It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judgment Day - March 25, 2016 A.D.

page: 7
9
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Edward Palamar

I read your posts. There's a function that allows me to do that.




posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:29 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

the only true brotherhood is ones peers...



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
My degree is in Social Work and clinical counseling - with a specialty in Children and Families.

I'll pray for them.


originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Keep that in mind. I'm around.

Oh, big tough guy.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:32 PM
link   
there is nothing at all wrong with individualism

imeo....



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Edward Palamar

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
My degree is in Social Work and clinical counseling - with a specialty in Children and Families.

I'll pray for them.


originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
Keep that in mind. I'm around.

Oh, big tough guy.


What is the reason for your hostility please?

Even when members offer to talk and discuss you insult them with short attacks, it does not seem fluid with your other posts?



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:34 PM
link   
a reply to: nonspecific

Yeah I don't think john the baptist would behave like this...



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:34 PM
link   
a reply to: AinElohim

Indeed. What I'm wondering about is the timeline -

But while in term for this third time, September 25, 1955 A.D. to June 25, 1956 A.D., a crime was committed by the first king of Persia (Daniel 11:2, the same as Daniel 11:20) against me,


And, now (it appears) he is 58, which adds up. (I'm 56 and was born in 1958) So - immediately reborn?
I don't understand.

I do believe in reincarnation, but this is just very strange. Interesting. And strange.

I wonder how vivid his memories, and for how long he has known this history of his.
I wish I remembered my last incarnation, but I don't.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: nonspecific

Yeah I don't think john the baptist would behave like this...


He's not John the baptist, he's a very naughty boy.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Edward Palamar


Oh, big tough guy.


No - small, aging woman.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:37 PM
link   
sure he would have

JTB was an eccentric and wise to the core....



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:41 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: boymonkey74
Ring these numbers please and just talk.

And I suppose you're going to pay for my minutes, too, meine kleine filthy, thief.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: AinElohim

Thought i knew you...
edit on 8-3-2015 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Edward Palamar

No because I'm in the UK...
I'm sure you can afford a phone call.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: AinElohim

Thought i knew you...


ahem... you got the wrong guy

me = cosmic.artifact the man who killed your buddy Darwin.

yes... notice my dots?


edit on 8-3-2015 by AinElohim because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: nonspecific
You have to admit your posts are a little bizzare,

No, I don't have to admit that.


originally posted by: nonspecific
it's only natural that people would be concerned for you.

Even assuming your previous premise, it would only be a possibility.

The count is accurate and is non-assumptive, neither is it offensive nor implicative of a mental and/or social disorder. It is neither rash, nor rude.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: nonspecific
Well that seems a little harsh?

Seeming harsh and actually being harsh are two different things.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Edward Palamar

originally posted by: nonspecific
You have to admit your posts are a little bizzare,

No, I don't have to admit that.


originally posted by: nonspecific
it's only natural that people would be concerned for you.

Even assuming your previous premise, it would only be a possibility.

The count is accurate and is non-assumptive, neither is it offensive nor implicative of a mental and/or social disorder. It is neither rash, nor rude.


I simply must disagree, even on a site such as this your posts would be considered bizzare, the fact that you choose to belive otherwise does not change the fact.

Yes it is a possibility but the most likely one given the evidence at hand.

As to the last part of your post I must ask you to explain as I do not understand what it means.



posted on Mar, 8 2015 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Edward Palamar

originally posted by: nonspecific
Well that seems a little harsh?

Seeming harsh and actually being harsh are two different things.


Ok I will rephrase my statement.

that was a harsh and uncalled for statement.







 
9
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join