It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GaryN
There is no gap in the light spectrum
Light created in the atmospheres of planets or moons WILL travel in the vacuum - GaryN
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: choos
a reply to: sadang
you dont actually think for yourself when all you do is agree with GaryN, you are just basically accepting his views because you cant think of any yourself, if you were thinking for yourself you would be asking where GaryN is wrong and only if you cant find anything wrong with his theories then you would agree.. unfortunately you wont even acknowledge (the same goes for GaryN) that you both agree that the moon is both visible and invisible.
I consider the quotes that GaryN uses of Neil misinterpretations because when I am fully night adapated in the country side on a cloudless night i would also describe the night sky as black.. unless you want me to describe the stars as well?
there is also no indication from GaryN to consider if Neil was talking about being in a brightly lit command module or the day lit side of the lunar surface.. is there any reason why?
regardless of what you think CCD does, SOHO has imaged the solar corona in the visible electromagnetic spectrum from the sun-earth L1 point. therefore visible electromagnetic spectrum IS BEING EMITTED FROM THE SUN
a reply to: GaryN
No, your statement is the outright lie. There are no visible wavelenght photographs of the Sun from SOHO.
is the Solar Corona emitted from the sun??
is it in the visible wavelength as captured by SOHO??
if the answer to both is yes the sun is emitting light from the visible spectrum. therefore my statement is not a lie.
originally posted by: sadang
a reply to: 3danimator2014
- no you can't really, you just think and say you can!
- as well as others here you don't ask nothing from what is unclear, you always have certitudes, even if such a thing as "certitudes" does not exist!
- but of course you all have the rights to think and manifest as you wish
- and of course I'll ever agree with the main idea of GaryN, namely that stars can't be seen in the outer space, not to oppose to the mainstream "certitudes" but because this is an impossibility.
originally posted by: sadang
- why do you consider my idea should revolutionize something or to earn a multitude of prizes (this argument tell something very crude about your values in life and your education), and maybe not just native fit in the natural laws of the Universe? perhaps because you consider a certitude that a star should emit visible light, as it is seen, analyzed, interpreted, understood and used here on Earth?
originally posted by: sadang
- and of course I'll ever agree with the main idea of GaryN, namely that stars can't be seen in the outer space, not to oppose to the mainstream "certitudes" but because this is an impossibility.
originally posted by: sadang
- "we know human eyes can detect..." in the Earth's environment. further responses find yourself alone
originally posted by: sadang
a reply to: Box of Rain
- "we know human eyes can detect..." in the Earth's environment. further responses find yourself alone
originally posted by: GaryN
This will be my last post, ever, on ATS, many will be glad to hear.
After examining all the evidence, particularly the quotes from astronauts who have said it is black out there in cislunar space,
..snip...
The most glaring, or not, example of the ridiculousness of it all is of course the lack of a photograph of the Sun from cislunar space, followed by the lack of photos of the planets form cislunar space, and then the stars.
Even from the ISS cupola there is a problem not many notice, and that is the visibility of Mars. We have photos taken from the Cupola showing the Moon, Venus and Jupiter, looking through Earths atmosphere of course.
news.nationalgeographic.com...
I don't see one of Mars though, or Saturn. The reason I believe is that Mars would look white when seen from the cupola, not red as we see it from Earth. Saturn can be a difficult astro-photography subject from Earth due to atmospherics, but that should not be a problem from the ISS, should it?
And of course the fact that NASA will not give camera EXIF data for their images if it would be possible for someone to notice that something was amiss, exposure times being the easiest to spot. So, I do have to thank some of the members here for making me double and even triple check my findings, but I have so far not found any obvious faults with what I claim. Only experiments can lift one of those veils Armstrong talked of, but perhaps Iran will one day be able to offer the proof, if they are ever allowed to leave LEO, which I doubt.
I'm happy to think that perhaps even one or two ATS members might have begun to see the holes in NASAs stories and deceptions, and so long as the posts that I and others have made concerning the matter remain on the Internet, then others who in the future may ask about the subject will have much to consider. Of course they must make up their own minds, but at least it is not just a one sided story any more. Peace.
originally posted by: sadang
- it's your right to agree or not with anyone as well as it's also your duty to not impose others your point of view. the same for me!
originally posted by: GaryN
...I don't see one of Mars though, or Saturn. The reason I believe is that Mars would look white when seen from the cupola, not red as we see it from Earth. Saturn can be a difficult astro-photography subject from Earth due to atmospherics, but that should not be a problem from the ISS, should it?
originally posted by: xGerhardSAx
By the logic that you cannot see stars or other objects in outer space because of the vacuum is illogical. You want to tell me if you step into Nasa's vacuum chamber, and suck out all the air (which makes it a vacuum if you were wondering GaryN), it will be pitch black? Even though the lights are on? Come on man! Stop being an eggplant!