It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Operation Indigo Skyfold

page: 15
24
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus
What is the official story for the WWII trails?




posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots

Why don't you research it yourself?

Instead of lapping up whatever someone says on YouTube.



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:24 PM
link   
What to make of the claims that those trails weren't around before the 90s? Does he think before he speaks?



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bedlam
Let's see him come up with some actual evidence that substantiates the 'when they started', other than 'oh, you found one in the early 40's?

On Wigington's website there is this article: The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: “Owning the Weather” for Military Use


Environmental modification techniques have been applied by the US military for more than half a century. US mathematician John von Neumann, in liaison with the US Department of Defense, started his research on weather modification in the late 1940s at the height of the Cold War and foresaw ‘forms of climatic warfare as yet unimagined’. During the Vietnam war, cloud-seeding techniques were used, starting in 1967 under Project Popeye, the objective of which was to prolong the monsoon season and block enemy supply routes along the Ho Chi Minh Trail.



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

I'm responding to your post and asking you for information about it.

What do you know about it?



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:39 PM
link   
a reply to: DenyObfuscation

Are you sure it was Dane Wigington who made those claims?

Because if it was not him, why should he be held responsible for them?



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots
I'm not sure if he has ever actually claimed that or not. Regardless, my point is he just kicked a bunch of his disciples square in the teeth with that.



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: Chadwickus
What is the official story for the WWII trails?





They are contrails.

Why are you not able to find that yourself since you claim to do a lot of research??



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 08:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
That info can't be true because it contradicts his claims. Tyrannis ergo veritas!!!!



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul

As I stated, I was interested in the knowledge of the person who brought it up.

Why are you so hostile?



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:15 PM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots
I see 1940s in the text but no explanation for ''chemtrails'' then.

Contrails have been around longer than that anyway. Please check out the link in ATG's post.



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul

As I stated, I was interested in the knowledge of the person who brought it up.

Why are you so hostile?


Why are you so sensitive? See, that's not getting us anywhere. Can we just stick to the topic?



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:21 PM
link   
a reply to: DenyObfuscation

Not necessarily.

"Disciples" is a very strong word. I'm not sure it applies at all.

And when people are in a search for the truth, they freely state the facts as they know them, regardless.

I say activists who are trying to piece together the truth going up against the military-industrial complex should be forgiven for making some mistakes.



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: ConnectDots
I see 1940s in the text but no explanation for ''chemtrails'' then.

The document is not purported to be an explanation of how we prove that what we're looking at in the sky is a chemtrail.

The purpose is to show the purpose of chemtrails.



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:30 PM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots
Disciples, followers, blessed children of the lovemind of one, whatever you want to call them. I. Don't. Care.

He kicked them in the teeth. All who have waved the ''chemtrails'' weren't around before the 90s banner. It's a tenet of the ''chemtrail theory''.


edit on 9-7-2015 by DenyObfuscation because: effin tired



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: ConnectDots

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: ConnectDots
I see 1940s in the text but no explanation for ''chemtrails'' then.

The document is not purported to be an explanation of how we prove that what we're looking at in the sky is a chemtrail.

The purpose is to show the purpose of chemtrails.


Take a look at your post and what you replied to www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
The answer to both questions is he claims those engines are ''Virtually incapable of producing contrails''.

You are talking about Herndon, right?



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots
No. The ''Intrepid'' one. The Great Dane.



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: DenyObfuscation

The reply to Bedlam was to show when they started.

The document that shows it is about the military and what their goals are.

What is your point of contention?



posted on Jul, 9 2015 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: DenyObfuscation

You brought it up in reference to the Herndon interview that you posted, though.

So, there's no point in listening to it again?



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join