It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russian - UK 'Airspace Games...'

page: 5
3
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 21 2015 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: ukmicky1980

The existence of a bunker is nothing but a local rumour which I cannot substantiate. As for sarin, I don't have web links...I have pictures.




posted on Feb, 21 2015 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: VigiliaProcuratio

Well, if you have photographic proof, I suggest you post them, in a separate thread so they will get the attention they deserve.



posted on Feb, 21 2015 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: ukmicky1980

back on topic, not sure if video is widely known or not? but I though it was pretty cool, its of an iL-80 taxi & take off.

Anyone have any idea what all the 'spines' are on the top of the plane, behind the large bump?


Link
edit on 2/21/2015 by ukmicky1980 because: (no reason given)

edit on 2/21/2015 by ukmicky1980 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 21 2015 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: ukmicky1980

That's very risky. But...one of these days I might just do that.



posted on Feb, 21 2015 @ 06:33 PM
link   
a reply to: ukmicky1980

Antennas. The hump is a SATCOM antenna the others are HF and UHF.

Now the REAL question....

Is it an Il-80, Il-86, or Il-87?


edit on 2/21/2015 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2015 @ 04:17 AM
link   
a reply to: ukmicky1980

As Zaphod has already pointed out these are the range of antennas. See following image and links for antenna fits over the years on the Maxdomes.

www.airliners.net...

Maxdome image link Airliners.net



posted on Feb, 22 2015 @ 04:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: ukmicky1980

Antennas. The hump is a SATCOM antenna the others are HF and UHF.

Now the REAL question....

Is it an Il-80, Il-86, or Il-87?





Same aircraft coming in to land.

Is there even a difference between the 80 and 87?

Edit: not that it matters because that's an 86 it would appear.

edit on 1441642 by sg1642 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2015 @ 07:38 AM
link   
a reply to: sg1642

The airframe is based off is the Il-86. Same aircraft but you can find it designated as all three depending on where you look for information.



posted on Feb, 22 2015 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: sg1642

AFter China flew into an Orion I doubt we would be so bold with such a valuable system.



posted on Feb, 22 2015 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

The missions have continued just as before. They don't use B-52s because it's too easy to mistake them for something else.
edit on 2/22/2015 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)

edit on 2/22/2015 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 22 2015 @ 08:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: sg1642

The airframe is based off is the Il-86. Same aircraft but you can find it designated as all three depending on where you look for information.
the tail number you mean? That matches an il-86 camber.



posted on Feb, 22 2015 @ 08:24 AM
link   
a reply to: sg1642

No, the Il-80/86/87 designation. It's been referred to as all three by various sources. It started life as an Il-86 when it was built. Them after delivery as a normal Il-86 it underwent modification to the Il-80.
edit on 2/22/2015 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
3
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join