It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US fears Russian publication of satellite photos of 9/11

page: 14
101
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: plube
a reply to: Indigo5

Wow..OK...you answer your own question

Why would any news agency report it coming down before it came down...did that reporter just decide on her own

Hey building seven is coming down.


No...she likely made a mistake in the craziness of the day...which had a ton of mistaken reporting.

Hell I had a buddy working at the State Department and NPR said there was a report of car bomb going off at the State Department...never happened.

It was effen insane that day..

BIG DEAL...some reporter GOT IT WRONG....as DID MANY REPORTERS THAT DAY...LIVE WITH IT...

Saying something like we are told that building 7 has collapsed...in the middle of absolute CHOAS...does not make an inside job.

That is some sad, very weak "evidence"..

SO...Which is more likely? The newscaster mistakenly reporting that a building (that people were expecting to collapse) did...before the actual collapse..

Or the CIA Black Operations specialist distributing their plan to murder 3000 Americans and blame it on terrorists in advance to the news media as a heads-up trusting they wouldn't tell anyone....and jane doe reporter accidently reports the buildings collapse early...ooops.


edit on 12-2-2015 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: plube
a reply to: jhn7537

I starred you as your comments are the most honest...and reasonable ones in this entire thread...thank you so much for jumping in and responding with such honesty...I now have absolute faith in the human race...I applaud you to the Nth degree....


Thanks for the kind words.. So many get hyped and excited over this type of hypothetical, but with me, I can't even imagine the damage it would cause. It is honestly hard for my mind to even compute, similar to when I try to picture how big the universe is.... It just hurts my mind.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5



Sorry just had to look at that one with analysis...just for a wee bit of fun...

Yuppers...mistake...big mistake though huh...

So this media we should trust any more than say ummmm...pravda.

Frankly I trust neither ...so once again..If the evidence given is irrefutable... Does that change anything...and from that completely honest post previously.... I would say it does.
edit on 062828p://f06Thursday by plube because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:07 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5




Hell I had a buddy working at the State Department and NPR said there was a report of car bomb going off at the State Department...never happened.


Right, and what would your thoughts be if, half an hour after your buddy told you that, a car bomb did go off?



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: Indigo5




Hell I had a buddy working at the State Department and NPR said there was a report of car bomb going off at the State Department...never happened.


Right, and what would your thoughts be if, half an hour after your buddy told you that, a car bomb did go off?


Still not getting it...

There was a ton of mistaken reporting that day...

People were speculating about if/when building 7 would collapse when she reported it had...

Not the same thing....

You guys still can't explain ANY reason why that report would indicate conspiracy...why the news media would be in on it...or why the simple explanation of error (as the building is still standing behind her) is not considered???

WHY would the Secret People that you claim murdered 3k Americans bring the news media + Foreign Media BBC in on their plans in advance?

It is old fashioned, bleary eyed...crazy town on this thread.
edit on 12-2-2015 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)

edit on 12-2-2015 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: jhn7537

It is very hypothetical... And I think Russia knows that If they had something so damning exactly how damaging it could be...and your answers I think shows that the US knows that it could be damaging(if true). So in this propaganda war which I know it be ...just as before ww1 and ww2 the propaganda flowed thick and fast...well I see no difference now..and I think bargaining chips are being played...I have been vocal on my opinions on 9/11 ...and continue to be...but if there was reliable irrefutable evidence showing 9/11 was an inside job...then I think it is a game changer.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: plube
but if there was reliable irrefutable evidence showing 9/11 was an inside job


As it was not a inside job such evidence does not exist, it is just another silly claim made by a truther, just like all their other false silly claims.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:23 PM
link   
According to an official Columbia University white paper under 911-Research, produced in collaboration with world renown scientists, seismologists and geologists:

Six seismic stations within the greater Metropolitan New York region recorded the planes hitting the towers, and also their collapse. Not one showed any precursor blast before the impact or collapses, as would be shown in a seismic charts, nor did they show any additional shock waves during those events. Analysis of the energy conversion, given the planes, buildings and the bedrock below it all, show mathematics consistent with those elements and calculated forces alone.

Sounds in the Earth don't lie.

Source: 911 Research
edit on 12-2-2015 by charlyv because: spelling , where caught

edit on 12-2-2015 by charlyv because: ditto



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

It is the media that sold the lie to the people...all media is owned...the reporters DO NOT decide what gets said...they get told what IS TO BE SAID...so some Numbskull released the script early...bad bad person....this was not in the early hours of 9/11....it was later in the day....7 hours later in the day...heck it was weeks before people even started to question building seven....but they were calling it the Saloman brothers building....she had no idea what she was talking about....it was scripted...someone got fired over that for giving the script out early...not a leg to stand on on this one.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Yep. Apparently you're still not getting it. That's two questions you've completely avoided answering by going off on a tangent about "super secret agents" and whatnot. Have you seen the videos? And what would your reaction be to the scenario I proposed in the last post?



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: charlyv
According to an official Columbia University white paper under 911-Research, produced in collaboration with world renown scientists, seismologists and geologists:

Six seismic stations within the greater Metropolitan New York region recorded the planes hitting the towers, and also their collapse. Not one showed any precursor blast before the impact or collapses, as would be shown in a seismic charts, nor did they show any additional shock waves during those events. Analysis of the energy conversion, given the planes, buildings and the bedrock below it all, show mathematics consistent with those elements and caclulated forces alone.

Sounds in the Earth don't lie.


Remember however, they used silent explosives that leave no trace....



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: plube
someone got fired over that for giving the script out early....


Your evidence for someone getting fired over that is what exactly?



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce




Remember however, they used silent explosives that leave no trace....


Yea, must have been a "Tesla Weapon". Whatever that is.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 06:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5




I am confused...In your conspiracy theory..where some super-secretive government agency kills 3,000 of it's own people and pretends it's a terrorist attack..


That is the 911 conspiracy in a nut shell, and they conveniently leave out 40 years of terrorist attacks here, and abroad.

Like the first World Trade Center, and the USS Cole, and embassy' attacks, and movies made about it.



Remember now that's the same people who blew the Cuban,and Iranian government's overthrows, but they were ironman with the twin towers, pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania.

Might as well give up arguing about 9-11.

The true believers know the US government was behind it!

The only reason it has stuck around so long as because some people want to believe it.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 07:44 PM
link   
Good ! I hope they do release it, Israel will be bricking themselves to be exposed for what they are and the resulting backlash



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 07:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: rowanflame
Good ! I hope they do release it,


Release what? They have nothing.


Israel will be bricking themselves to be exposed for what they are and the resulting backlash


Nonsense, Israel had nothing to do with it.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 08:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: soulwaxer
This is all the proof I need. Go to 0:10 and watch the left side of your screen halfway between the middle and the top.

You see those chunks of steel weighing many tons flying the length of a couple football fields at an UPward angle? I challenge anyone to find footage of anything whatsoever collapsing where chunks of it shoot out in all directions 360° in a horizontal to even an upward angle, trailing white smoke...

This is really a no-brainer folks. LOOK at what is happening to that building. It is EXPLODING!!!

soulwaxer


HelloBruce agrees that chunks of steel weighing many tons are flying up to 200 yards away from the building, but that they are not flying upwards, and yet we CAN see that they are going upwards since they do not start going lower until having left the buildings area till at least 200 feet away, they RUSH outwards, UPWARDS from where a lot of the tower was ALREADY GONE, any IDIOT can see it.

This has gone on for so long, it is time for you to fall and we are going to make sure you feel it in full this year.

None of your silly stupid acting can help you, it only reinforces just how badly the likes of you are damaged.

This stuff explodes in a manner JUST LIKE a fireworks display would or a VOLCANO, rumbling INSANE disintegration, ejection of material in directions that are not possible in ANY sort of situation without EXPLOSIVE HELP.

I volunteer that these people who tell us those buildings are not being pulverized by other means are easily worse than ISIS, in the fact they deny total and obvious truth.

The truth is HELLOBRUCE, EVEN YOU KNOW THIS EJECTION OF DEBRIS is NOT GRAVITY!!!

Tell us AGAIN how stupid and silly we are for SEEING AN EXPLODING TOTALLY DESTROYED BUILDING, and argue how GRAVITY CAUSED IT.



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 08:10 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Ya , tell us again this building is COLLAPSING LOL!!



posted on Feb, 12 2015 @ 08:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: ParasuvO
but that they are not flying upwards, and yet we CAN see that they are going upwards


What are you babbling about? As expected, they are falling downwards, not upwards. Show us one falling upwards by tracing its path.


This has gone on for so long, it is time for you to fall and we are going to make sure you feel it in full this year.


Who is "we"?

Truthers have been telling silly stories for 10+ years, the money from the gullible appears to be drying up.

What is even funnier when a truther shows a video to back their claim up, but if they had actually watched said video they would have seen it does not back their claim up at all!

edit on 12-2-2015 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
101
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join