It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: the2ofusr1
Not the first time it happened. Several planes that crashed at high speed/high angles into soft ground sank several feet underground, and were found anywhere from 3-5 feet or more underground.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Flatcoat
And how exactly do you and they know that column 79 was the problem? Do you have any evidence? Or just a very implausible theory with no supporting evidence whatsoever
I accept the experts evidence.
Not huxter for profit websites.
As to these super secret agents keeping a lid on 911:
You must mean like the Secret Service and the hooker in some third world country.
originally posted by: charlyv
The wing marks do show pretty well in high contrast.
What Zaph said about them being of low mass, and exploding violently on impact kind of makes sense, seeing the shallow craters that they leave.
originally posted by: oxidadoblanco
You CANNOT melt all the "structural steel" inside of a concrete column from jet fuel...
and "melt" all the structural steel in the building.....
Something is wrong with this entire scenario.