It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
a reply to: TheLieWeLive
The evidence is most likely Imaging showing that the 911 planes were swapped in mid-air with other planes that were most likely remote controlled
or images showing where the 911 planes truly originated.
originally posted by: carpooler
a reply to: jaffo
jaffo, dude you are in the dark. There were U.S. cruisers directly under one of the Japanese air groups in the slot. They used radio telephones to warn Pearl 55 minutes before the bombs started falling. By the time they came back into port, that night, they wanted to shoot the bone heads in the combat center. Fortunately they were hustled back out to the far reaches of the Pacific. Someone, had to have spiked the coffee pots in the control areas, and everyone was out of it. Not drunk, just out of it. The whole charade was organized by the Soviets to take away the Japanese Army on their own Eastern Front. This freed up Soviet Army moved West across Russia and arrived at Moscow, at the same time the Wehrmacht did. This stopped the Germans, in the nick of time, at the Gates of Moscow.
From the Soviet standpoint, Japan attacking us in Hawaii was a must do project. Otherwise the Axis Powers would have knocked Russia out of WWII, by very early in 1942. Gen. MacArthur was told to stay in his hotel room in the Philippines or else he would be murdered, on that same morning. Dec. 8th, on the other side of the International Dateline. So Clarke Field was left open to attack as well. Our Federal Gov't was full of commies on Dec. 7th 1941, and it didn't get any better during the war. Kimmel and Short were simply the obvious fall guys. Kinda like the Captains on the Titanic, and the ship which tried to use wireless to warn Titanic. I would say that many of these fall guys are pre-sellected, as well. For many reasons I believe that the 9-11 attacks were indeed the second Pearl Harbor. Heroics on Flight 93, ruined things due to cell phone coverages which were never taken into account. Those passengers weren't supposed to know what had just happened in New York City. But NYC was only the diversion for the main attacks, in and around Washington D.C. In the Blitz at Pearl, the Carriers weren't home in port. In Wash. D.C. only some partly empty and non strategic offices were demolished.
originally posted by: anti72
the russion fotos will show further evidence that the towers were brought down with a nuclear demolition device underneath .
You could be correct...but if it is irrefutable....what does that do for you as an american (if that is what you are).
originally posted by: ParasuvO
HelloBruce agrees that chunks of steel weighing many tons are flying up to 200 yards away from the building, but that they are not flying upwards, and yet we CAN see that they are going upwards since they do not start going lower until having left the buildings area till at least 200 feet away, they RUSH outwards, UPWARDS from where a lot of the tower was ALREADY GONE, any IDIOT can see it.
FACT: Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) team that worked on the FEMA report.
Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air—along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse—was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."
Demolition expert Romero regrets that his comments to the Albuquerque Journal became fodder for conspiracy theorists. "I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building," he tells PM. "I only said that that's what it looked like."
originally posted by: samkent
Where's the pictures?
It's been 8 days since the original article.
Heck we are getting pictures from Pluto quicker than Russia.
They could have posted them on a torrent site to guarantee worldwide distribution.