It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well, his "evidence" has not been disputed but his interpretation certainly has. So, while it can't definitively be stated that there was never a nuclear blast on Mars, his "evidence" does not definitively say there was. He's saying, in so many words, "unless someone can prove me wrong, I'm right." That's sort of a no-no in science.
and that his basic evidence for artificial nuclear reactions on Mars hasn't been disputed.
The xenon found in some stony meteorites shows a large proportion of xenon-129, believed to be a product of radioactive decay of iodine-129, whose half-life is 17,000,000 years.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: olaru12
Mars is 4.5 Billion years old. Not hard to imagine that an entire civilization could have formed/thrived/self-destructed (or been destroy by aliens) in some window of time there.
Maybe some escaped and came to Earth...or were here before the cataclysm. We could all be descendants of Immigrants from Mars.
originally posted by: 11SK1180
Mars could be a sign to show us what will happen if We continue on our path. Close enough to see our fate.
originally posted by: St Udio
there might be a linkage between Ancient Mars advanced technology Civilization (and long ago nuclear remnants/artifacts)
just as there are evidence of Nuclear detonations in the Hindu/Indian landscape and there are the flying machines in Indian Myth Tales and Vedas that predate the last Ice Age...
originally posted by: St Udioperhaps the remnants of the water-Planet "Vulcan" (now the asteroid belt) left Mars a completely empty world with
the thin atmosphere stripped away... the magnetosphere then collapsed and the shielding from high energy rays doomed any survivor species to a very high risk Doom, inevitable depopulation...