Leaked? ... "Exec Amnesty in 24 States That Didn’t Join Lawsuit"

A majority of states (26) joined the lawsuit that led to a federal judge (Andrew Hanen) issuing an injunction against Obama’s executive amnesty last week.

The Obama administration complied with the injunction, did not accept applications for Obama’s executive amnesty, and asked Hanen for a stay before it files an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

But the White House, according to Gutierrez, is deciding whether it has the legal authority to launch its executive amnesty program in the 24 other states and the District of Columbia before the lawsuit is resolved.

Gutierrez Reveals

-
OBSERVATION: For some folks, this might be a ...

Sure-Fire ... Kick'em-Out-o-the-Bed ... Moment ???

( i.e. a wake-up call )
.

He will do everything possible to get around any law.

Flag and star for you. I just read the link. ALL States should say no to illegals and amnesty of any kind.

originally posted by: xuenchen
He will do everything possible to get around any law.

He is relentless!

a reply to: Night Star

I tell you what. I went into walmart and truth is, I could not find an employee who spoke English. I guess I am going to have to learn Spanish just to go freaking shopping.

a reply to: FarleyWayne

So now the Constitution's validity and interpretation is based state by state? It's no longer all encompassing?

I bet there's no authority in selective "State by State".

This is a Federal court action.

Sour Grapes and puppy petting by Obama and Guteriz.

Both are jealous maniacs.

I wonder why their bonehead lawyers didn't see this coming?

originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: FarleyWayne

So now the Constitution's validity and interpretation is based state by state? It's no longer all encompassing?

That's what Obama and Guteriz want people to think.

And many will just assume the Constitution is invalid at will.

a reply to: FarleyWayne

We should just tear the constitution into 50 pieces, put them all in a hat, and each state can draw a piece. What you get is what you get.

a reply to: Night Star

ALL States should say no to illegals and amnesty of any kind.

If they say no to them how is walmart going to bring back the jobs in the next ten years?

originally posted by: SkipperJohn
a reply to: Night Star

I tell you what. I went into walmart and truth is, I could not find an employee who spoke English. I guess I am going to have to learn Spanish just to go freaking shopping.

I am guessing that one of your complaints about "illegals" would be that they take jobs "Americans" could have and drive down wages. But here you are shopping at Wal-Mart that specializes in destroying other businesses and driving down wages. Hmmm.

a reply to: Night Star

He is the most DANGEROUS man to sit in the oval office in our nation's history.

l impeached him long ago.

The Obama/Guteriz Constitutional amendment proclamation....

originally posted by: SkipperJohn
a reply to: Night Star

I tell you what. I went into walmart and truth is, I could not find an employee who spoke English. I guess I am going to have to learn Spanish just to go freaking shopping.

What freaks me out is that I keep hearing stories like yours from other areas in the US. I cannot comprehend why any place should have employees speaking anything other than English here in the United States, unless it has to do with International dealings or translations.

There was a store around here once that tried putting up signs in Spanish for their isles. That didn't last long at all! A restaurant had coupons with Spanish on it and I noticed that didn't go over well either.

Until the onslaught of years of uncontrolled illegal immigration, we never had to deal with speaking any other language. Our legal immigrants had to learn and speak English. Most illegals don't care.

a reply to: SkipperJohn

You do not have to learn to speak Spanish to go shopping. Let the store know you will be shopping elsewhere where their employees speak the language of the land.

a reply to: Night Star

Although I do agree with your points. The US does not have an official language. The issue has been left up to the states so far, so its hard to make any points about the language issue from a legal standpoint.

Arizona finally made English their official language in 2006. The bill states that all official dealings with the AZ gov must be done in English, however this effect trickles down to just about nook and cranny, including grocery stores. I have noo problems ordering fast food or understanding employees living here.

a reply to: FarleyWayne

Were you an ATS member a few years ago and saw the thread about an artist showing Obama stomping the Constitution while ex-Presidents look on in various degrees of shock?

Some ATS members still think the artist is "racist" for doing the art piece...I think he us a hero and very brave American.

originally posted by: doompornjunkie
a reply to: Night Star

Although I do agree with your points. The US does not have an official language. The issue has been left up to the states so far, so its hard to make any points about the language issue from a legal standpoint.

Arizona finally made English their official language in 2006. The bill states that all official dealings with the AZ gov must be done in English, however this effect trickles down to just about nook and cranny, including grocery stores. I have noo problems ordering fast food or understanding employees living here.

That's just it, we shouldn't have to have laws about language. Immigrants who came here legally had to learn English. After too many years of uncontrolled illegal immigration, we then had problems and had to fight for it to be the official language and are still fighting for it.

If I moved to another Country where English wasn't spoken, I would never want to insult the citizens of that Country by forcing them to speak MY language. I would find that rude as hell. If I was hired at a store or anywhere else, I wouldn't in my wildest dreams expect any of the customers there to speak MY language. If I did, I would be rude and arrogant and disrespectful.

Here, we have hundreds of languages spoken, but most learn and speak English. It is what unites us and brings us together which is a good thing. We can't exactly expect every immigrant coming here to learn English and hundreds of other languages.

a reply to: Night Star

What other solution would you suggest? I mean we can't magically make rude people polite, but we can set standards for communication.

Most countries DO have official languages. I don't see how we should be different, if even on a state level.

I'm not trying to argue for or against illegal immigration. The feds have a monopoly on that issue and have failed us miserably. However like you said in your last paragraph English being the common language brought us together, so illegal immigration or not, why is declaring it as such a bad thing?

ETA: I actually think that the declaration of English as our official language would be crucial in any effective solution to combat illegal immigration given that the vast majority of illegals in the US come from Spanish speaking countries.

a reply to: doompornjunkie

that maybe so, but to become a legal citizen in the U.S. they require that if you don't speak english that you bring your own interpreter who is fluent in both english and your native language, and your required to take a english test. but the english test is kinda sad, you have to read just one out of three sentences correctly, and write just one out of three sentences correctly.