It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NLBS #40: President Obama Can't Say "Radical Islam", so We Offer "Weaponized Islam"

page: 5
55
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 10 2015 @ 08:35 PM
link   
a reply to: theNLBS

Its still the same thing....Just like Obama said, "its just like trying to put makeup on a pig".




posted on Nov, 21 2015 @ 05:22 PM
link   
I laughed way too hard.



posted on Jan, 30 2016 @ 09:01 PM
link   
Radical Islam is a result of generational Western racial terrorism i.e. people trying to defend themselves against the morally reprobate & racially psychotic white world.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Seems like an appropriate time to bump this thread, given some of the rhetoric of the day.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 09:28 PM
link   
weaponized islam implies radical islam. he could have called it dangerous islam or mean islam and he would be correct too.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 09:32 PM
link   
a reply to: vjr1113

If you watch the video, we lay out the rationale that the United States created "weaponized islam" forty years ago.



posted on Mar, 22 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
watched it

i dont relly care why someone decides to use a term a certain way. weaponized defines something as violent when radical defines it as extreme. radical muslims doesn't mean they're violent they same way radical christians aren't violent.

looks like he just wanted to describe exactly what kind of muslims he was talking about. i wouldn't assume he was doing it to be PC and not because he was being descriptive.

its makes no sense to call something radical really because it doesn't address a level of threat. like radical flat earther or radical butterfly catcher. but you say weaponized x group and we have a better understanding of what you're talking about.
edit on 22-3-2016 by vjr1113 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 08:12 AM
link   
How about get rid of both terms, both are just jargon and not really saying anything. Political jargon gives me a headache.



posted on May, 3 2017 @ 03:49 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 3 2017 @ 03:49 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 3 2017 @ 03:49 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 4 2017 @ 01:56 AM
link   
Barry doesn't say Isis because he won't invoke & associate the name with the group.



new topics

top topics



 
55
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join