jihadunspun:3 US generals captured ;)))

www.jihadunspun.com.../home.php&

www.jihadunspun.com.../home.php&

these people as I see are much more better than comical ali

but anyway,do you have any good sources about situation in the city???few days ago there probably was something like a battle because of US casualties (8 in an-anbar province).do you know something about any kind of resistance now in Fallujah???

Im suprised Mokudishu, or how ever you spell his name, hasnt picked up on this and started preaching it as gosple. This is right up his ally That site is like getting your news from Fox News Network. Im glad you can see the lies. Some people actually believe this stuff.

Originally posted by gattaca
but anyway,do you have any good sources about situation in the city???few days ago there probably was something like a battle because of US casualties (8 in an-anbar province).do you know something about any kind of resistance now in Fallujah???

I think there is still resistance in Al-Anbar (which includes Fallujah).
A US Marine Corporal was killed there just yesterday by hostile fire.
Quite a few Marines have been killed there this week.

www.icasualties.org...

The US death toll for Iraq is now above 1,300.
The death rate for this month is 2.71 per day, the sixth highest rate for the war.

Man, thanks for the chuckle...

My favorite is still the bit about the Mujahadeen attacking the Americans with swords, and coming out with about a 10 to 1 victory....

Or the "despite their use of chemical weapons"...please... Every foreign news agency would be shouting that from the rafters....

I don't even think there are 3 US generals in all of Iraq,

No other link on the net supports these claims of 3 American Generals being captured as of this writing.

I hear the 3 Generals in question were escorting JFK and Marilyn Monroe to an Elvis concert hosted by Jimmy Dean.
Where do they come up with this nonsense?

Jihadunspun is a front for the CIA or other government agency.
www.twf.org...

You're laughing at US government propaganda, not Jihadist propaganda.

Originally posted by AceOfBase
Jihadunspun is a front for the CIA or other government agency.
www.twf.org...

You're laughing at US government propaganda, not Jihadist propaganda.

Its still funny though, i wouldnt even call it propaganda. More like light entertainment.
CIA needs to get some better script writers i think.

[edit on 17-12-2004 by Janus]

I dont think Jihadunspun has anything to do with any part of the American gov. The claims are to outragious to accomplish anything for Americas sake. The spin from this place is always slanted in the favor of the resistance. I think it could be part of some other gove that is agianst Americas actions in Iraq: France, Germany, and many others.

The thing about this site is the claims are so outragiuos that it may just be a joke site.

The CIA should hire Baghdad Bob away from France and let him spin up some of his famous quotes. One of my favorites:

April 5, 2003
"They are not near Baghdad. Don't believe them.... They said they entered with... tanks in the middle of the capital. They claim that they - I tell you, I... that this speech is too far from the reality. It is a part of this sickness of their plan. There is no an... - no any existence to the American troops or for the troops in Baghdad at all."

Originally posted by Kidfinger
I dont think Jihadunspun has anything to do with any part of the American gov. The claims are to outragious to accomplish anything for Americas sake.

Think of it this way, by making claims that are so outrageous and unsubstantiated, you make people wary of anything that the Islamic media or Jihadists have to say.
That does work in the favor of the US governement as no one will believe information coming out of that region unless it comes from a Western source.


[edit on 17-12-2004 by AceOfBase]

Originally posted by AceOfBase

Think of it this way, by making claims that are so outrageous and ubsubstantiated, you make people wary of anything that the Islamic media or Jihadists have to say.
That does work in the favor of the US governement as no one will believe information coming out of that region unless it comes from a Western source.

Did anyone really believe the news from the resistance anyway? I do see your point though, but its like thier beating a dead horse as no one in America truly believes anything that came from an Iraqi source anyway.

Originally posted by AceOfBase
Think of it this way, by making claims that are so outrageous and ubsubstantiated, you make people wary of anything that the Islamic media or Jihadists have to say.
That does work in the favor of the US governement as no one will believe information coming out of that region unless it comes from a Western source.

I agree with you, it is a nice way to keep people away from the Middle East media sources, including Al-Jazeera.

Keeping the people glue to only Fox news works very well for Mr.Bush.

i just wanted you to know that Henry V is, in my never-humble opinion, the greatest thing Shakespeare ever wrote....

...but I like the "Crispin Crispian" speech even better!

[edit on 17-12-2004 by Off_The_Street]

Originally posted by Off_The_Street
i just wanted you to know that Henry V is, in my never-humble opinion, the greatest thing Shakespeare ever wrote....

...but I like the "Crispin Crispian" speech even better!

[edit on 17-12-2004 by Off_The_Street]

I love Shakespeare, the St Crispins day speech is enough to get any Englishman's blood singing though his veins. Its nice that someone still appreciates the Bard.

Did anyone really believe the news from the resistance anyway? I do see your point though, but its like thier beating a dead horse as no one in America truly believes anything that came from an Iraqi source anyway.

yes..they do )) There are a lot o people who would belive in most stupid things we have ever heard )

iraqwar.mirror-world.ru...

as I remember there were some posts written by "zcheng" in ATS forum.He belived in these sources also,unfortunatelly I can't find them

Originally posted by AceOfBase
Jihadunspun is a front for the CIA or other government agency.
www.twf.org...

You're laughing at US government propaganda, not Jihadist propaganda.

And your taking this as a factoid based on what people are saying at www.libertyforum.org? Hmmm....

Speculative, at best, Ace, and as shown and indicated with the comments made on that particular thread mentioned at the board I mentioned. Furthemore, I guess you didn't read the second page and the comment of "Muslim":

It appears that you are claiming authorship of this article, which claims that JuhadUnspun.com (JUS) is some sort of CIA front.

Today, JUS has a rebuttal to this article on its front page.

JUS claims in its rebuttal to the article which you posted, was in fact written by Enver Masud, founder of The Wisdom Fund (www.twf.com).

---snip---

Which one is it? Am I correct in assuming that you are claiming to be the author of this article about JUS and the CIA? If that is the case, then JUS has apparently uncovered you as Enver Massud.

It remains to be seen if JUS is actually a CIA front. JUS's rebuttal raises some interesting points, but you have not quoted that rebuttal anywhere in this thread.

--snip--

An additional fact is that JUS has started streaming Alex Jones videos from its website. I think most people at Liberty Forum are aware of who Alex Jones is, and agree that there is no way that Alex Jones is a CIA asset (based on what he says about the CIA), nor is there any reason for a CIA front to stream Alex Jones videos such as "9/11: The Road to Tyranny" which directly blames the US Governmet for everything from Pearl Harbour, to the Oklahoma City bombing, to the 9/11 attacks. If JUS is a CIA front, why is it promoting such videos?

Doubt as to Jihadunspun being the CIA




seekerof


[edit on 17-12-2004 by Seekerof]

Originally posted by Gazrok


Or the "despite their use of chemical weapons"...please...

Every foreign news agency would be shouting that from the rafters....

The US is using napalm in Iraq. I don't know if that counts as 'chemical weapons' though. The funny thing is, if you google "naplam iraq" here is the first entry:

Pentagon denies report on napalm - Iraq - theage.com.au
... Pentagon has a denied a report in The Age on Saturday that napalm was used in an
attack by US Navy planes on an Iraqi position at Safwan Hill in southern Iraq. ...
www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/ 03/23/1048354475977.html?oneclick=true - 19k - Cached - Similar pages

US defends use of napalm-like firebombs - Iraq - theage.com.au
... Marines used the napalm-like bombs on at least two other occasions during the drive ...
river bridge north of the town of Numaniyah in south central Iraq, the San ...
www.theage.com.au/articles/ 2003/08/08/1060145835413.html - 27k - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.theage.com.au ]

If firebombs or FAE's are considered 'napalm', then so be it.
In some of the instances where 'napalm' has been claimed to have been used, it was nothing more than phospherous shells and smoke devices.
Bear in mind, that the use of 'napalm' was"

A 1980 UN convention banned the use against civilian targets of napalm, a terrifying mixture of jet fuel and polystyrene...

U.S. ADMITS NAPALM USE

So that outcry's of 'foul' can continue....
The U.S. is not signatory to this agreement.





seekerof

Originally posted by Seekerof
If firebombs or FAE's are considered 'napalm', then so be it.
In some of the instances where 'napalm' has been claimed to have been used, it was nothing more than phospherous shells and smoke devices.
Bear in mind, that the use of 'napalm' was"

A 1980 UN convention banned the use against civilian targets of napalm, a terrifying mixture of jet fuel and polystyrene...

U.S. ADMITS NAPALM USE
So that outcry's of 'foul' can continue....
The U.S. is not signatory to this agreement.
seekerof

Originally posted by Seekerof
it was nothing more than phospherous shells and smoke devices.

Explain to me how Phosphorous isnt as devestating as Napalm?

Originally posted by Seekerof
Bear in mind, that the use of 'napalm' was"
A 1980 UN convention banned the use against civilian targets of napalm, a terrifying mixture of jet fuel and polystyrene...

Explain to me how the City of Fallujah is not a civilian target?