It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Because an aggressive, expansionist Russia is a threat not only to Ukraine, but all of Europe.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: crazyewok
Just to be clear, it was Russia that first "Poked it's nose in Ukraine's business" by annexing Crimea and supplying troops and arms to East Ukraine.
Yeah they did.
Doesn't mean the USA should then poke there grubby noses in too.
In the last 60 years when has US interference ever resulted in any good?
If you read my above post Putin will not move beyond Ukraine.
He could NEVER win a offensive war in NATO held Europe.
Russia= Poorly equipped badly trained.
UK/France/Germany= modern 21st century highly trained
USA= modern 21st century highly trained and #ing vast in size.
Putin knows this and he may be many thing, monster, evil ect one thing he is not is dumb.
Rather than poking in to a civil war and likely making things worse (I mean come on your not dumb, what good could selling arms in Ukraine actually do?) we should just be focusing on making NATO stronger and making sure a Russia are contained in Ukraine.
originally posted by: AreUKiddingMe
a reply to: rickymouse
You've got it backwards. Russia is the one provoking. What the hell were they thinking anyway, going into Ukraine?
originally posted by: crazyewok
Honestly why is the US pocking its grubby noses in Ukraine?
Why cant the US just piss of and leave Ukraine to war on its own. The last thing a civil war needs anyway is MORE GUNS!.
Why does the US always feel the need to make things worse?
Anyway there are bigger threats the west is facing at the moments threats unlike Ukraine that are are actually threatening direct national security. Ie ISIS. concentrate on them FFS.
I say we let any Western contractors go over and take it to those mafia thugs and teach them what war is really like.
We probably won't know anything about what happened in the Minsk meeting until all the backroom deals are done and they announce either arming Ukraine or sending in UN troops.
originally posted by: Wookiep
Does anyone have any word on the meeting that was supposed to take place today in Minsk? I haven't seen a peep about it anywhere... From my understanding, it greatly depends on that meeting as to whether the decision to send arms to Ukraine will happen, or not..
Thanks for the update, I honestly didn't know if it was still ongoing.
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: Wookiep
It`s still going on, and might still take a long time.
originally posted by: TonyS
The calculus on this is really very simple. What the Ukranians want is something called "Artillery Locating Radar" to be able to target and destroy the opposition artilery which is chewing them up.
The U.S. would have way too many fighters and bombers over his troops in a short period of time no matter how many air bases he could render inoperable in Europe. Risking Losing a large part of his own territory is not worth it to him, YET.
When the Soviets had 10,000 tanks to throw into Germany it was a given that tactical nukes would be fired at the invading forces should they try to cross the Rhine after pushing NATO forces back that far. That quickly led to all out nuclear war.