It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So "they're next" not "their"? Their next implies ownership as in "their next move". They are next (they're). The statement looked like it was something else, so no sarcasm just bad grammar.
originally posted by: masqua
Oh, no...
A spelling mistake causes friction within a thread!
It seems to me that in the context of the posts, it was quite obvious what the intent was... a remark on Putin's desire to 'save' expats from rampaging fascist Eastern & Western Europeans by using young conscripts to facilitate his personal war in the Ukraine.
What's next... Estonia, Lithuania, Alberta?
originally posted by: masqua
originally posted by: sosobad
originally posted by: masqua
a reply to: sosobad
The reply I made is related to the Russian initiative to 'save' expTheussian speakers from persecution. In Alberta are tens of thousands of Ukrainian expats who are also Russian speakers.
Using the logic Putin put forward, then Alberta could be seen as a target even though the Ukrainians here are quite happy with their circumstances.
That... and Alberta is virtually floating on oil reserves.
Hope that clears it up.
So "they're next" not "their"? Their next implies ownership as in "their next move". They are next (they're). The statement looked like it was something else, so no sarcasm just bad crammer.
What's next... Estonia, Lithuania, Alberta?
It isn't the Kremlin, imho... it's the autocratic methods of Putin himself. That's who is pulling the strings here.
I've not said that Russia isn't a threat to NATO because I believe it is a threat.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stated that there was “no concrete, immediate threat” from Russia to the Baltic States, Poland, Bulgaria and Romania, at a press conference in Brussels on Thursday. Stoltenberg also said that despite Russia not posing a threat, NATO had decided to increase the size of its response force.
Source
On the topic of the thread itself, I find a determined reluctance on the part of some here to discuss the contents of the OP's link.
A perfect example of the Russian leadership and its disregard for human life. Also a perfect comparison to Nazi Germany and Hitler at the end, where the civilian deaths and military deaths no longer mattered to Hitler.
originally posted by: DrChinstrap
a reply to: stirling
It looks like speech is more free for some than for others.......
I agree with your viewpoint. So why the one sided anti Russian attitude?
originally posted by: masqua
On the topic of the thread itself, I find a determined reluctance on the part of some here to discuss the contents of the OP's link.
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: noeltrotsky
The total death toll is much higher as being told.
Ukrainians have been losing something like 4 to 1 at least, but a lot of fighting has actually been done by Eastern Ukrainians themselves.
It would all just be guessing with not actual numbers being told.
originally posted by: stirling
The treaty of Budapest guaranteed Ukraines sovereign integrity for giving up it nuclear arms....
We are signatory to that treaty I believe and are duty bound to help fight the Russian hordes sweeping in from the east......
Nato has spend billions prepping for just that scenario and is ready with the arms to deal with it,,,,turn them loose I say....a promise made is a debt unpaid....
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: masqua
Oh, no...
A spelling mistake causes friction within a thread!
It seems to me that in the context of the posts, it was quite obvious what the intent was... a remark on Putin's desire to 'save' expats from rampaging fascist Eastern & Western Europeans by using young conscripts to facilitate his personal war in the Ukraine.
What's next... Estonia, Lithuania, Alberta?