It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dima
for the AMRAAM, maybe you mean that it has a passive seeker, the AA-12 also has that, actually, F-15 pilots mentioned that when they went up against the Indian aircraft in COPE India, they never knew when they were being illuminated...
Awww c'mon man !!! Now your pulling rabbits outve a hat again!!...IMHO Indians are the best MiG 29 pilots and the PAF is quite good with its F-16s too..so that would be a good match-up..The RSAF F-16s were also put up against IAF jets but the damn results are classified!!!!
also this flip many switches thing sounds a little funny to be true..you got sources on that reaction time comparision between russian and american jets???
Even if u put 5 su -47 against 5 f14 i gaurentee that the f 14 will win and still have half still remainin if not all.
2 f18 superhornet (come on guys its replacing The best record Fighter the f15)
6 f35 (dont really care about it cause its more for export and its a jsf)
Rafale (Honestly this plane is better than the Typhoon)
8 Typhoon
And The typhoon is being over exagerated... i mean for all the countries that partnered for one plane... its like they just caught up to the f14... okay it might be better than the f 14 MAYBE HA! and just so everyone noes, in those fighter war games (sorry i dont no the name) the f22 took out 5 typhoons!
Originally posted by Pazo
Thanks waynos, for saving others from the tedious task of answering the above piece of art. That guy sounds a lot like George W. I think it's him posting on ATS under a pseudonym. I mean, the IQ's match... and the guy is really patriotic 'n stuff... must be George W.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
I hate to burst your bubble, but the biggest reason the F-14 was retired was because the Pheonix developed cracks, causing them to blow up when they launched, or in flight and was retired. And the Pheonix had at BEST a 70% hit ratio at long range. The farther the range, the lower the accuracy. The Tomcat was built around the Pheonix, and when they went away, they were just trying to find missions for them to keep flying.
As far as the F-18 being worse, IT IS. Until the E/F came along the Hornet had a 45 minute time off the deck before having to refuel. That's under NORMAL MISSION FLIGHT, we're not talking in constant dogfights or high speed. Even the E/F has horrible range problems.
You seem to think that the F-14 was and is the best thing to come along since sliced bread. Yes the Tomcat was good, WHEN USED FOR ITS MISSION. However, it also had major problems right up until they retired them. They had engine problems throughout the life of the plane that caused several to be lost, along with other issues. It's not, and never was a BAD plane, but it was never as incredible as you seem to think it was.
And what Waynos said was how can you have one plane that still in workup listed lower down your list BECAUSE they haven't seen combat, but still have the F-22 at the top of the list, when IT hasn't seen combat either. If you're going to move one plane down the list because it's just becoming operational and hasn't seen combat, you can't have another one that is in the same position at the top of your list.
[edit on 6/9/2006 by Zaphod58]
Originally posted by spacemunkey
What is the current top 5 of Air superiority fighters currently in service or about to come into service within, say the next 2 years?
1.He said what does jdf mean???
Man are u kiddin? who gave u this kind of lie??? The f-14 can take it out 100 miles away at tops~~~!
4. Ok your right that the typhoon does do things better than the rafela BUT ITS defintly vice versa.
oter people actually belieave and pretend to say that u make sense.
Originally posted by waynos
1.He said what does jdf mean???
No, I did not. I asked what YOU meant.
Man are u kiddin? who gave u this kind of lie??? The f-14 can take it out 100 miles away at tops~~~!
If that Flanker hadn't taken the F-14 out first, or don't you believe the Flanker could do this?
4. Ok your right that the typhoon does do things better than the rafela BUT ITS defintly vice versa.
What does this mean? I only speak English.
Your comparative figures for the Rafale and Typhoon are very different to mine, which show the Typhoon to have an edge in virtually every respect (but no more than an edge, I am not decrying the Rafale). I have never seen the Book you mention but I take my figures from 'Jane's All The Worlds Aircraft'.
As for the rest of it, I'm afraid it is incomprehensible gibberish and after trying to make sense of what you said so I could try and answer you I had to give it up as a bad job, so ironically;
oter people actually belieave and pretend to say that u make sense.
Rest assured that nobody will ever accuse you of that.