It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tusks
Here is a link to a pdf citing 106 studies of effects of radio frequency on living tissue. 93 studies found effects, 13 did not.
www.bioinitiative.org...
Another issue is that there are statements that do not
accord with the standard view of science, and the Report does not provide a reasonable account
of why we should reject the standard view in favour of the views espoused in the Report.
originally posted by: Tusks
a reply to: Bedlam
That "Linky" is useless to determine whether any of those tests were of any value. My bet is they used the same 20-25 "participants" in each study.
I have no doubt that such a condition exists, but the exact definition and the tests that would need to be developed to find it--especially amongst the folks who are susceptible and don't know it--really haven't been developed yet.
originally posted by: Tusks
So, a 2007 report about a new group concerned with a newly recognized problem gets criticized by another group.
But---
8 years on, they're still here, and they've got even more ammo backing up their concerns.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: Tusks
So, a 2007 report about a new group concerned with a newly recognized problem gets criticized by another group.
But---
8 years on, they're still here, and they've got even more ammo backing up their concerns.
And they're still just as fringey and partisan.
originally posted by: Tusks
All truth goes through 3 stages....
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: Tusks
All truth goes through 3 stages....
Well, that presupposes that it IS truth to start with.
Not a lot of love for bioinitiative at all. There are so MANY valid critiques it's hard to see what to post, but this one's nicely written.