It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anti vaxxers a simple question.

page: 6
11
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 08:06 PM
link   
Simple question back at you. How many people died from the measle outbreak? How many died from the vaccine?




posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 08:31 PM
link   
I'll make a point here. If the concern is that they can't discern if the vaccine causes autism or sids, why not just move the schedule up a bit? Have the vaccines given at ages of 4 or so, so you know if the kid is fine before hand, and they are more developed and able to handle it. But this issue is obviously politicized due to profits, otherwise there would be a push to mandate breast feeding, which is a baby's strongest immune boost and protection from disease at that stage, as it passes on the mothers antibodies, so the whole politicization is not "for the children!", it's "for the money!!"



posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

Determining what is injected into your body is a human right. Vaccines have risk. It's well known.




In 2011, the Supreme Court said, ‘Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe, and therefore there shall be no product liability lawsuits against manufacturers, even if we could provide evidence that the vaccine could be made safer.’


Reject transhumanism in all its forms. Being a regular human is good enough.



posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 09:15 PM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

Notice how few flags you get VS my thread that logically explains issue with vaccine




posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 09:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Unity_99
Simple question back at you. How many people died from the measle outbreak?

So far, 110. That's just the number from the outbreak's country of origin. There have been a few more deaths in other involved countries.


How many died from the vaccine?

During this outbreak? I' m not aware of any. Throughout all of history? I've heard of a few cases of immunocompromised people mistakenly receiving the vaccine, and dying as a result.



posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: pexx421

In the 50s and 60s and even later, vaccines were made without adjuvant or thiremisol. This made them last very short time like merely 1 month, and even shorter if sporadically refrigerated

Once the industry started solving the shelving problem with chemicals and metals in vaccines

That is when human immune system started causing fevers that end in autism that later is diagnosed as the baby grows
edit on 10-2-2015 by PizzaAnyday505 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: PizzaAnyday505

That's a problem too. Why not just take the chemicals out and charge us the extra few cents per vaccine that they save with mercury and other such toxins?



posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 09:56 PM
link   
And I'm speaking as a person who has a sister that stopped breathing for 6minutes (irreparable brain damage occurs after four minutes) shortly after taking vaccines, on two occasions, has been extremely intellectually limited since, and the doctors refused to admit any connection to the vaccines.



posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

you are asking a binary question. Have vaccines saved millions of lives or not?. Yes or no. This is the wrong question.




So If you want these diseases to come back don't get vaccinated. "



your lack of insight is dangerous because of its shallow thinking. Vaccines ARE NOT a guarantee.


From the CDC's own website.

Q: Can a child get a disease even after being vaccinated?
A: It isn’t very common, but it can happen.

About 1% to 5% of the time, depending on the vaccine, a child who is vaccinated fails to develop immunity. If these children are exposed to that disease they could get sick. Sometimes giving an additional vaccine dose will stimulate an immune response in a child who didn’t respond to one dose. For example, a single dose of measles vaccine protects about 95% of children, but after two doses almost 100% are immune.

Sometimes a child is exposed to a disease just prior to being vaccinated, and gets sick before the vaccine has time to work.

Sometimes a child gets sick with something that is similar to a disease they have been vaccinated against. This often happens with flu. Many viruses cause symptoms that look like flu, and people even call some of them flu, even though they are really something else. Flu vaccine doesn’t protect from these viruses.


Q: Can a child actually get the disease from a vaccine?
A: Almost never. With inactivated (killed) vaccines, it isn’t possible. A dead virus or bacteria, or part of a virus or bacteria, can’t cause disease.

With live vaccines, some children get what appears to be a mild case of disease (for example what looks like a measles or chickenpox rash but with only a few spots). This isn’t harmful, and can actually show that the vaccine is working.

A vaccine causing full-blown disease would be extremely unlikely. One exception was the live oral polio vaccine, which could very rarely mutate and actually cause a case of polio. This was a rare but tragic side effect of this otherwise effective vaccine. Oral polio vaccine is no longer used in the U.S.



posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 10:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: th3dudeabides
your lack of insight is dangerous because of its shallow thinking. Vaccines ARE NOT a guarantee.


From the CDC's own website.

Q: Can a child get a disease even after being vaccinated?
A: It isn’t very common, but it can happen.
...

You have just made an excellent case for herd immunity, and for the widespread vaccination that is required to maintain herd immunity.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:36 AM
link   
a reply to: PizzaAnyday505

Wow flag and stars...thats what you are bothered about?.
It isn't a competition. How mature pf you.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:37 AM
link   
I wish people would answer the question.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:50 AM
link   
a reply to: th3dudeabides

When was the last person to die of smallpox?.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:55 AM
link   



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:56 AM
link   
Another question.

Would you not take any vaccine?. Or just the unfashionable ones?. (lol)



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 02:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: PizzaAnyday505
a reply to: boymonkey74

Notice how few flags you get VS my thread that logically explains issue with vaccine



You really believe that's a metric of anything meaningful?

Oh honey!



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 02:54 AM
link   
a reply to: boymonkey74

Not all vaccines are bad. Just the ones containing mercury. If you can explain to me the logical reason WHY mercury is even in some of these vaccines I would be immensely impressed.

Where's the cancer vaccine?

Those royals, Bushes, Kissengers and the like sure do live long lives....



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 03:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Involutionist

ETHYLmercury is a harmless substance.
METHYLmercury is the big bad on.

Vaccines contained traces of ETHYLmercurary as a preservative and antimicrobial agent. It was (and still is) harmless but was removed as a safety precaution after Wakefield's fraudulent paper. It's no longer in vaccines (and even if it was, would be harmless).

This whole "vaccines contain mercury" meme needs to die already.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 03:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Unity_99

1 in 1000 chance of death from measles
Less than 1 in a million chance of death from MMR



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 03:41 AM
link   
a reply to: AngryAtTheBlindBelief

Stop moving the goalposts and stay on topic.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join