It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Vaccinated Farmed Fish Have Side Effects
by Catherine J. Frompovich
Be forewarned, please, that this will not be very pleasant reading, especially if readers eat farm-raised fish and, in particular, salmon, a highly-farm-raised fish. “Wild-caught” need not apply. During my years of research, I’ve come across all sorts of information, studies, and papers relating to animal vaccines, but this one sort of “takes the cake,” in my opinion. Farmed fish are vaccinated because, according to the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science (NSVS)
--snip
Now, we get down to what, for me, was the “nitty-gritty” of the fish’s health issues:
1. They were concerned about animal welfare and the “quality of life” for the fish prior to slaughter.
2. That the side-effects from vaccines in fish were still occurring after 12 years of extensive use of vaccines, and people were eating vaccinated fish!
3. They want to find ways to refine present testing to reduce side-effects! So, they realize that side effects still go on after 12 years, and continue to use vaccines. Duh!
- See more at: www.naturalblaze.com...
originally posted by: MojaveBurning
a reply to: wasaka
your title was in 'text-ese'
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
originally posted by: nullafides
bastardized english language like "R U" and "B ware"
I fixed it.
originally posted by: nullafides
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
originally posted by: nullafides
bastardized english language like "R U" and "B ware"
I fixed it.
Star and Flag for you Sir!
originally posted by: korkythecat
originally posted by: nullafides
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
originally posted by: nullafides
bastardized english language like "R U" and "B ware"
I fixed it.
Star and Flag for you Sir!
and another - not that I would ever suck up to a higher power....
Over the years fish farmers in Norway (and strangly [sic] enough to a very limited extent in other countries) have experienced severe and unacceptable side-effects in vaccinated fish.
[Hmmm! I could have told them to expect that; it’s a no brainer!] [CJF emphasis added]
Something I find rather interesting, and bordering on empathetic, is the remark on slide 15 that vaccines save fish lives [sounds familiar] from acute death from bacterial infections, but some fish are sentenced to “life-long suffering due to severe pathological lesions in internal organs.” If that happens to fish from vaccines, what, if anything, happens to human vaccinees’ organs?
Interestingly, though, there is a caveat that’s added, “…but anorexia and retarded growth are good indicators.” Anorexia in fish! Retarded growth too! Hmmm. Can autism occur in fish?
Candidly, the PP presentation reports that the magnitude and significance of fish disease cases are unknown and “certainly underreported” [probably just like human vaccine damage]
Is this an example of testing where results obtained in experiments are far from what happens in real life? [Again, human vaccine tests are fudged; we know that from some whistleblowers [6] and a federal court case [5].]
It would seem that the NSVS scientists have more concern about fish than the U.S. FDA has about vaccines harming children. With all the complaints about the HPV vaccines causing harms, even deaths, to teenage girls, the FDA apparently is not asking any questions!
Vaccines are BIG business for both humans and animals, too. Here are just a few animal vaccination schedules: