It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
I would think it would work, IF the following:
1) If the individual can not work due to medical reasons, they are not penalized.
2) They should not be required to work a full 40 hour week, unless the amount of "pay" equates to minimum wage.
3) The program helps those involved in trying to find an actual full time employment.
The program helps those involved in trying to find an actual full time employment.
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: jude11
Slavery is working forced against only enough money to pay rent and eat.
It depends on how much money you earn if it`s fair or not.
With automation more and more jobs disappear, and the rest can be filled in with slavery is the ultimate wet dream of our masters.
It`s simply a trick to work around "not paying enough" by letting the slaves work a few hours less a week...it`s something which waits us all in the future.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: jude11
What happens to the people drafted into these schemes that does not turn up for the state sponsored chain gang one morning, because that extra £10 they add on to there JSA had to go on electricity or gas? Or towards a new pair of cheap Primark shoes for one of the poor souls School wanes, instead of towards there weekly travel card which i should also add £10 will not cover. Do "they" then sanction 70% of there state benefit due to absenteeism/non participation? YES is the answer im afraid.
How can they take away 70% of what "They" deem is only sufficient to live from in the first place would probably be a more pertinent question?