It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Its not about sites..its about the technology...the Janes article(s) you've been referring to are probably comparing the F-15 with AESA to the Su-30Ka..and not MKI...Mmoreover the MKI the IAF has is israeli avionics fitted, not plain old ruskie stuff...so comparisions based on technology are not conclusive because there is no scope for comparision, no level ground...also another thing the outnumbering of USAF aircraft in Cope India is a part of the Exercise not a ploy...offensive teams ALWAYS outnumber defensive ones by at least a 2:1 ratio to hope for any chance of success...
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Anybody with a brain wouldn't shoot off w/o knowing all data present at hand..a brain you severely seem to lack...
and which part of Russia are you from?..The part thats aleady defected to america?
If Janes says superior and not only in tech then in what, manuverability?..airframe..? rate of climb? what dude.. superior in what??
No specs no data nothing..just SUPERIOR...superior ego thats what!!!
Originally posted by waynos
Its not about sense, its about money, don't forget the original plan was to buy 750 F-22's to replace ALL the F-15's because the USAF knew that the Eagle was getting long in the tooth and about to be overhauled by several new fighters.
They are only keeping the F-15 in service because its cheaper than the F-22, of which it seems there will only be a nominal amount purchased.
Avionics upgrades certainly help a great deal but they can only go so far, the Air Fiorce and the industry knows this. Otherwise the F-22 would never have been started.
Its not about sense, its about money, don't forget the original plan was to buy 750 F-22's to replace ALL the F-15's because the USAF knew that the Eagle was getting long in the tooth and about to be overhauled by several new fighters.
They are only keeping the F-15 in service because its cheaper than the F-22, of which it seems there will only be a nominal amount purchased.
Avionics upgrades certainly help a great deal but they can only go so far, the Air Fiorce and the industry knows this. Otherwise the F-22 would never have been started.
Originally posted by Hockeyguy567
Maybe you have a comprehension problem.
It said the Eagle had the advantage in the following areas: speed, radar, weapons and situational awarness, not to mention ECM, but the Eagle pilots could not use them in Cope India, and the AMRAAM was limited to 32km.
The Su-30MKI has the advantage in agility and high aero alpha, and that's it, do your research before you start to babble, you have no argument anyway just personal attacks, grow up kiddo.
[edit on 9-1-2005 by Hockeyguy567]
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
I don't think you even got the point, Waynos. The F-15 is perfectly capable of handling any current Russian plane. If it wasn't there'd be no reason to keep it around. It's be better to buy an extra 100 Raptors.
Originally posted by Dima
it didn't even fight against the F-15, all in all, the F-15 got its candy ass whooped, let me try and calculate the odds again.
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
So, we'll keep a useless plane around? Most enemies America would be fighting in the near future would have a Flanker. What good would a F-15 do if its outclassed by it?
I don't think you even got the point, Waynos. The F-15 is perfectly capable of handling any current Russian plane. If it wasn't there'd be no reason to keep it around. It's be better to buy an extra 100 Raptors.
Your argument that if the F-15 is outclassed then it would be better to can it and buy 100 extra Raptors ignores the fact that the USAF needs a certain number of aiircraft in order to maintain its 'presence' in the world. With 500 less fighters than it has now (ie 150 +100 Raptors minus 750 F-15's - round figures only for the sake of an example )this would be impossible.
The USAF would dearly love to replace all its F-15s with the F-22 because it knows the situation but the money is not there to do it. My view is that there is every possibility that this will happen over time with extra Raptors being bought over an extended period but it does not change the fact that the F-15 is past its sell by date, in terms of airframe and combat technology. Sure its avionics are as advanced as anybodies but if you put them in an F-4 it wouldn't make the F-4 better than the Flanker overall would it.
With improving deployability capabilities, and the amount of survivability F-22's have, the number of fighters doesn't need to be that high.
Rus and U.S. are schedgualed to go to WAR soon,
Do you work in the British Ministry of Defence by any chance, they been saying that very thing for forty years at least
You guys don't see anything do you if F-15 was supiriour than Sukoi then there would be no need for The U.S. to be making the F/22 AND they are making it because Rus and U.S. are schedgualed to go to WAR soon