Merck Acknowledged FDA Approved Vaccines Originating From Aborted Human Fetuses

Dr. Paul Offit, the director of the vaccine education center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia said "There are perhaps nanograms of DNA fragments still found in the vaccine, perhaps billionths of a gram"

Merck, the vaccine's manufacturer, acknowledged that those cells were originally obtained from an electively aborted fetus. They were used to start a cell line, which is a cell multiplied over and over again to produce cells that are of a consistent genetic makeup. The WI-38 cell line is used as a culture to grow live viruses that are used in vaccines.

Vaccines Developed Using Human Cell Strains

"Merck, as well as other vaccine manufacturers, uses two well-established human cell lines to grow the virus for selected vaccines," Merck said in a statement to ABC News. "The FDA has approved the use of these cell lines for the production of these Merck vaccines." Some childhood vaccines, including the one against rubella -- which is part of the MMR vaccine given to millions of children worldwide for measles, mumps and rubella -- is cultured in "WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts," according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's fact sheet on the vaccine's ingredients.

abcnews.go.com...


Dr. Theresa Deisher is a world renowned scientist in the field of adult stem cell therapies and regenerative medicine

Other common vaccines, including those for chicken pox, hepatitis and rabies, are also propagated in cells originating from legally aborted human fetuses, according to the FDA. Quoting Dr. Theresa Deisher on this subject:

"Vaccines with fetal cells, such as measles-mumps-rubella, chickenpox and hepatitis A are not only morally problematic"

birthofanewearth.blogspot.com...

Relevant ATS Thread
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Everyone that's ever been vaccinated is going to want to start knowing exactly what they had injected. We should have been certain before we needed a band aid.

a reply to: gmoneystunt

or you could just drink Pepsi

a reply to: wasaka

I know Pepsi had done research with it but I'm not sure its in the product actually contains it in grocery stores.
Its still creepy

a reply to: Iamthatbish
I agree, I was checking to see if its listed somehow under the ingredients in the vaccines. I see things such as MRC-5 cells and human-diploid fibroblast cell cultures
vaccines.procon.org...

The cell lines WI-38 and MRC-5 are derived from tissue from aborted fetuses.
www.ncbcenter.org...

a reply to: gmoneystunt

I'll let you in on a little secret, they've been doing this since the 1960's and it is not a secret.

Your Dr. is Pro-life and that is her main problem. She claims the DNA mixes with your DNA and causes every disease under the Sun. Her research has been called "Beyond Stupid" by some that has reviewed it.

Don't worry though. She is working developing Vaccines that don't have DNA in them and supposedly won't cause Autism.

Also, she doesn't believe other chemicals in vaccines are harmful.

Now the anti vaxxers have a fighting point that is going to resonate with people who feel stongly against abortion. I was strongly pro vaccinations until reading this.

a reply to: Look2theSacredHeart

Not really, this hit the MSM about 6 years ago. The Catholic church has officially stated that it is O.K. because no other option is currently available.

Also, the DNA is from babies aborted over 40 years ago.

a reply to: anton74

I don't believe its secret, its just not something you hear about often. I only added Dr. Pro-life because ABC News did not list Hepatitis A and Chickenpox Vaccinations. Thanks for the info on her and clarifying her objective

originally posted by: gmoneystunt
a reply to: anton74

I don't believe its secret, its just not something you hear about often. I only added Dr. Pro-life because ABC News did not list Hepatitis A and Chickenpox Vaccinations. Thanks for the info on her and clarifying her objective

No problem, I only learned because of another thread on her. Her research methods in trying to prove a link where done in a way as to achieve the desired results. She even admits she can't back them up.

I would rather they do this than use cells from monkeys like the polio vaccine that led to unintentional SV40 infections.

a reply to: gmoneystunt

There are medications, such as myoblock that not only contain humain derivitives but if you call they will tell you that communicable diseases may be transmitted from them.

I kept the migraines. Most people never go further than realizing they don't understand what the information is saying. Everything has a phone number for questions or comments.

Maybe that's what causes the DNA conflicts.

Thanks for the info, I might give you a star but I might get told off for handing out stars. I have been reading a lot lately bout the human cells been used for vaccines, and I was thinking maybe the aborted babies had genetic autism which has been continued to be produced when they keep growing the cells, if you keep growing cells surely they must still contain the DNA of the original soul person they came from, hence each vaccine someone receives gets some of the original aborted being, when a baby receives goodness knows how many vaccines over their short childhood each time they get a little more of the DNA of another person who maybe had genetic autism or cancer or who knows what other genetic problems that original cell line had. I was thinking maybe they could take cells from each baby's umbilcal cord to grow to make all the huge amount of vaccines they are supossed to receive out of their own cells, then maybe they could make the vaccine fresh without having to use Mercury thermosel or what ever other toxic preservitives they feel they have to use. I'm not so good on proper sentences or paragraphs sorry for ranting.

All that means is that if you have had this vaccine you are receiving blood products from a dead baby sacrificed to satan. Or at least that's the way the satanists view it, for those who have ever been to an anti-abortion demonstration. Yes satanists are known to stand outside abortion clinics declaring each dead baby a sacrifice to their god.

Other than that I wouldn't be alarmed......

There are two cell-lines derived from aborted fetuses.
These were derived in the 1960's (yes, 50 years ago) and were from 2 (yes, two) fetuses which were planned abortions due to medical complications with the mothers.
The mothers also consented to them being used.
www.historyofvaccines.org...

"Vaccines Developed Using Human Cell Strains

The first vaccine created with the use of human cell strains was the rubella vaccine developed by Stanley Plotkin at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia.

In 1941, Australian ophthalmologist Norman Gregg first realized that congenital cataracts in babies were the result of their mothers being infected with rubella during pregnancy. Along with cataracts, it was eventually determined that congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) could also cause deafness, heart disease, encephalitis, mental retardation, and pneumonia, among many other conditions. At the height of a rubella epidemic that began in Europe and spread to the United States in the mid-1960s, Plotkin calculated that 1% of all births at Philadelphia General Hospital were affected by congenital rubella syndrome. In some cases, women who were infected with rubella while pregnant terminated their pregnancies due to the serious risks from CRS.

Following one such abortion, the fetus was sent to Plotkin at the laboratory he had devoted to rubella research. Testing the kidney of the fetus, Plotkin found and isolated the rubella virus. Separately, Leonard Hayflick (also working at the Wistar Institute at that time) developed a cell strain using lung cells from an aborted fetus. Many viruses, including rubella, grew well in the resulting cell strain, and it proved to be free of contaminants. The strain was eventually called WI-38.

Plotkin grew the rubella virus he had isolated in WI-38 cells kept at 86°F (30°C), so that it eventually grew very poorly at normal body temperature. (He chose the low temperature approach following previous experiences with attenuating poliovirus.) After the virus had been grown through the cells 25 times at the lower temperature, it was no longer able to replicate enough to cause illness in a living person, but was still able to provoke a protective immune response. This rubella vaccine is still used in the United States today as part of the combined MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine."

Since these original two there have been no further need for any fetus cells to be used.

There is no aborted baby DNA in vaccines the same way there is no soil from the ground in an apple.

originally posted by: gmoneystunt

Dr. Paul Offit, the director of the vaccine education center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia said "There are perhaps nanograms of DNA fragments still found in the vaccine, perhaps billionths of a gram"

You conveniently left out the rest of the quote:

And to remove human fibroblast cells entirely from vaccines is out of the question, Offit explained, noting they are necessary because human viruses don't grow well in animal cells.

"They have also been tested for safety and the fetal cells can go through many more divisions than most other cells before dying," he said.

a reply to: GetHyped

I am not sure that I am following your point. I was trying to keep my post short. The rest of the quote you added says they cannot remove human cells and why. Also my post had nothing to do with safety and that was not the intention of my post either

First of all this reply is in genuine interest, it is not said or written in a snarky tone, But how do you know that there is no dna from the original babies remaining in the cells still being used, are you some specialised person who is checking out the cells with the correct equipment, or is that what big pharma has led you to believe. We all know that the medical pharma people lie about stuff, have you read the Henriette Lacks story? a reply to: Pardon?

originally posted by: Cloudbuster
First of all this reply is in genuine interest, it is not said or written in a snarky tone, But how do you know that there is no dna from the original babies remaining in the cells still being used, are you some specialised person who is checking out the cells with the correct equipment, or is that what big pharma has led you to believe. We all know that the medical pharma people lie about stuff, have you read the Henriette Lacks story? a reply to: Pardon?

No I don't test them. Do you?
The reason I know has nothing to do with big pharma but with cell biology and my comprehension of the science behind that.
It's more appropriate to say that because someone doesn't understand that science doesn't mean they should dismiss or not believe it.

The Henriette Lacks story has nothing to do with the cell lines cultured for vaccines.