong bond that would make people rise up against tyranny in order to protect that unit.
Everywhere I look, I see porn images. More and more celebrities and famous singers are shooting and distributing porn style pics of themselves. How many web sites just carrying news articles also have semi naked women in ads or other articles down the side of the page? It is desensitising us all, and regular porn watchers even more so. Just have to look at how sex ed is being pushed on younger and younger kids at school, TV programmes called the joy of teenage sex, where they discuss and show images of more extreme sex and fetish sex. It is the same with all the hype and advertising for the film fifty shades of grey ( which was seriously pushed by our very own BBC radio stations for days on end before it's release), a film I see as being designed to normalise fetish, to sew the seed into relationships and individuals who had not thought of fetish before or perhaps thought of it as weird kinky stuff. If this can be normalised and accepted by society in general, then no longer will we need secret private fetish clubs, clubs that our very kinky elite/MPs/judiciary/Lords attend and can be blackmailed because of it. But on this slippery slope, there is another possible reason for over saturation of porn and fetish, and that is to decriminalise and have accepted paedophilia, another thing our kinky elites seem to have a passion for on an industrial scale. A rather scary scenario when you have kids that you are trying desperately to shield and protect.
Now before you brand me as some holier than thou anti sex prude, I am not, I have checked out the fetish scene and been to dungeons, but I do see an agenda at work here, especially as the government could just stipulate that all porn should have an '.xxx' domain where parents could easily filter out that domain and protect their kids, instead of the ridiculous proposal where porn watchers have to go pleading to their ISP to let them watch porn online. Sorry if I got a bit off topic, but I do see it all connected this way in the bigger picture.
originally posted by: subfab
a reply to: kosmicjack
porn is like hitting a tennis ball against the wall. it's fun at first and even a little exciting. but there comes a day when playing alone just doesn't cut it.
my opinion on a side note:
it isn't just men who watch porn. many women and many young kids are watching it. many homes have at least one internet viewing device. does anyone really think kids today want the highest resolution big screen smart phone for homework? kids are driving the modern porn age. we won't know what the result of this easy access to adult content for many years. it's a global social experiment.
It's one thing to add spice with experimenting; it's another when the only way to get off is because you have to experiment with a three way with a farm animal or other so-called transgressive acts in order to feel titillated and sexually aroused.
This entire argument is predicated on a slippery slope fallacy......
originally posted by: FlyersFan
Porn is destructive for love relationships as well as for the people who become addicted to it. Because we live in a free society I wouldn't ban it, but if asked my opinion I'd tell people not to go near it. It's unhealthy, IMHO.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: Realtruth
What about the happy healthy couples that enjoy watching porn together? Is it still all narcissistic me me me?
Or do you/all think that doesn't even exist?