It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Psynic
Nobody's going off half cocked here. The media is milking this for all it's worth.
Wait for some facts, wait for some evidence, speculating on ATS just embarrasses us all.
originally posted by: AccessDenied
If I let my brain go alarmist mode and think terrorist every time a story like this came around....they win.
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
Actually it's in Dartmouth. Across the bridges from Halifax. My hometown. Don't be calling "terrorism" yet. Dartmouth is a nasty town.
It was big news last week when it was reported ISIS was targeting the West Edmonton Mall in Alberta,
This news item is being played off the outstanding situation here.
TERRORISM is definitely being implied.
I have friends in Dartmouth.
originally posted by: AccessDenied
a reply to: Psynic
I LIVE in Halifax,thanks. Very aware of threats made,and bills trying to be past. Fact is, in this country more likely to be killed by a moose or a cop. Not going to scare me with claims of terrorism .
originally posted by: AccessDenied
a reply to: Psynic
I LIVE in Halifax,thanks. Very aware of threats made,and bills trying to be passed. Fact is, in this country more likely to be killed by a moose or a cop. Not going to scare me with claims of terrorism .
originally posted by: AccessDenied
Fact is, in this country more likely to be killed by a moose or a cop. Not going to scare me with claims of terrorism .
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
The reason is to take away your rights to freedom of speech.
There is no free speech in Canada. No 1st Amendment. Ask anyone that's dealt with a Human Rights Tribunal.
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
The reason is to take away your rights to freedom of speech.
There is no free speech in Canada. No 1st Amendment. Ask anyone that's dealt with a Human Rights Tribunal.
There is no Bill-51 either.
But there will be soon.
And then the government will be able to decide what's allowed to be posted on-line.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
The reason is to take away your rights to freedom of speech.
There is no free speech in Canada. No 1st Amendment. Ask anyone that's dealt with a Human Rights Tribunal.
There is no Bill-51 either.
But there will be soon.
And then the government will be able to decide what's allowed to be posted on-line.
When's the last time you saw a Conservative attack ad? They figured out Canadians don't fall for that crap.
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
The reason is to take away your rights to freedom of speech.
There is no free speech in Canada. No 1st Amendment. Ask anyone that's dealt with a Human Rights Tribunal.
There is no Bill-51 either.
But there will be soon.
And then the government will be able to decide what's allowed to be posted on-line.
When's the last time you saw a Conservative attack ad? They figured out Canadians don't fall for that crap.
The only ads I've seen from the PCs ARE attack ads.
Stuff about Trudeau not being qualified to run a government.
They've got a whole series of them.
How could you NOT know that???
Is reductio ad absurdum a style of yours?
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
The reason is to take away your rights to freedom of speech.
There is no free speech in Canada. No 1st Amendment. Ask anyone that's dealt with a Human Rights Tribunal.
There is no Bill-51 either.
But there will be soon.
And then the government will be able to decide what's allowed to be posted on-line.
When's the last time you saw a Conservative attack ad? They figured out Canadians don't fall for that crap.
The only ads I've seen from the PCs ARE attack ads.
Stuff about Trudeau not being qualified to run a government.
They've got a whole series of them.
How could you NOT know that???
But not for a LONG time. They backfired.
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
The reason is to take away your rights to freedom of speech.
There is no free speech in Canada. No 1st Amendment. Ask anyone that's dealt with a Human Rights Tribunal.
There is no Bill-51 either.
But there will be soon.
And then the government will be able to decide what's allowed to be posted on-line.
When's the last time you saw a Conservative attack ad? They figured out Canadians don't fall for that crap.
The only ads I've seen from the PCs ARE attack ads.
Stuff about Trudeau not being qualified to run a government.
They've got a whole series of them.
How could you NOT know that???
Is reductio ad absurdum a style of yours?
Is attacking a person with a differing opinion one of yours?
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
originally posted by: intrepid
originally posted by: Psynic
The reason is to take away your rights to freedom of speech.
There is no free speech in Canada. No 1st Amendment. Ask anyone that's dealt with a Human Rights Tribunal.
There is no Bill-51 either.
But there will be soon.
And then the government will be able to decide what's allowed to be posted on-line.
When's the last time you saw a Conservative attack ad? They figured out Canadians don't fall for that crap.
The only ads I've seen from the PCs ARE attack ads.
Stuff about Trudeau not being qualified to run a government.
They've got a whole series of them.
How could you NOT know that???
Is reductio ad absurdum a style of yours?
Is attacking a person with a differing opinion one of yours?
I did not "attack" you and that you, as a moderator, should accuse me of such is reprehensible.
I merely asked if the falseness of your statements was a tactic.