It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russian advisor suggests supporting an Iranian attack against Saudi Arabia

page: 6
16
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 13 2015 @ 08:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: noeltrotsky

And a whole third of Ukraine doesn't want the government in Kiev.


And half the United States doesn't want the government in Washington D.C., but you don't see us turning to Russia for arms!




posted on Feb, 13 2015 @ 08:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: noeltrotsky

And a whole third of Ukraine doesn't want the government in Kiev.


And half the United States doesn't want the government in Washington D.C., but you don't see us turning to Russia for arms!


Give it time lol



posted on Feb, 13 2015 @ 08:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: sosobad

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: sosobad
a reply to: noeltrotsky

And a whole third of Ukraine doesn't want the government in Kiev.


And half the United States doesn't want the government in Washington D.C., but you don't see us turning to Russia for arms!


Give it time lol


aiiiesh

you ain't even kiddin! You hear these echoes in places...

unfortunately, I doubt that would garner much but provide a use for the camps.

I think the US "got this" most of the US us apathetic and bring Iran into anything let's them unleash the "dog" Israel... Iran wouldn't last the month.



posted on Feb, 16 2015 @ 07:08 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

ohh did they? how did they do that? do you have any proof?



posted on Feb, 16 2015 @ 07:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: AVoiceOfReason
a reply to: DJW001

ohh did they? how did they do that? do you have any proof?


Here's the ballot. See for yourself:



They can either remain in Ukraine or join the Russian Federation. There is no option for independence.



posted on Feb, 16 2015 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

oh i misread what you said. either way they were given a choice and they made it.
edit on 16-2-2015 by AVoiceOfReason because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2015 @ 08:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: AVoiceOfReason
a reply to: DJW001

oh i misread what you said.


There's a lot of that going around on these threads. Have a star for your honesty.



posted on Feb, 16 2015 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

yeah well when your just waking up and you reading replies from 20 different people its hard to tell whats what.



posted on Feb, 18 2015 @ 03:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: CrikeyMagnet
a reply to: Britguy
Meaning a response by Iran and Russia could be "justified" as retaliation for an economic attack. It would be a physical attack against the economic aggressor, which would have the added benefit of immediately improving oil prices.


Only in Putin's paranoid mind is a low-cost producer selling more product anything like invading a neighbor.

Should he attack Iowa next for selling too much cheap wheat against his low-productivity farms?



posted on Feb, 18 2015 @ 05:28 PM
link   
Firstly Excellent thread.
So if the PTB are slowly manipulating such scenarios (Italy IS) Saudi v Iran(Russia) Boko Haram v Africa this would suggest the greatest manipulative propaganda provocation in recent history in the fact we are addressing such scenarios as we always are, so think tanks can gauge opinion and further accidentally leak the drivel that succeeds the imprint of in-factual scope to fine tune the lens to the eventual theater of panem et circenses if the ones are eventual singularity just how many iterations are needed for the realization of this?



posted on Feb, 18 2015 @ 10:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: mbkennel

originally posted by: CrikeyMagnet
a reply to: Britguy
Meaning a response by Iran and Russia could be "justified" as retaliation for an economic attack. It would be a physical attack against the economic aggressor, which would have the added benefit of immediately improving oil prices.


Only in Putin's paranoid mind is a low-cost producer selling more product anything like invading a neighbor.

Should he attack Iowa next for selling too much cheap wheat against his low-productivity farms?


Don't give him any ideas! If you noticed Putin has to sell the fact he was provoked otherwise he is exposed for being a power hungry dictator. To sell this he talks about NATO expansion though Russia wss actually a part of NATO seeing As They Had Offices Sat in on briefings and conducted joint exsersizes with NATO. But we hear people scream all the time NATO was surrounding Russia. First Russia is a damn big place but that aside NATO all ready warned Ukraine they can't join why because Russia objected.

To use this as an excuse is just lame and wreaks of BS. Russia needed the revolt in Ukraine in fact wanted it they could have easily bailed Yanukovuh out of trouble. All he would have had to do is make an offer to him that he could take back to the Ukrainian people and he'd still be there. As they say make a better offer than the EU. He chose not to at first I didn't understand why now I think it was he wanted his administration to fail. And unfortunately for Yanukovych he thought he had Putins full support we see that as he fled to Russia in the middle of the night. Though later Yanukovych figures it out bit to late when he said the Russians need to stay out of it. Oddly also ended us hearing from him anymore think he's in jail?

Putin needed it to go down like it did he has never given up on his idea of a trade union and it has to be with eastern Europe.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join