The Manchild is a Son of Jesus
(or some farther descendant)
I will not start a new thread but will use this one.
There are many reasons why the Manchild in Revelation 12 cannot be Jesus. First, Jesus wasn't raptured as a baby! Then, Mary his mother didn't flee in
the desert Alone, but together with Jesus and Joseph. Then, the Apocalypse is written some 100years later and is a vision not of the past but a
prophecy of the future. Another thing, the birth happens in space, near earth indeed but in space not on the surface of planet earth. Perhaps in a
spaceship. Both the dragon and the Woman stand in space. Symbolic yes, but also showing location. Because John could see them on earth as he saw them
later on earth, but he saw them in space at the time of the birth of manchild and his rapture.
Only a Son of Jesus could fulfil that role, because Jesus himself has different much bigger things to do. When I say "son" it could mean great great
great grand son.
For 1980+ years after the Ascension Jesus could have as many descendants as he wanted, on any planet He wanted, or in the highest heaven wherever it
is. This is a logical conclusion.
What we have as written text are a dozen or so gospels, both newly discovered manuscripts and well known gnostic ones, both old enough and authentic
books that were persecuted at their time. They were not changed by Constantine and therefore are much more likely to be authentic. They all speak of
the woman Mary Magdalene being the wife of Jesus on Earth.
The story of Mary Magdalene's earthy life goes to France. I do not buy into the theory the French kings are descendants of Jesus. They were too bad to
be! I'd rather assume, that following the example of Jesus, and Mother Mary, Mary Magdalene was raptured and ascended to heaven or another planet at
the end of her earthly life. So might be her son(s) and daughter(s) as many as she had.
It is a pity the church blindly denies those manuscripts and stamps "forgery" on every text that speaks differently than the real historic forgery -
Constantine-approved canonical gospels. Not that they are untrue. They are too narrow and omit major events from the life of Jesus. Such as contacts
with the angels ET. Such as His own wife and children. Such as his first 30 years life on earth. Too many facts are cut off, facts that must be
present. Why "must"?
Because frankly Mother Mary wouldn't retell to Luke word by word the "Magnificat" that magnifies herself, if She didn't tell him beforehand many more
details of the life of her beloved Son in the so called secret years. How is it we have several songs, of Mary, of Elizabeth, of Zachariah, of Simon
in the temple, written word by word and REPEATED everyday during the centuries monastic life, but we don't have the rest of the story? It cannot be
forgotten, missing, or not told by Mary to Luke, and to the other apostles, if those songs are repeated so meticulously. Why is it missing then?
The only logical answer is it was cut off intentionally by someone. Only the Roman emperors who established the Christianity from persecuted to state
religion could have done that, thru the hands of their subject bishops and church fathers. The rest who didn't obey, were called heretics banned, and
some burned even at that early time.
To go back to the Son of Jesus. There are sons of Jesus (and daughters naturally). The question is not IF but WHERE are they. I suggest they are up in
the space. The Revelation 12 birth is a cosmic event.
Jesus is not permitted to come NOW because of his own wordings: "For I tell you, you will not see me again, until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes
in the name of the Lord.’...Wordings said to the Jews and to us as well. Because on every mass we say and sing those same words" blessed is he who
comes int he name of the lord". Why don't we say, why didn't Jesus say "until you say blessed is the Lord?" BECAUSE HE IS A DIFFERENT PERSON! The
Lord's messenger, personal representative,o will be sent forward, may be as John the Baptist in the First Coming. What better option than the Lord's
own son? I admit it is not the only possibility though (many will say, Elijah).
I don't imagine a better case for the extraterrestrial angels than to come leaded by the son of Jesus. If not, they may say they come in the name of
Jesus and that will be enough. Or leaded by Elijah. But Elijah doesn't fit into the image of the manchild. May be all, Elijah, Enoch, and the Son of
Jesus will come, one after another or altogether?
But if some others ET say Jesus is non existent personage of history, as the Andromedans do, then be sure they are not the good ones. I am afraid they
will come soon after the good ones come and go, together with those who are saved.
Then all those people left behind, may be religious devote people, who showed no trust and did not want to read the full truth of Jesus, will brace
the really bad ones who do not come anymore in the name of the Lord.
I don't know the time period between the two groups. Perhaps it is beyond our human lives, if cataclysmic event stands between. In other words the End
times may come after the chastisement and the era of peace. The evil aliens may come just then, not before.
But in era of peace will enter only those who accept the truth of Jesus and his kingdom as children. I don't see much of his kingdom in the 2000 years
Christianity and political Christendom.
May be we are not worthy to receive the Son of Jesus at all. May be we go directly to the Chastisement with brief rapture of all God-loving people in
minutes. I don't know. I list options, not definite scenarios, and never set dates.
If tomorrow the EM weapons stop communication, internet, cell phones, please don't say you weren't warned. Here it is told more than one option, some
of them contradict each other so you can choose or think of something else better than me. Everyone of you have reason to decide for himself.
edit on 26-3-2015 by 2012newstart because: (no reason given)