It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ConnectDots
originally posted by: wildespace
That stars (or any other visible light) are invisible in space is a stupid "alternative theory", mostly propagated by Eric Dollard (and our own GaryN on ATS), and is based on misunderstanding and misrepresentation.
Just for the record, the highlighted “Eric Dollard” is actually Peter Lindemann.
Here is the YouTube of the same video:
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: GaryN
Put simply, it is the slit/pinhole that creates the photons the sensor needs to operate. Without the slit/pinhole. the detector would see nothing.
originally posted by: sadang
while both Newton and Einstein were not sure about anything
Objects can only be seen when that lights strikes the object and then is reflected back into our eyes.
A space based telescope with conventional optics will not see anything in space, which is why there isn't one, and NASA will not allow anyone to try it to find out. These guys tried their best, permission denied.
www.skyandtelescope.com...
So far, the response to the idea from NASA and Boeing (the ISS's main contractor) has been enthusiastic
originally posted by: GaryN
Peter Lindemann doesn't have it right either. There is no visible light coming from the Sun to reflect off anything. Visible light is only created by interaction with a column of matter, such as an atmoshere.
Collins reports: "Houston, it's been a real change for us. Now we are able to see stars again and recognize constellations for the first time on the trip. The sky is full of stars, just like the nights on Earth. But all the way here we have just been able to see stars occasionally and perhaps through monoculars, but not recognize any star pattern."
Anders said they were in darkness as they were, "just starting to go around, behind the moon, still in contact with the Earth, but in the shadow of not only the sun but also Earth shine, Earth shine being six times brighter than moon shine."
It was at that time Anders looked out of his window and, "saw all these stars, more stars than you could pick out constellations from," and suddenly there was the moon.
1) Does the slit cause the nearly-flat incoming waves to amplify/accentuate to more detectable levels?
2) Since massive bodies, such as the earth and moon, bend incoming cosmic rays, they allow visibility within their atmosphere?
3) Once you get far enough away from massive bodies, or simply look in a direction away from them while in a spaceship, you will see complete blackness because it is essentially "outside" the interconnected visible web of the cosmos? I hope these words convey what I am trying to say.
What will happen if the European, Russian, or Indian public try to launch an optical space telescope?
When commercial manned spaceflight takes off, who would prevent astronauts from looking out into space when they're in a planet's or a moon's shadow?
a reply to: Phage
That was in 2003 apparently.
What happened?
That's what I understood Peter Lindemann to be saying, actually.
"... Earth shine being six times brighter than moon shine."
It was at that time Anders looked out of his window and, "saw all these stars, more stars than you could pick out constellations from," and suddenly there was the moon.
originally posted by: GaryN
Without the solar radiation, the stars dim and then disappear, as can be seen in the series of images.
www.lpi.usra.edu...
There is no visible light coming from the Sun to reflect off anything. Visible light is only created by interaction with a column of matter, such as an atmoshere.
originally posted by: choos
originally posted by: GaryN
Without the solar radiation, the stars dim and then disappear, as can be seen in the series of images.
www.lpi.usra.edu...
if you are talking about the series of images from A17-159-23909 to A17-159-23911.. those white streaks are NOT stars.
originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Box of Rain
He wont answer I posted a picture taken in the vacuum chamber and the Astronaut is clearly seen.
originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: sadang
Is your quote quoting a member or an external source?