It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tastyrawmeat
Hello. It seems so open to interpretation, but it would be interesting if those of you that have perhaps studied this in more depth could give me a few pointers on the general idea, maybe some of the opposing viewpoints and your personal opinions.
Thanks
This book brings hope to our lost world. Too many people have been taught that the world is ending today- which takes away hope. Jonathan uses the bible to teach us that the world is not ending today. These teachings were meant for the end of Jeruselum in 70 A.D. The earth isn't going to be burnt up in a fiery ball. God destroyed Jeruselum and set His ministry free to all the world. This is the most encouraging book I have ever read except for the Holy Bible!
originally posted by: tastyrawmeat
a reply to: ketsuko
I just need some pointers on where to begin.
The first question that must be answered for any work of art is the question of when it was written. This is an especially important question for the Book of Revelation because the when determines whether or not to applies to the AD 70 destruction of Jerusalem. As you may guess, I have come to believe the majority of the Book of Revelation was written regarding events that took place at the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. In order to believe that, we must first address the date of authorship. If the book was written in AD 96, as many modern teachers claim, then my point of view cannot be valid. Yet, I believe the overwhelming body of evidence proves beyond reasonable doubt that Revelation was more likely written before AD 68. Let’s look at the proofs to establish the date of writing
disruptingculture.com...
originally posted by: BlueMule
a reply to: tastyrawmeat
I think most Christians will tell you that it describes global events that either happened already, or will happen, or are in the slow process of happening.
But I think it is a very cryptic way of describing the psychological process that an individual goes through when becoming a mystic just like Jesus was.
In a nutshell.
👣
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: BlueMule
a reply to: tastyrawmeat
I think most Christians will tell you that it describes global events that either happened already, or will happen, or are in the slow process of happening.
But I think it is a very cryptic way of describing the psychological process that an individual goes through when becoming a mystic just like Jesus was.
In a nutshell.
👣
Its really not that cryptic or mystic.
originally posted by: tastyrawmeat
Hello. It seems so open to interpretation, but it would be interesting if those of you that have perhaps studied this in more depth could give me a few pointers on the general idea, maybe some of the opposing viewpoints and your personal opinions.
Thanks