It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: wasaka
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
We are all part of God's creation but we all are not God's children.
This line of thought is cultish.
If God is our Father, then all men are brothers. Those who reject this
common sense truth have embraced a cultish theology.
The idea of God is an evolutionary idea. One which has had a cultural progression from polytheism to monolarity in various places throughout human history, from Kemet (Egypt) to Levant (Canaan). The religion of ancient Israel is a product of this same process. They borrowed not only their neighbor’s architecture but the name of their god as well, then the nature of this tribal deity changed over time.
The vast majority of Christians look to the Hebrew scripture as their authority and thus their single source of faith (or theology). Even those who uphold the authoritativeness of “Holy Writ” will admit polytheism in Israelite history had a long run until under Hezekiah and then later Josiah destroyed the temples, idols and altars of other gods. Josiah’s reign is one of monolarity pushing towards monotheism which doesn’t fully take root until after the Jewish exile.
The Biblical word for God is “EL” and that word is not Jewish in origin, but rather it traces back to older Levant (Canaanite) religion. The patriarch Abraham is known as the father of the world’s three great monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. For centuries his faithfulness to one god (at a time when people worshiped many deities) has been regarded as a monumental break with the society around him. However, an archaeological discovery known as the Ugaritic texts is opening a window onto a different cultural context for Abraham’s story and it is turning most assumptions about “god” on their head.
Here is question for you: Was Melchizedek a son of God? According to the Letter to the Hebrews, Jesus Christ is identified as a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek, and so Jesus assumes the role of High Priest once and for all. Again, was this Priest of El what you would call a "son of God" by your theology?
If God is our Father, then all men are brothers. Those who reject this
common sense truth have embraced a cultish theology.
originally posted by: wasaka
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
We are all part of God's creation but we all are not God's children.
The idea of God is an evolutionary idea. One which has had a cultural progression from polytheism to monolarity in various places throughout human history, from Kemet (Egypt) to Levant (Canaan). The religion of ancient Israel is a product of this same process. They borrowed not only their neighbor’s architecture but the name of their god as well, then the nature of this tribal deity changed over time.
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
If God is our Father, then all men are brothers. Those who reject this
common sense truth have embraced a cultish theology.
That is your first mistake - God is not everyone's father and not every child is a child of God. I have proven this point in my thread. Many refuse to accept God for who he is so you speak in general terms....... way to vague for me.
I have shown proof that not everyone is a child of God.
Three faiths around the world accept the Torah as a main part of their teaching. Are you telling me that 2 to 3 billion people are wrong and you are right?
originally posted by: Cogidubnus
a reply to: DeathSlayer
Now that is an interesting statement. What if you are? What if you have spent your entire life worshiping only false idols? I don't know you, I am not saying you have been. Merely a hypothetical, "what if?" I do believe in your book of worship it states, "For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect. 25"Behold, I have told you in advance".
What if you and every other religious devout individual has been bamboozled from the start! What if you inadvertently worship the ultimate mack daddy of all false idols every day of your life and you never had a clue? Scary stuff. You better hope God's got a plan for that one...
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DeathSlayer
You answered more than I asked. I didn't ask the procedure on HOW to prove the bible wrong, I asked if you think that the act of trying to prove it wrong is being deceitful.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
Well then, if Jesus doesn't want me for a sunbeam, I'll just be a sunbeam for those who DO want me! His loss.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DeathSlayer
So are people who make valid criticisms of the bible not children of god either? Or do you not consider any criticism of the bible valid?
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
Or you could question anything said in the old and new testaments as the words of men that very conveniently decided on calling their followers ''favoured by God'', ''special'' etc, hence making them their followers and subject to their rules. How clever and how gullible.
How can you prove these men were not being guided by God to write down what they see and hear? Is this not possible?
originally posted by: LittleByLittle
From my point of view:
Works is the answer. All chosen/blessed ones in every religion have been from the same source no matter the name. There are souls on this planet that follow Jesus teaching perfectly without knowing it and without caring about how they label themselves.
The Sikh, Hindu, Bahá'í, Buddhist have the same source(God) but different ways to teach the union with source than Jesus. The same holy spirit is found behind all religions. Light/chi/kundalini is the same things. The energetic love vibration from the higher levels.
For the source there is no true religions giving the all spanning truth that defines everything. They are all more or less idols of the all spanning truth.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
Or you could question anything said in the old and new testaments as the words of men that very conveniently decided on calling their followers ''favoured by God'', ''special'' etc, hence making them their followers and subject to their rules. How clever and how gullible.
How can you prove these men were not being guided by God to write down what they see and hear? Is this not possible?
god, by principle, is not tested because that undermines the margin of plausible deniability that currently stands as gods sole defense against modern science. furthermore, exceptions and excuses are endlessly provided as to why god should not be tested, ergo the confusion when it is consistently presented as a fact in spite of its adamantly untestable nature. since it cant be tested, it cant be proven impossible...or possible. which means it is inadmissible in most courts of scientific inquiry. hence why you are HERE arguing about it, and not writing eloquent dissertations to the board of scientific american.
According to the laws of science you are correct........ 100% BUT I see an error with science........ science can not analyze or test "spirit".