It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GhosTBR55
Ok i have one question. From all this info you pointed out. Are you saying that an SU-30 is better than a Typhoon because what you state a SU-30 is clearly just as powerful if not more because it has the WVR Superiorty? So the SU-37 will be better than the Typhoon? Thats what your info is stating. I could only agree with the WVR statement but i still feel its not better than a TYPHOON , RAF and a JSF.
Originally posted by JFrazier
I don't want to get into the whole thing but basically the chine on the nose of the F-22 acts like a virtual surface. It has no need for canards. The F-22's FBW system couples all contol surfaces in a way no other fighters does. It can do the Cobra, high alpha loops, helipcopters, etc. A Raptor squadron commander says that he has no problems doing Russian manuevers.
Also, those rudders are huge for a reason. The F-22 has exceeded a 30 degrees/sec yaw rate.
Well I have seen the F-22 and yes it climbs like no other. As many in the F-22 program have said, "It's just the tip of the iceburg."
Originally posted by GhosTBR55
Ok i have one question. From all this info you pointed out. Are you saying that an SU-30 is better than a Typhoon because what you state a SU-30 is clearly just as powerful if not more because it has the WVR Superiorty? So the SU-37 will be better than the Typhoon? Thats what your info is stating. I could only agree with the WVR statement but i still feel its not better than a TYPHOON , RAF and a JSF.
5 Flankers (Su 30s?) vs. one F-22 doesn't result in 5 roasted ducks(Maybe 4 flankers and one F-22 but thats still hard to believe!). Give me a scenario. What is the BVR AMRAAM payload for a F-22?
Originally posted by JFrazier
I don't want to get into the whole thing but basically the chine on the nose of the F-22 acts like a virtual surface. It has no need for canards. The F-22's FBW system couples all contol surfaces in a way no other fighters does. It can do the Cobra, high alpha loops, helipcopters, etc. A Raptor squadron commander says that he has no problems doing Russian manuevers.
Also, those rudders are huge for a reason. The F-22 has exceeded a 30 degrees/sec yaw rate.
Well I have seen the F-22 and yes it climbs like no other. As many in the F-22 program have said, "It's just the tip of the iceberg."
Originally posted by GhosTBR55
DARKPRO
BTW F-22A will not be sold because its just to valuble to do something that stupid.
Canards were not used for radar return reasons as far as I am aware, but I don't think handling suffered much with the inclusion of TVC.
Originally posted by JFrazier
The F-22 doesn't really need canards as those tailplanes provide enough pitch authority as they are. I would ventures to guess that the Flanker doesn't really need them either. The MiG-29OVT doesn't seem to mind not having them.
Kilcoo, do you know why Sukhoi engineers decided to use canards on some of the Flankers? I heard something about the Su-35 not needing them because its FCS was improved or something like that...
That's means he's getting (assuming?) a 100% kill ratio for all his AMRAAMs? Or did he close in and take some out with AIM-9Xs? or were they AIM-9Ms?Can you carry six AMRAAMs and AIM-9s along with that?
F-22 can definitely take out a couple of opponents of the Su-30 genre by firing salvo couplets at each target, but beyond that it will be difficult as the remaining a/c have a general idea of the situation and can execute a number of possible anti-stealth configurations taht we can be most assured are being honed in AFs around the world. Were the F-16s flying to pre-desgined anti-stealth tactics or just flying to regular interceptor regimes.
Also for a F-22 coming head on, it would be pretty difficult to avoid the detection on the N011M, and then get 'behind' the opponent a/c at ranges required to fire the AIM-9 (20km max?). At this range even your graphical chart shows that the N011M is capable of detecting RCS of under 0.001 sq meters (more in the range of 0.0001 sq meters). Also one needs to check the RWR capabilities of the Su-30s which vary from a/c with Russia, India and China.
Originally posted by JFrazier
The F-22 doesn't really need canards as those tailplanes provide enough pitch authority as they are. I would ventures to guess that the Flanker doesn't really need them either.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Well then that's really sad for those F-16s..
That's means he's getting (assuming?) a 100% kill ratio for all his AMRAAMs?
Or did he close in and take some out with AIM-9Xs? or were they AIM-9Ms?Can you carry six AMRAAMs and AIM-9s along with that?
What was the avionics suite and weapons loadout simulated on the F-16s?
The F-22 can definitely take out a couple of opponents of the Su-30 genre by firing salvo couplets at each target, but beyond that it will be difficult as the remaining a/c have a general idea of the situation and can execute a number of possible anti-stealth configurations taht we can be most assured are being honed in AFs around the world.
Were the F-16s flying to pre-desgined anti-stealth tactics or just flying to regular interceptor regimes.
The N011M , powerful as it is, can most defintely be used to effect the same with data feed being passed around the still standing a/c.
Also for a F-22 coming head on, it would be pretty difficult to avoid the detection on the N011M, and then get 'behind' the opponent a/c at ranges required to fire the AIM-9 (20km max?). At this range even your graphical chart shows that the N011M is capable of detecting RCS of under 0.001 sq meters (more in the range of 0.0001 sq meters). Also one needs to check the RWR capabilities of the Su-30s which vary from a/c with Russia, India and China.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
If the Americans don't want anyone playing with their toys, what is wrong with Russia selling theirs? The other platforms (Rafale, EF-2000) aren't quite ready to roll of the assembly line in droves, but Mikoyan-Gurevich and Sukhoi have theirs ready for production now. MiG 29 OVT, for example.
Originally posted by GhosTBR55
-There was another scenario where a F-22A shot down 5 Typhoons. It was brought up here once before. Cant remeber anything about it jsut the numbers.
-Its been proven that a Typhoon can shoot down (BVR) 4 SU-35 before it being shoot down its self, F-15C 2 to 1 and a F-22A 10 to 1.
-I agree that the SU 30/35 arent inferior but there not in the ball game as a F-22A no matter what your trying to say. The SU 30/35 are still comparable to F-15 not to Typhoons and 22A s.
Originally posted by JFrazier
There have been no reports of a Raptor shooting down 5 Typhoons. Those were 5 F-15Cs.
Originally posted by GhosTBR55
Nope 5 typhoons.
Originally posted by GhosTBR55
ridiculus questions, and what your tring to prove is ridiculus.
-Its not sad for a F-22A to take down 6 F-16. This is a F-22A youre talkin about, this is expected. and yes of course the F-22A can carry aim-9 s with aim-120 under the bay. Matter of fact it can carry 2 AIM-9x and 6 AIM-120C.
-The avionics layout and combat config where standard for any situation.
-Dont act like the F-16 were at a disadvantage, actually had the advantage of having 6 F-16.
-What is this new Anti stealth config uve been yappin about? Never heard of it and never will happen. Its either you have stealth or not, thats the counter.
-What makes you think the Russian Radar is so powerful? The F-15C its self has a better radar.
-You gotta understand that chart more. Just because the Russian NO11m can target under .001 doesnt mean it will ever target a F-22A before being blown up and rendered dead.
-There was another scenario where a F-22A shot down 5 Typhoons. It was brought up here once before. Cant remeber anything about it jsut the numbers.
-Its been proven that a Typhoon can shoot down (BVR) 4 SU-35 before it being shoot down its self, F-15C 2 to 1 and a F-22A 10 to 1.
-I agree that the SU 30/35 arent inferior but there not in the ball game as a F-22A no matter what your trying to say. The SU 30/35 are still comparable to F-15 not to Typhoons and 22A s.