It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Brandan Robertson had signed a deal last year with Destiny Image to publish his book, Nomad: Not-So-Religious Thoughts On Faith, Doubt, And The Journey In Between.
In January Robertson appeared in a TIME magazine article – Inside The Evangelical Fight Over Gay Marriage – in which he identified himself as a homosexual.
Last week when he turned in his manuscript, he quickly received a reply from his publisher who had 'concerns' about his 'media attention'.
He alleges that he was then asked to sign a statement that he does 'not condone, encourage, or accept the homosexual lifestyle'.
Robertson, who is also a spokesperson for Evangelicals for Marriage Equality, refused to sign the statement, and days later he was contacted by the publisher again and told that his book had been dropped.
According to Robertson, the publishers were concern that Christian retailers wouldn’t buy the book because of his public advocacy for gay and lesbian inclusion in Christian communities.
Destiny Image had previously agreed to publish the book last year, with no advance payment, after Robertson submitted a proposal while still a student at the conservative Moody Bible Institute in Chicago.
The book, described as a collection of essays on his personal spiritual journey from a fundamentalist to a progressive evangelical, makes only a glancing reference to homosexuality.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Anyafaj
He came out as a gay marriage advocate. The publisher has to protect their bottom line. If they are concerned about what it will do to their image as a publishing house to their clientele to continue to carry this book are they under any pressure to continue to publish it?
Or look at it this way, you are a caterer and agree to cater an event that you later find out is an event counter to the type of event you would want to have your name as a caterer associated with. Say the politician you agreed to cater for was discovered to be embroiled in a scandal of major proportions. Are you under any obligation to carry through even though you fear it might damage your reputation as a business caterer?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Anyafaj
In other words, you think that God was a discriminatory hater and so was Jesus because neither one of them approved of sexual immorality of any kind.
He'll be a pseudo-martyr for the moderate Christian community and the LGBT community...
His (future) sales just went through the metaphorical roof.
A recent TIME online article featured images of two prominent young leaders who self-identify as both “evangelical” and gay. Their mission: to expand the evangelical acceptance of same-sex marriage. Brandon Robertson is co-founder of Evangelicals for Marriage Equality, and Matthew Vines is founder of the Reformation Project and author of "God and the Gay Christian," a book that argues that the Bible accepts loving, committed same-sex unions.
They’re among the proof, said TIME, that acceptance of same-sex marriage among evangelicals is now inevitable. Consider this closing quote from a megachurch pastor: “Every positive reforming movement in church history is first labeled heresy . . . Evangelicalism is way behind on this. We have a debt to pay.” That’s a strange statement considering the many so-called “reform movements” that were first labeled heresy and still are.
And yet, the article still got me thinking: Does embracing same-sex marriage and homosexual conduct push one out of the evangelical fold? Does the shift on these issues point to larger problems within the historic movement known as evangelicalism?