Stars Can't Be Seen from Outer Space

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: ConnectDots

So, why can't stars been seen from space?

Because shadow governments!

originally posted by: Box of Rain

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: ConnectDots

So, why can't stars been seen from space?

Because shadow governments!

Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing that up.

Silliness and ridicule does not negate the reality of suppressed science because of imposed secrecy from vested interests.

Paying attention to whistleblowers is the only way to learn what's really going on.

a reply to: ConnectDots

Unless those whistleblowers aren't actually telling the truth. Then you won't learn what's actually going on, but be led down a path of lies.

a reply to: TerryDon79
People never make stuff up. 'specially whistleblowers.

It's a rule.

originally posted by: ConnectDots
Silliness and ridicule does not negate the reality of suppressed science because of imposed secrecy from vested interests.

Silliness and ridicule are our last resort when faced with outrageous claims backed up by absolutely no evidence. Such as that light can't be seen in space, or indeed that science is suppressed by vested interests.

We aren't Internet trolls that revel in silliness and ridicule. We're scientifically-minded people, and
all we want is at least a shred of evidence, some sort of workable hypothesis that's based on something tangible.

a reply to: TerryDon79

It is true that one must evaluate the veracity of all sources of information, including academia and national news broadcasts.

But that doesn't excuse dismissing whistleblowers because what they say doesn't match what you're assuming is normal and accurate.

Ridicule and silliness speaks loud and clear that truth is not the goal.

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: TerryDon79

It is true that one must evaluate the veracity of all sources of information, including academia and national news broadcasts.

Like evaluating if stars can be seen from space? Which science tells us they can, with EVIDENCE. Have you got any evidence of the contrary?

But that doesn't excuse dismissing whistleblowers because what they say doesn't match what you're assuming is normal and accurate.

The exact same thing can be said for your (and others) preconceived notions about stars being seen in space despite there being a mountain of EVIDENCE saying they are.

Ridicule and silliness speaks loud and clear that truth is not the goal.

Thats an assumption based on your bias.

a reply to: TerryDon79

You're asking for mainstream answers to fit your paradigm.

You want a response that fits neatly into what you dish out.

In a culture of lying and deception, which is what we're living in, the mainstream paradigm gets truth-seeking individuals nowhere worth going; a discussion within the mainstream paradigm is an exercise in futility.

And meaningless babble based on ridicule and silliness is equally ridiculous.

There's nothing to talk about, apparently.

We might as well be speaking two different languages without an interpreter.

a reply to: ConnectDots

So I'll take that as "I don't have any evidence so I'll just babble and hopefully they will forget the question they asked".

So, where's the evidence that stars CAN'T be seen from space? I've asked a few times and you constantly dodge it. Or is this a case of "Well they lied once, so they must always be lying" rubbish?

a reply to: TerryDon79

The evidence lies in the research of people you reject.

So as far as you're concerned, there is no evidence.

So, that's the end of the discussion, isn't it?

a reply to: ConnectDots

You mean the "evidence" that has been shown to be false?

Well done.

I'll ask again. Where's the evidence that stars CAN'T be seen from space? You must have something other than crying and whining.

a reply to: ConnectDots

you keep using those words " evidence " and " research " - its now clear you have not got a clue what they mean

The subject matter of this thread is the tip of the iceberg of falsehoods in mainstream science.

It is a waste of time to try to discuss scientific evidence in any area, not just the visible light portion of the EM spectrum, because there is so much hidden, forbidden knowledge.

If tenacious research is not done via. sources alternative to the mainstream, there really is nothing to talk about.

End of discussion.

a reply to: ConnectDots

Oh look. Still no evidence.

Why can't stars be seen from space? You must have some evidence. You don't just believe it because it's opposite of the mainstream, do you?

Come on! Show us some evidence.

originally posted by: ConnectDots

The subject matter of this thread is the tip of the iceberg of falsehoods in mainstream science.

It is a waste of time to try to discuss scientific evidence in any area, not just the visible light portion of the EM spectrum, because there is so much hidden, forbidden knowledge.

For people willing to invest some money (and a great deal of time) in order to be well-informed, there are two whistleblowers re. the secret space program who will educate you about true science and technology giving interviews at the website Gaia.com.

They are William Tompkins and Corey Goode.

Do your own research on who these people are.

If you do it yourself, it means more to you.

a reply to: ConnectDots

So now you want people to PAY to prove YOUR point?

Wow!

a reply to: TerryDon79

Guess what?

Some of us are here on ATS for something other than entertainment!

Also, this thread will come up when people do google searches.

ATS is a valuable resource for seekers.

a reply to: ConnectDots

oh dear - you cite " corey goode " - as your source of " evidence " - thanks for demonstrating your total lack of any critical thinking

a reply to: ConnectDots

Guess what?

You still haven't given any EVIDENCE that stars can't be seen from space.