It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest
A star for your thoughts, however, Zachariah 6 makes it clear that Joseph, the son of Jozadak, is THE BRANCH. Besides, we already know that John the Baptist was Elijah.
“‘Listen, High Priest Joshua, you and your associates seated before you, who are men symbolic of things to come: I am going to bring my servant, the Branch
‘Here is the man whose name is the Branch,
There is a typology between the two characters, but no indication of reincarnation. I dont see where you are drawing these ideas.
The angel of the Lord gave this charge to Joshua: 7 “This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘If you will walk in obedience to me and keep my requirements, then you will govern my house and have charge of my courts, and I will give you a place among these standing here.
Listen, High Priest Joshua, you and your associates seated before you, who are men symbolic of things to come: I am going to bring my servant, the Branch. 9 See, the stone I have set in front of Joshua! There are seven eyes on that one stone, and I will engrave an inscription on it,’ says the Lord Almighty, ‘and I will remove the sin of this land in a single day.
Take the silver and gold and make a crown, and set it on the head of the high priest, Joshua son of Jozadak. 12 Tell him this is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘Here is the man whose name is the Branch, and he will branch out from his place and build the temple of the Lord. 13 It is he who will build the temple of the Lord, and he will be clothed with majesty and will sit and rule on his throne. And he will be a priest on his throne. Zechariah 6:12
.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: Akragon
If only progression and regression, what do you think the next incarnation was, or would be ??
Do you think he did well last time and deserves to move forwards ??
Or take a step back because of ultimate failure ??
originally posted by: windword
There is strong evidence that the biblical character of Jesus the Son of Joseph, also know as Jesus the Nazarene and who notoriously was bestowed with the title of "Christ" after his death and upon rumors of his resurrection, was a prophesied reincarnated soul, promised a "Messiahship" or "Christhood" in the Old Testament.
...
Those rules actually say this, In simple terms.
NO progression OR regression exists here, No matter what, you will be recycled endlessly, never achieving anything at all !
I must have missed the evidence. Evidence has to be testable and have been tested to prove fact. You're simply citing claims.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Tangerine
I must have missed the evidence. Evidence has to be testable and have been tested to prove fact. You're simply citing claims.
My claims are not rooted in reality but in biblical scripture. Think of it as analyzing the plot and progress of Star Wars and its character Luke Skywalker, or Star Trek's Spock!
---------------
reponse follow:
I do understand that but it might be best to use a word other than "evidence". Perhaps "supported by" would be a better word choice. This topic is going to attract a number of fundamentalists who are handicapped by being unable to understand context and certainly don't understand the meaning of the word evidence. Good topic, though.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Tangerine
I must have missed the evidence. Evidence has to be testable and have been tested to prove fact. You're simply citing claims.
My claims are not rooted in reality but in biblical scripture. Think of it as analyzing the plot and progress of Star Wars and its character Luke Skywalker, or Star Trek's Spock!
originally posted by: BlueMule
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Tangerine
I must have missed the evidence. Evidence has to be testable and have been tested to prove fact. You're simply citing claims.
My claims are not rooted in reality but in biblical scripture. Think of it as analyzing the plot and progress of Star Wars and its character Luke Skywalker, or Star Trek's Spock!
Plus, I have evidence that the Borg are not confined to the Star Trek universe. They are in the Star Wars universe too. In fact they were there first!
👣
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
originally posted by: BlueMule
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Tangerine
I must have missed the evidence. Evidence has to be testable and have been tested to prove fact. You're simply citing claims.
My claims are not rooted in reality but in biblical scripture. Think of it as analyzing the plot and progress of Star Wars and its character Luke Skywalker, or Star Trek's Spock!
Plus, I have evidence that the Borg are not confined to the Star Trek universe. They are in the Star Wars universe too. In fact they were there first!
👣
I demand you prove such outlandish claims!
It says Jesus was made identical "in every respect" to us. If this is the case then wouldn't that mean we also have the ability to not sin just like Jesus? John seems to think so in his letters.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Akragon
Thank you for answering the question, I dont have a rebuttal as Ive never come across the claim before. Im sure I'll form my own opinion as I investigate , but I wont burden you with it.
originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: windword
Interesting...
Christians don't believe in reincarnation though.... so obviously their god doesn't either
Thus... Jesus can't be reincarnated because Christians don't believe in such things... meaning they can't exist