posted on Dec, 17 2004 @ 10:17 AM
So the future homeland security secretary to be has a closet over flowing with skeltons. Bernard B. Kerik declined his nomination over "questions
about the immigration status of a person who had been in my employment," Basically meaning his nanny.
As reports began to dig deeper into the story they began to reveal that Kerik had an "undisclosed marriage, clandestine love affairs, unsavory
business ties and unreported gifts."
Could the nanny scenario/excuse be simply a smoke screen?
Only one of Keriks neighbors has come forth to comment on this mystery nanny under full anonymity. She described the children's playmate as a young,
olive-skinned woman who did not drive,
Could the nanny be under age?