It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: Tangerine
We don't even have a proper definition of
the control system unfortunately. Wouldn't
that be a great first step --- before trying to
poke it with a stick?
Kev
Well, yeah...but we have to work within our limitations. I think Vallee wants to poke it with a stick to prove that it exists. If it moves or growls or bites that's evidence that it exists.
> Kandinsky
The reason I mention them is to add evidence to your underlying point that the brain can create experiences as real, or more real than the standard experience of reality.
It's not too far a step to allow for the possibility that an infection could cause the brain to invent sensory experience to off-set the occurrence of different forms of overload.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
Now, people dont even have to experience a UAP first hand, all you have to do is watch 20 hours of the disclosure project and a few Ancient Aliens episodes to have a religious epiphany.
originally posted by: Tangerine
Are you serious? Can you explain that without going off-topic?
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: Tangerine
We don't even have a proper definition of
the control system unfortunately. Wouldn't
that be a great first step --- before trying to
poke it with a stick?
Kev
Well, yeah...but we have to work within our limitations. I think Vallee wants to poke it with a stick to prove that it exists. If it moves or growls or bites that's evidence that it exists.
Well why don't you help us out! It's your post.
What is YOUR definition of the 'Control Loop' ? What is 'It' controlling?
Which elements of 'reality' or 'society' or 'perception' does it seem
to be involved with?
In what way does the 'control loop' relate to the non-ETH?
Does 'It' seem to be organic? Inorganic? Living? Some sort of
'alien-ish' intelligence? Some sort of computer intelligence?
Or a vastly non-human type of mind that might not classify
as intelligence at all?
Does 'It' get it's intelligence by feeding off humans? Or does
it have it's own?
Can you ascertain ANY sort of pattern? What does it want?
Maybe more importantly --- what does it NOT want?
For example 'IT' doesn't seem to want to be analyzed or
defined by the rational mind.. but again, maybe that's
just an anthropomorphization on our part..
Maybe 'IT' is 'all us, all the time' and there is no funky
'IT-ness' involved with 'IT' at all. How could we ascertain
that one way or another?
We need to keep asking questions and 'circling the blurry target'
until it becomes at least a LITTLE more clear.
Once we know what 'IT' is like, at least somewhat, then we might
try to interact with 'IT' on an experimental basis in order to gain
further understanding.
I have an entire mythos/cosmos worldview based on this.. but
you don't seem to yet.. so maybe you can notice something
new that I've overlooked --- a fresh set of eyes..
Kev
I had a stretch of time when I experienced a panoply of unbounded phenomena that ranged from spectacular flying objects and bouncing globes of light on the ground in the desert
originally posted by: Ashirah
a reply to: Tangerine
I had a stretch of time when I experienced a panoply of unbounded phenomena that ranged from spectacular flying objects and bouncing globes of light on the ground in the desert
The strange events that I experienced and briefly described to you also occurred in the desert. Not sure whether its worth noting that the specific location was right near the VATT on Mt. Graham.
originally posted by: Springer
a reply to: Ashirah
Definitely the desert is weird (that doesn't mean "we" aren't but...).
If you've ever spent more than one night out in it, and I don't mean a Las Vegas or Scottsdale hotel suite, I mean under the stars, no tent, no nothing, you'll know what I mean.
originally posted by: Ashirah
a reply to: Tangerine
That's why I wasn't sure it was even worth mentioning, this being a non-ET thread. The area in question is fairly remote with little light pollution at night (both of my personal incidents took place at night), the skies are incredibly clear; these are some reasons why the funders of the VATT chose this place in particular. I think it would make some sense to see something out of the ordinary like a UFO in such a location given those facts, if one assumes that the object were a physical flying object rather than non-physical in nature. That's all