It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

An Israeli Insult

page: 15
74
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: flyandi

A country having nuclear energy is acceptable if they want it, they are going thru the proper channels to do it.

There is nothing political correct here, facts are not PC.

How is the Iran gov a rouge gov anymore then the one that is trying to undermine peace talks?




posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle




Personally, I think NuttinYahoo needs to be bitch slapped into next year by congress/US government.


Our Congress gave him a standing ovation :-(

Naturally he did bring up the holocaust again...no surprise there.



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:19 PM
link   
a reply to: nwtrucker

OMG. You literally didn't say anything. hahahaha

All mine were facts. You stated none. FACT. Halliburton gave them secrets. You say it's not because they weren't punished? Well AIG wasn't punished for collapsing the housing market. The big guys are all on the same team. And you are their lackey. Congrats. You should be proud that you're part of their herd.

AAC



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: flyandi

And what about israel stockipe of WMDs and its refusal to not let inspectors in and and sign onto the same wmd treatys every other nuclear power is part of?

Do they get a free pass?



No, they don't - and I specifically didn't address Israel since my stance is that Israel is doing enough crap on their own.
However this whole thing has less to do with Israel and more with the safety of the planet or at least the safety of that region which seems to influence our regions on a daily basis.





Is



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:32 PM
link   
This is the 21st century, and this generation does not bend over when the Jews scream "but the Holocaust!" oh boohoo. The general public is also growing increasingly Godless, meaning they sure dont care for anything Christian or Jew, or the 20th century propaganda stunt that the Christian people should be the lapdogs of the Jews as God's chosen people. In fact, this stunt will only further strengthen the power of the Democratic party as the new generation feels increasingly alienated by the Republicans, and will see this for the petty war baiting that it is.

The internet has helped to numb the signal which can alter your way of thinking since it is taking peoples exposure away from the primary source of that signal, establishment media. This is why the general public is increasingly critical of Israeli war crimes, crimes against humanity, bribing public officials to influence policy in America and Europe, and their call for the good little Christians of the West to step up and die for their Jewish masters like the good little pit bulls we are.

IM MAD AS HELL, AND IM NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:32 PM
link   
a reply to: AnAbsoluteCreation

As usual NO FACTS. If they were 'facts' then all you do is prove the left doesn't have a moral leg to stand on as they have done nothing.

If it WAS a 'fact" you have more right supporters backing you than left. Deal with it...



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: flyandi

A country having nuclear energy is acceptable if they want it, they are going thru the proper channels to do it.

There is nothing political correct here, facts are not PC.

How is the Iran gov a rouge gov anymore then the one that is trying to undermine peace talks?


Please don't be naive. There is no global right to nuclear energy even you might have the capabilities. Nuclear energy brings a lot of responsibility with it which includes that you can provide a safe environment. Iran's own government goal is to create a new World Order by changing the balance of power - that's their official goal - so how do you change the balance of power ? Definitely not through nuclear energy. Their whole government charter needs to change in order to come remotely close to providing a safe environment - something that is highly unlikely.

And there are no peace talks here, there are talks to defuse a situation because Iran threatened to go to war if sanctions are not lowered and our president is stupid enough to go after this. Get the facts right!

We gotta stop living in a dream world where everyone is happy and friends with each other. Iran is a silent threat to the world .. and if I am wrong - awesome - but if I am right .. well ..



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Well if Obama did not threaten to shoot down any Israeli plane headed for Iran then he would not have to come here and tell Congress what a Lying, corrupt dirt bag Obama is. He is a Muslim Brotherhood leader, Obama wants his peace deal so he can have something that makes his Noble Prize seem worth more than the paper it is written on, even if its a crime to everyone in the world.


So what he should let them bomb away? How about the rights of the Iranian people to have power and not be bombed? I figure when Israel makes their bomb runs the US pays for the weapon anyway so we should probably decide.

Nothing new I guess



Operation Orchard[2][3] (Hebrew: מבצע בוסתן‎, Mivtza bustan) was an Israeli airstrike on a suspected nuclear reactor[4] in the Deir ez-Zor region[5] of Syria, which occurred just after midnight (local time) on September 6, 2007.




On June 7, 1981, eight Israeli F-16 fighter jets, protected by six F-15 escorts, dropped 16 2,000-pound bombs on the nearly completed Osirak nuclear reactor at the Tuwaitha complex in Iraq.





When grant, loans, interest and tax deductions are added together for the fiscal year ending in September 30, 1997, our special relationship with Israel cost U.S. taxpayers over $10 billion.

Since 1949 the U.S. has given Israel a total of $83.205 billion. The interest costs borne by U.S. tax payers on behalf of Israel are $49.937 billion, thus making the total amount of aid given to Israel since 1949 $133.132 billion. This may mean that U.S. government has given more federal aid to the average Israeli citizen in a given year than it has given to the average American citizen.

www.wrmea.org...



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80




I'll say I 100% disagree with shooting the planes down but I also 100% agree with stopping an an unsanctioned attack on a country that could very well spark an all out war on that region.


A war that the US would pay for and be obligated to join once started. This is our future they are playing with.



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:48 PM
link   
[QUOTE]

So what he should let them bomb away? How about the rights of the Iranian people to have power and not be bombed? I figure when Israel makes their bomb runs the US pays for the weapon anyway so we should probably decide.
[/QUOTE]

There is already the issue #1 - this is not the decision of the citizens - this is the decision of their Government. There are no "free" elections in Iran.. so the whole argument "Power to the People" is not flying here at all. I doubt that even most of the citizen even have a clue what's really going on.



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:51 PM
link   
like seriously people, there is not one nation on Earth more responsible for the suffering of the human race and the collapse of nations over the last 68 years than the USA. but

Iran is a silent threat to the world ..

is somehow more dangerous?? American Intelligence confirmed no work towards a bomb, Israeli intelligence even stated the same.

I suppose Netanyahu knows more than the intelligence apparatus that has assets buried deep within foreign governments both enemy and friendly though right? You know, because "oh but the holocaust!" , and Christians need to support israel and all that garbage right?

The Globalists have only a single, and one single reason why they want Iran attacked. Because the Persians have the audacity to not bend over and sign their central banking and the nations wealth over The House of the Red Shield .

IF Iran ever got a nuclear bomb, it would more than likely in fact bring peace to the Middle East. No nuclear power has ever attacked another directly right?? Pakistan has crazier people in charge of their nukes, and their intelligence apparatus gave sanctuary to Osama Bin laden (allegedly) even they did not fire a shot at India, or Israel for that matter.

So just explain to me why anyone in the world, any human citizen of the world, should believe claims that Iran is a silent threat ready to destroy the world and burn Israel down in a nuclear fire?



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: DYepes
like seriously people, there is not one nation on Earth more responsible for the suffering of the human race and the collapse of nations over the last 68 years than the USA.


If the arguments vanish, than there is always the good old "USA is the evil of the world" argument. Terrorist use the same to justify their actions...

Still, you enjoy every day the benefits of the (sometimes doubtful) decision we made in the past decades including typing the stuff here and not being thrown into prison for 10 years.



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 02:11 PM
link   
the argument is not over, it was a counter argument. But I suppose facts that you dont agree with suddenly arent facts anymore? I love my country and everything it has to offer (save for killer cops and a declining standard of decency), but the policy decisions of Israeli paid representatives.

So go ahead flyandi, take the challenge. Find another country on Earth in the last 68 years responsible for more bloodshed and destruction of nations than the one I reside in, and likely yourself. It should be easy right, since the argument has allegedly "vanished" as you say.

Certainly dont try and say Iran, that would just be a silly claim to make. Not, even, RUSSIA, or CHINA can come close based on documented history. So if not those two, the who?? Prove me wrong.

and just for #s and giggles let us look at the past twenty years of claims by this jackass that iran is mere years away from making a bomb



It is worth remembering, however, that Netanyahu has said much of this before. Almost two decades ago, in 1996, Netanyahu addressed a joint session of Congress where he darkly warned, “If Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons, this could presage catastrophic consequences, not only for my country, and not only for the Middle East, but for all mankind,” adding that, “the deadline for attaining this goal is getting extremely close.”

Almost 20 years later that deadline has apparently still not passed, but Netanyahu is still making dire predictions about an imminent Iranian nuclear weapon. Four years before that Congressional speech, in 1992, then-parliamentarian Netanyahu advised the Israeli Knesset that Iran was “three to five years” away from reaching nuclear weapons capability, and that this threat had to be “uprooted by an international front headed by the U.S.”

In his 1995 book, “Fighting Terrorism,” Netanyahu once again asserted that Iran would have a nuclear weapon in “three to five years,” apparently forgetting about the expiration of his old deadline.

For a considerable time thereafter, Netanyahu switched his focus to hyping the purported nuclear threat posed by another country, Iraq, about which he claimed there was “no question” that it was “advancing towards to the development of nuclear weapons.” Testifying again in front of Congress again in 2002, Netanyahu claimed that Iraq’s nonexistent nuclear program was in fact so advanced that the country was now operating “centrifuges the size of washing machines.”

Needless to say, these claims turned out to be disastrously false. Despite this, Netanyahu, apparently unchastened by the havoc his previous false charges helped create, immediately went back to ringing the alarm bells about Iran.

edit on 3/3/2015 by DYepes because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: AnAbsoluteCreation Mark Twain said "Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig." You are staunch in your words, but lacking in your facts and those who are like that rarely know the truth nor want to learn it. I won't argue with you. You choose to not listen to any thoughts but your own, so I'd be wasting my time if I tried...and I certainly don't want to annoy the pig.
You think you're educated. You aren't. You've chosen selective reasoning. Most liberals do that. I choose to not try to compete with that. It's not worth it.



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Char-Lee You need to get out of the mainstream media. This was set up months ago... Barry knew it. Everyone knew it. Barry didn't start complaining until he started getting heat about other things and then he did what he always does, create (or try to create) a distraction. It didn't work for most people. But for those like you, you bought right into his 'this is so unfair' stuff. There was nothing wrong with him coming to give a speech. He's done it before. He broke no protocol, only Barry's feelings. He didn't have the center stage for a moment and just couldn't stand it.



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: pikestaff
My, how is so much hate generated against a man doing his job? reminds me of Churchill and 1939, but Netanyahu wont be able to say "told you so" when Israel is a field of green glass.
As an aside, Jews have allways lived in that area, ever since king Solomon, long before 'Arabs' were invented, Israel had Egyptians to the south, and Hittites to the north, Hittites morphed into Turks, but Egyptians staid that, Egyptians.





The Law of Return, the Israeli law that established the right of Jews around the world to settle in Israel and which remains in force today, was a central tenet of Zionism. It is invoked by some religious Jews to support territorial claims (even though, based on this research, many Arabs, including Palestinians, where therefore also have a genetic ‘right of return’).


Yes they have been there in the form of those they now want annihilated.




he Jewish community of Persia, modern-day Iran, is one of the oldest in the Diaspora, and its historical roots reach back to the 6th century B.C.E

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...




The new research underscores an emerging consensus that wandering Jewish men, from the Near East, established a mosaic of small Jewish communities—first in Italy and then scattered throughout Europe, often taking on local gentile wives and raising their children as Jews.

geneticliteracyproject.org...



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jobeycool
When Iran gets nukes in the future and the nucelar arms race breaks out in the middle east,we are done for as a world with these loons with nukes.


Most of the worlds "loons" already have nukes!



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: peskyhumans
I have to agree with everything Netanyahu is saying. Iran does sponsor terrorism and if they get nukes it will only guarantee nuclear war. You have to be a special kind of stupid if you don't see that.


And the US and other countries has not?


You have to be a special kind of stupid if you don't see that.



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 03:17 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 3 2015 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: flyandi

So we get to condemn the country that really hasn't done that much to anyone all while supporting the one that attacks people constantly?
All we hear is Iran is going to do this, Iran is going to do that. They want to kill anyone and every one, but yet, they haven't done much of anything...
If they were so hell bent on attacking everyone, why haven't they?
This question never gets answered, well it does, but with "well I don't want to test it".
Sorry, but we don't get to just assume the worst when they have not shown the pattern.

I am not saying there is a right to the power, but if a country wants it, and it is taking the proper channels to get it, who is to say they can not have it?

The guy that has been saying they are going to get the bomb for 20 years and has been wrong every time?
The guy that DOES attack other countries and does so in the name of religion and religious land?


edit on rdTue, 03 Mar 2015 15:24:14 -0600America/Chicago320151480 by Sremmos80 because: I mean it was good stuff but no need to bold it all




new topics

top topics



 
74
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join