It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rotherham whistleblower, threatened by cops & given "race awareness training"

page: 5
16
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 11:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: berenike

I agree with that berenike...

It also is good to expose the ethnicity so victims who haven't come forward don't feel as if it's just gonna be kept quiet because of the attackers race.

[quote.
/While at the same time I do wonder what's so important about ethnicity.[quote

Your post from page one. So which is it? Make your mind up.
edit on 14-2-2015 by Fermy because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 11:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Fermy


Where have I lied?


"Not 'white' British."

Lie.

"The media is adopting a soft approach lest they too be charged with racism. "

Lie. The report was concealed by the Rotherham Council not the media.

"Show me names of the non Pak Muslim offenders. You cannot, ergo you are suggesting spurious information."

Lie, Lee Crutchley non-Pakistani non-Muslim offender.

"Your report mentions recent cases, hence the white bouncer mugshot."

Lie, he had been doing this for 2 decades.




You're sure the media isn't playing the ethnicity angle down in the name of multi multi PC?


Yep I'm certain because it's the media reporting the cover up that was initiated by the Rotherham Council, otherwise we'd be none the wiser.



Tell you what, let's bung in the great train robbery ad well they were white Brits, completely irrelevant if course but we can't have all the blame on this misogynist mindset after all.


Strawman.
Many ethnicities are involved in the Rotherham Report... Which is why I "wondered" why only the Asians are important to some...

I haven't excused it and said a few times they should be hung.




It may upset you that white brits were involved, but they don't represent you...

You shouldn't have denied they were also involved in some small manner just because you'd rather it only was about Asians.




& all this because you didn't like the fact the Asian community have come out and said the cover up over race was disgusting...


What would you have to say if the Asian community had come out and said the cover up was the right thing to do...
Or if they had said nothing at all...

I'd "wonder" but I'm sure you'd have many more diagnoses to hand out for such a transgression.
edit on 14-2-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Fermy

It's both.

None of you who are hung up on the ethnicity have said "it may help to encourage other victims to come forward"...

I have... I don't think ethnicity is important in solving the whole problem which had a diverse background of groomers...

Comprende!

Your reasoning for being hung up on ethnicity is left to the imagination, because you haven't explained it...

You'd rather dish out insults and mental health diagnostics.
edit on 14-2-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 11:50 AM
link   
BS and you know it.

First you say ethnicity isn't important,5 pages later you agree it is.

The rest of your nonsense doesn't merit a reply. Dream on dreamer. YOU are the only straw man here, you are the weakest link seeking to divert and hide, that much is plain to see.
Pakistan's misogynistic culture in the UK has ruined 1,400 lives and disgraceful apologists as embodied by yourself seek to play it down.
Such hubris.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: dam00

You mean does what I believe come before where my ancestors are from?


Yes.


Which is why there no such thing as a British Muslim, thanks for the clarification.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Fermy

I said "I wonder why" it is so important to some who only love to go with the false "all Asian" narrative that another poster falsely implied but hasn't returned since I proved differently...


Those are the people "I wonder" about because it makes me "wonder" what purpose there is in denying others involvement while saying it is "100% Asian/Muslim"...

Do you not find that suspicious that people would make those claims?



BS and you know it.


No, & hopefully you now understand.

Poe's Law had caused this, not my "wonder"!!!




Got anything to say about all the non-Asian & non-Muslim groomers you were denying existed in the Rotherham Scandal?

Thought not.


Got anything to prove the Report is a falsified cover up of complete Asian/Muslim involvement and nobody else?

Thought not.



The rest of your nonsense doesn't merit a reply.


Is it even possible to reply to without conceding that you were completely wrong regarding the above?

Not really!


& I don't trust that you're honest enough to do so.


You'll continue the narrative you espouse here and in real life...
You'll use the same arguments that have been proven invalid...

Prove me wrong, like I proved you wrong, admit you were mislead/lying/never knew about non-Asians involved...

Or carry on with the nonsense.
edit on 14-2-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-2-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: Mistake!



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 12:06 PM
link   
a reply to: dam00

No problem.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: dam00

A star from me for your post.


Your previous threads show us your agenda.


Agenda ! Call it what you like, there are never any lies in my posts.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 01:51 PM
link   
en.m.wikipedia.org...

If anyone wants the real facts instead of Charlie's apologist BS then they can read all of this link.
I would also recommend they look up the Oxford child rape gang and the Rochdale child rape gang. Though to be fair to the resident clown, 1 of the Rochdale scummers was not Pakistani, he was Afghani. Also two of the Oxford gang were not Pakistani either, they were Eritrean.
On the other hand the 7 members of the Telford paedo rapists were only described as South Asian, they were however, all Muslims as were the Oxford and Rochdale rapist paedos.
So there you have, proven " beyond reasonable doubt". As they say.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: dam00

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: dam00

A star from me for your post.


Your previous threads show us your agenda.


there are never any lies in my posts.


That was hilarious!



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: Fermy





Got anything to say about all the non-Asian & non-Muslim groomers you were denying existed in the Rotherham Scandal?



I doubt he'd care, unless the rapist has a Muslim name of course. Take a look at Westminster, it's infested with them, yet no outrage.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Boeing777

originally posted by: dam00

originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: dam00

A star from me for your post.


Your previous threads show us your agenda.


there are never any lies in my posts.


That was hilarious!


Really in what way



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Boeing777

Then you'd be wrong. But this isn't a thread about the Westminster paedos, unless you're prepared to get one going with some names and prosecutions? No, thought not.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Fermy

LoL...

I'm sure a Wikipedia page is much more reliable than the actual Rotherham Report.



www.rotherham.gov.uk...


You know the one above;
that's the actual Report,
from the actual people,
who compiled the actual data...



If anyone is a clown here it's you!

edit on 14-2-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 03:53 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

You would deny the names in Wikipedia? Surely any human rights and libel lawyer would have a field day with the reported names? Of course, nothing happened because the names are correct,feel free to prove otherwise because the law hasn't intervened. Only you doubt the veracity, as I said before ,such hubris.
As for the Rotherham report,would that be the same government office that resigned en masse in disgrace? Credible then.
Nice try Coco



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 04:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Fermy

Didn't deny a thing.

Your proclamation of "real facts" is a sly dig at me implying that all the links I've shared are false...


Which is not true.

Read the report...


In fact, read about the resignations...

They were resigning because of the implications of the report.


Rotherham Council members covered up what was found in the report & resigned when it came to light...

They didn't resign because people didn't buy into the report.




So don't twist this.

Read the report... It's outlines the basics of the why there was a scandal in the first place.


Nice try?

Sure.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 04:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs

m.thestar.co.uk...





LOL!! *The Star* now I know you're really scraping the bottom

of the barrel



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Bull shifter. I've given you the names. All Muslims, mostly Pak's, an Afghan and a pair of Eritrea's.



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 04:30 PM
link   
a reply to: eletheia

Maybe you should google Lee Crutchley Rotherham you'll find many more sources other than the Star!



posted on Feb, 14 2015 @ 04:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Fermy

Yep you did.

Didn't deny it.

Said from page one they were majority Asian.



I also gave you the name of a White Brit who was also arrested, charged & sentenced in Rotherham.
After 2 decades in the Shadows.
The same two decades the whole scandal is talking about.

You denying that?

Or you accepting it?




Your denial doesn't bother me...

Just don't call me ignorant if I dodge your posts from now on in any thread.

No point talking to a brick wall.




top topics



 
16
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join