It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Shadow Herder
Yea.. The K-T Barrier separates the Cretaceous and Paleogene eras in Earth's history. It is a distinct line in the geologic record that marks the extinction of the dinosaurs.
You should then study the geological record.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Shadow Herder
And YOU are talking about a global event that would cover the entire planet in water, killing all land species and much of the water life due to increasing water pressure, depth, and lack of sunlight to the bottom. Such an event would be DAMN visible in the geologic record.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Shadow Herder
And YOU are talking about a global event that would cover the entire planet in water, killing all land species and much of the water life due to increasing water pressure, depth, and lack of sunlight to the bottom. Such an event would be DAMN visible in the geologic record.
It is, look at google earth, everything in light blue was submerged within the last 10000 years. Pretty global.
If you are afraid that the flood is real means the bible is true than you are blinding yourself. Forget the bible and read mankinds verbal and written accounts of the past.
Yeah again, that means that WE ARE LIVING IN THE "GLOBAL FLOOD". No Ark necessary, just run for higher ground.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
You should then study the geological record.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Shadow Herder
And YOU are talking about a global event that would cover the entire planet in water, killing all land species and much of the water life due to increasing water pressure, depth, and lack of sunlight to the bottom. Such an event would be DAMN visible in the geologic record.
It is, look at google earth, everything in light blue was submerged within the last 10000 years and before that during the period you mentioned most lands in the world was underwater. Pretty global.
If you are afraid that the if the flood is real then that would mean the bible is true than you are blinding yourself. Forget the bible and read mankinds verbal and written accounts of the past.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Shadow Herder
Parts of land having been submerged in the past doesn't mean that a global flood has occurred.
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
Yeah again, that means that WE ARE LIVING IN THE "GLOBAL FLOOD". No Ark necessary, just run for higher ground.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
You should then study the geological record.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Shadow Herder
And YOU are talking about a global event that would cover the entire planet in water, killing all land species and much of the water life due to increasing water pressure, depth, and lack of sunlight to the bottom. Such an event would be DAMN visible in the geologic record.
It is, look at google earth, everything in light blue was submerged within the last 10000 years and before that during the period you mentioned most lands in the world was underwater. Pretty global.
If you are afraid that the if the flood is real then that would mean the bible is true than you are blinding yourself. Forget the bible and read mankinds verbal and written accounts of the past.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Shadow Herder
The earth has never flooded completely. Yes, when the last Ice Age ended, the ice caps melted and rose the sea levels causing the shorelines to recede. However, water never fully covered the planet. Local floods have also occurred throughout time with enough of them building up to the point that possibly all the land on earth has been covered by a flood at some point. But you cannot make the jump that they were all the same flood.
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
Wait wait wait, hang on. I think we're actually arguing the same point here. He's not saying there was a Noah flood, he's saying that the Ice Age may have originated flood myths. Sure.
This is basically what we've been saying too, although there's no need to impose a worldwide, short-term catastrophe onto it. I think the Noah myth and other flood myths probably ARE based in fact, but that the facts are nowhere near as grandiose and Earth-spanning as bible literalists would like to believe.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
Wait wait wait, hang on. I think we're actually arguing the same point here. He's not saying there was a Noah flood, he's saying that the Ice Age may have originated flood myths. Sure.
more or less. There could of been one single event during the ice age melt that caused a major tsunami and as we all know it doesnt take long for a tsunami to come and go. A few weeks is a barely blip on the historic radar.