Obama Refused to Give Jordan, Egypt Information on ISIS Targets

The truth is America doesn’t need or even want Egypt and Jordan to bomb ISIL

They want their asses in boots on the ground…
And strategically their right.

They need at least two divisions of troops on the ground along with US air strikes


Can’ these ass holes figure that out?

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

Jordan and Egypt should wage all out war against ISIS and tell anyone who says anything about it, to shove it.

I agree, but they and we don't need to be up in arms when they ask us to share our intel.
It would be a curtsey if we did, we do not have to and usually don't.
Our alphabet boys barely share intel with each other and we are up in arms about them not sharing with a whole other country?

Yet they seem to have plenty of targets for the other Arab countries in the fight lol. The UAE, The country WE are training the other Syrian terrorist group in. If we can sneak into Syria, get out members of the FSA, fly them to the UAE train them and sneak them back into Syria I can guarantee they know where to hit ISIS lol.

They knew where to hit the smaller terrorist network the first day they were supposed to be bombing ISIS. Never mind the horrible job they did keeping ISIS out of that poor border town when they were out in open fields for god sakes. Only Obama can screw up that bad. Any real commander in chief would have carpet bombed the whole outskirts of the city and saved it from being over ran, never mind the puss ass Turks should have like they swore to do yet did not lift a finger to help them.

originally posted by: Willtell
The truth is America doesn’t need or even want Egypt and Jordan to bomb ISIL

They want their asses in boots on the ground…
And strategically their right.

They need at least two divisions of troops on the ground along with US air strikes


Can’ these ass holes figure that out?

I absolutely disagree, that would be the absolute worst move in this horrendous game of chess.

a reply to: Jonjonj

What would be worst putting divisions of Arab armies on the ground?

a reply to: Willtell
I don't understand the question.
Oh OK, I misunderstood. You mean ME troups on the ground? In that case I agree. My apologies.

originally posted by: Willtell
The truth is America doesn’t need or even want Egypt and Jordan to bomb ISIL

They want their asses in boots on the ground…
And strategically their right.

They need at least two divisions of troops on the ground along with US air strikes


Can’ these ass holes figure that out?

Oh I agree. That is why I said they should wage all out war against ISIS. Then again Russia may be threatening us behind closed doors to keep them out of Syria. On the ground that is.

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Willtell

Can’ these ass holes figure that out?

I absolutely disagree, that would be the absolute worst move in this horrendous game of chess.

Why would that be? The friendly Arabs nations need to grow a set and learn how to fight when it is a just cause and not their own dam people.

originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Willtell

Can’ these ass holes figure that out?

I absolutely disagree, that would be the absolute worst move in this horrendous game of chess.

Why would that be? The friendly Arabs nations need to grow a set and learn how to fight when it is a just cause and not their own dam people.

See my previous post. Just to be clear, in my opinion, only the ME's will to destroy this bacteria will work, with our help if necessary, if we wish to see any possible long term solution.

Like Ollie North would ever be in the loop on what strategy or intelligence information is being shared between the US and other Arab nations. Just another example of Fox "make BS up 'cause no one can ever prove otherwise" quasi-reporting from it's slate of former neocons.

The Fox report could be controlled opposition.

People won't believe it and will automatically assume it's not true without anybody proving anything.

a reply to: xuenchen

Including you since you think all MSM is all bs anyway

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: xuenchen

Including you since you think all MSM is all bs anyway

But I think it might *Be* true.



Obama only wants specific pinpoint bombings.



He has his reasons.

originally posted by: Patriotsrevenge
Oh yes they can, Headlines anyway. Not the small print im sure. It has been said from a ton of people who work in the field and different mil sources. They can also read license plates at the right angle.

Yeah, I've heard all that too, and it's all talk.

You can only get so much data through a lens. There's a hard limit on the amount of resolution you can get for a given aperture and imaging color. It's easier to see finer detail in blue light, for example, because the wavelength's smaller.

But since any real lens has an edge and isn't infinite, none of them are "perfect", even if in every other way they are. This boundary sets the limit on resolution due to diffraction effects. No amount of processing or better grinding techniques will help.

Not to say you can't see smaller features, but not using optical imaging. If you can imagine an image where the only thing you can see are the surface contours of objects, then yeah, there are ways to image down to a few cm, but you can't see markings or what-have-you. So I might be able to ID a person by facial shape and body contour, but I can't "see" your face, nor read markings on a paper, although it might be obvious you're holding a paper by the way your hands are positioned. Depending on the imaging technique I might be able to see the outline of the newspaper.

Im not an Obama lover but the pubs were so dreadful, except Dr. Paul, as an independent I almost am glad he got re elected . Isis has not done anything stupid here in the U.S. yet. The white houses defense is that Obama is using an almost stay out of it type of language and not pointing out Islam. Maybe we should stay out of it and let those countries deal with it. Any American who goes over there stopped getting my sympathy after the first couple of contractor beheadings. Sure I feel bad for those tortured no matter where they are from. The immigration thing and all kinds of do nothing against travesties in this country are my problems with him. Yes it seems he is a muslim, his changed name is muslim, but when he was elected there was that crazy preacher whos church Obama went to and it was a hardcore racist hate church which Obama had to separate himself from quick like. Just saying, he was going to a Christian church when elected, to be honest, that fool probably doesn't know what the hell he is. A Marxist socialist I do believe he is , that's a difficult task to achieve though.

a reply to: UnBreakable

Oliver North is a paid FOX Commentator and has not been in the Military for nearly 30 years after being forced to resign due to the Iran-Contra scandal (Selling weapons to Iran)

Can you provide a source for his claims?

I am fairly certain that sharing military intelligence without congressional approval is an impeachable offense.

Has congress approved?

NON-STORY!

a reply to: UnBreakable

Regarding Jordan - the US may not have given information on Isis targets, but we are supporting their strikes with F-22s and F-16s flying escorts. So, Oli can go ahead and bash Obama and attempt to further divide the US, but the reality is, the US is fully supporting the Jordanian strikes.

Source: AirForceTimes

originally posted by: LeatherNLace
I am fairly certain that sharing military intelligence without congressional approval is an impeachable offense.

Has congress approved?

NON-STORY!

Lol

Congressional approval lol stop your making me laugh too hard.

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: LeatherNLace
I am fairly certain that sharing military intelligence without congressional approval is an impeachable offense.

Has congress approved?

NON-STORY!

Lol

Congressional approval lol stop your making me laugh too hard.

Is what I said fact or fiction? Throw out an insult, but please back it up with FACTS. Am I wrong?

originally posted by: LeatherNLace

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: LeatherNLace
I am fairly certain that sharing military intelligence without congressional approval is an impeachable offense.

Has congress approved?

NON-STORY!

Lol

Congressional approval lol stop your making me laugh too hard.

Is what I said fact or fiction? Throw out an insult, but please back it up with FACTS. Am I wrong?

No you are not wrong, I'm laughing because you think that will stop him from bypassing congress he has already said he would if he has to besides what's he got to lose? He's not campaigning anymore.