Waynos actually i read about the PIRATE and found nothing to any indication of it being better than anything we have?
I would never be so foolhardy as to claim it is 'better than anything' America has. What I said was that America currently has nothing in service
with the same
sort of capability, ie an IRST that has anything like the range and sensitivity, the ability to scan and individually track
separate targets whilst prioritising them, just like a radar does, and which works equally effectively in the A2A and A2G roles and which meshes
seamlessly with the radars own processing systems to enhance its abilities. Unless you know of one I have missed?
Westy, you are correct, it hasn't been ruled out that such an item will be fitted at some point and the current priority is the F-22'S radar,
however it was put on the back burner for cost, rather than operational reasons and was part of the original spec, pretty much like the RAF
Typhoon's cannon
Regarding the radar being better or not, I am just guessing but I reckon the AESA equipped APG-63 variants will have advantages in beam agility and
all versions will be very reliable from the V1 onwards due to the huge experience gained with the set over previous years with earlier versions,
indeed the V1 was created as a result of a drive to improve reliability, rather than performance.
The CAPTOR is
designed to be at least as good, if not better, than the non AESA versions with the CAESAR model being the equivalent to these,
but whether or not it
actually is better I'm not in a position to say, especially as its actual performance parameters are classified, apart
from the odd titbit of information such as a fighter sized target being successfully tracked from 86nm away at a deflection of 130 degrees. This
isn''t saying its a maximum, just that it has been achieved.
I do know that the US APG-65 radar was evaluated for the Luftwaffe 'Typhoon 2000' but was rejected. I suppose its not just a case of which one is
'better', but which one meets the needs of the force that has to use it?
[edit on 25-9-2006 by waynos]