It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: AboveBoard
That is a major problem I hear about with welfare. I hear that if someone gets a starting wage, which only makes sense, they suddenly lose their benefits and are unable to pay rent and support themselves and their family.
Since it is only reasonable that one would start with a low wage job and work their way up, it seems like there is a dangerous fiscal cliff that would be hard to overcome.
I think there should be graduated benefits based on one's income like what disability does, so that someone could earn a bit of money and lose a bit of welfare (less than the amount earned). This way they can slowly work their way to getting off, all the while reaping the benefits of work.
originally posted by: Daughter2
The welfare and disability systems were set-up under the assumption that once you start working you could fully house, feed and provide medical care for your family and usually have a little left over. This was true from about 1940 to 1980.
Of course it's not true now. Not providing a living wage causes all sorts of issues and dealing with people on disability is just one of them.
originally posted by: Daughter2
The welfare and disability systems were set-up under the assumption that once you start working you could fully house, feed and provide medical care for your family and usually have a little left over. This was true from about 1940 to 1980.
Of course it's not true now. Not providing a living wage causes all sorts of issues and dealing with people on disability is just one of them.
originally posted by: Daughter2
The welfare and disability systems were set-up under the assumption that once you start working you could fully house, feed and provide medical care for your family and usually have a little left over. This was true from about 1940 to 1980.
Of course it's not true now. Not providing a living wage causes all sorts of issues and dealing with people on disability is just one of them.
originally posted by: Edumakated
Columnist Jason Riley has an excellent article in the Wall Street Journal this morning about how welfare destroyed the black family. It is the 50th anniversary of liberal Democrat Senator Daniel Moynihan's paper where he warned that the liberal welfare polices developed in the 60s would destroy the black family and have grave consequences. He was roundly criticized at the time, however, we now have 50 years of data showing he was absolutely correct.
The crux of the issue is that welfare creates disincentives by penalizing someone for working and in the case of the black family, it pushed black fathers out of the home (you can't receive benefits if you are married). The out of wedlock birth rate for blacks was only about 20% in the 60s, but now is above 70%. Welfare created the "baby mama" culture that is devastating the black community.