a reply to: limaflyer
Hello Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez, I see you just subscribed to ATS to talk about this case.
In your message you just repeated the same thing you said before in your Youtube
channel but not more information not even an update of your original testimonial.
So let's analyze again the case based in the new updated informations .
Aurelio Rodriguez Rodriguez from Lima Peru is an expert designer of remote control
airplanes wich he builds and works in Centro internacional de la Papa CIP in Lima and
PUCP Peru. He has a collection of remote controled airplanes and some kites and
balloons. Then we can say he knows what he sees, however Mr. Rodriguez has failed
to demonstrate his theory of the kite based in a single photograph that doesn't provide
enough informstion to calculate the actual size of the mentioned kite therefore here
are the conclusions to date about Mr. Rodriguez with a serial of questions unaswered
by him that need to be explained here in ATS to consider his position.
In Lima Peru the actual status of this case is still unexplained by general consensus
the researchers,media and people. The only explanation proposed that made some
noise creating doubts initially was the single photo taken by Aurelio Rodriguez of a
kite that showed similar colors of the object in the footage but this proposal by
Mr. Rodriguez has been discared because OF THE ACTUAL SIZE of this kite that has
been in discussion many times since the photo appeared and the general conclusion
is that a small kite like this one could not have been seen at that distance of 5 kms.
where the tv crew recorded the sighting and this is a very good point in this debate.
The issue could have been cleared very easy by Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez by going again
to the location of the photo and find the mentioned kite wich makes sense would
be still there for sale or rent or even some similar kites, this in order to see the
actual size and have the extremely required information to make a comparison
according to the distance.
Being Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez and expert in remote controlled airplanes and also
kites he has not and I repeat has not provided the informartion of the size of
this kite he photographed allegedly the same day at that location, I say
allegedly because is just a single photo and there is no way to confirm this
photo was taken the same day at the location in Costa Verde, it's only the
word by Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez but not a confirmed fact UNLESS he finds in
the same location the kite or a similar kite and we all can see the actual size.
At this point the key element in this debate is of course the actual size of the
kite Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez claims he photographed the same day in Costa Verde
and this key element has not been provided with evidence by Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez
and that is why the people in Lima Peru has not accepted the kite claim.
There are some experts in kites in Peru including air traffic controllers and people
who build and sale a variety of kites and all of them rejected the proposal from
Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez of a kite he photographed because the kite looks so small
according to the reference of the lamp in the photograph wich reveals aproximately
the small size but still not confirmed by Mr. Rodruigez. Therefore all the opinions
discard the hypotesis of the kite to explain the sighting in Miraflores because of this
key element, a kite of that small size is just impossible to be seen at that distance.
Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez: According to your expertise in kites what was the estimated
size of this kite you photographed?
Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez: Why have you not tried to find this kite in Costa Verde where
they sale this or simlar kites or just fly this kinds of kites to find out the size of the
diferent kites available there in Costa Verde?
Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez being yourself an expert in RC airplanes and kites why have you
not made a recreation with a similar kite at the same location in Miraflores? Being this
a huge case story in Lima Peru I'm sure that to make a recreation to support you theory
would be so easy and also important to clearify any doubts still in this case, would you
care to help in this investigation finding a kite and making a recreation to prove this
was as you claim just a kite instead a single photo and a very short unproven statement?
When this case story went public I was interested in the investigation and believed this
was indeed a ufo sighting according to all the people involved, the evidences testimonials
from may witnesses. Then a photo appeared showing a kite allegedly the same day and
location and the only element this photo provided was the similar colors nothing more,
no idea of the actual size, no video to see the movements, nothing more. The photo
made me doubt and I also believed this could be the explanation. But later when I
followed the updates on the case and read all the reactions from the people in Peru
I realized that mine was a premature conclusion because the arguments from experts
and researchers in Peru signaled to the size of the kite, an extremely heavy argument
against the kite proposal and more opinions came to support this response, it's impossible
for a kite to be seen at that distance simply because of the size, there is not a kite big
enough in Miraflores to match the sighting.
How to destroy this Kite Size argument ? Simply showing the giant kite and making a good
recreation or simply fly the giant kite to check the behavior and movement in the sky and
must of all, to check how stabilized it appears or if the kite can be static in the sky according
to the footage.
You see Mr. Rodriguez how difficult, how coplicated is to prove without a doubt your claim
this was a kite without hard evidence, in this case showing the kite and making a recreation.
You may say now Mr. Aurelio Rodriguez that you are not interested and don't have time to go
again to Costa Verde to try to find this kites or a similar one to show it to us. I don't care if
you refuse to colaborate in this investigation, it's your priviledge. All the people in Peru had
refused your kite hypotesis because of what I mentioned, there are only some members here
in ATS that believe you only by seeing a single photo even that the size is not provided and
believe in your statement, I'm not included. But this is not an act of faith to believe an individual
who claims something based in a single photo and short statement but no evidence to support
this claim because I repeat again THE SIZE OF THE KITE is the key element, Mr. Rodriguez has
not provided this element.
The possible hoax by Aurelio Rodriguez from Peru. There is a new development in this debate
about the failed kite explanation by Aurelio Rodruigez, arguments that are becoming strong
in Peru. The sighting took place in Miraflores on February 10, 2015 and became a huge news
the next day, it went viral also on the Internet. Aurelio Rodriguez uploaded his photopraph
of the alleged kite till February 17, 2015. By this date the case was an authentic bomb seen
and talked everywhere, being Aurelio Rodriguez an expert builder of kites and RC planes he
would easily have made a small kite with the same colors and take a single photograph, not
two or more just a single photograph with no references but a street lamp and then claim this
was the UFO seen by many in Miraflores. Could this be true? Mr. Rodriguez can deny this by
SHOWING THE "GIANT KITE".