It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Presenting an outside threat

page: 1

log in


posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 12:41 PM

Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the world government.

This is a quote from Henry Kissinger, one of the players in the formation of the NWO.

Does anyone else have a sense of deja vu after reading this? It seems like the NWO uses the same exact tactics as religion. They present an outside threat (Satan) then present a solution to the problem they created, which is their respective dogma or doctrine. When one believes in Satan and hell they naturally fear it, that fear makes them willingly relinquish personal rights in favor of their well-being. In this case they willingly relinquish their right to think critically and to question deeply held beliefs in favor of a warm fuzzy feeling inside, a.k.a. "I'm going to heaven and not that scary place called hell".

They did this with 9/11, they presented an outside threat (Al Qaeda/terrorists) then gave us the solution of going to war with them all while giving up our rights here at home. The attacks made people so afraid that they willingly gave up privacy and personal rights for their safety from the threat their own government created. Fear is what drives people to give up their rights, hell is a tool of fear used on believers in order for them to submit to the churches "authority" and to relinquish critical thinking skills.

Just thought I'd share this with y'all. I thought is was a pretty interesting similarity personally.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 12:47 PM
Sadly the falsely elevated threat to make the public more amenable to losing their freedoms or rights has been in the playbook a long time.

The US constitution and Bill of Rights were well written and should work equally well in time of war or peace. That we let our fear scare us into accepting more government intrusion into our lives is tragic.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 01:11 PM
I would say that this is highly dependent on where you are talking about. I'm sure some of the more pansied places would roll over and play dead for them ... then you have the places where we still remember how to defend ourselves. They better think to occupy us with our own or they've got a fight on their hands. Heck, remember the Bundy Ranch? Occupying us with our own might not even work that well.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 01:23 PM
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Ah yes. The proponents of world government, controlled by the less than 1%. Lovely folks they are...

"David Rockefeller Sept. 23, 1994 "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long — We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." —Woodrow Wilson

"[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions." — Henry Kissinger

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." James Warburg

"All of us will ultimately be judged on the effort we have contributed to building a NEW WORLD ORDER." —Robert Kennedy

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes." —Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court

And of course, there's always...

...Reagan, echoing Kissinger's sentiments.
edit on 2/10/2015 by Klassified because: formatting

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 01:28 PM
a reply to: ketsuko

There are billions who just roll over and play dead for their religious beliefs. This is because an outside force named Satan is after your soul, so you better secure your well being and ticket to heaven by just "rolling over" to whatever their doctrine says.

I'm drawing a parallel between the NWO and religion in general. They use the same fear mongering tactics to win people over to their side. In the case of the NWO it is terrorists, in the case of religion it's Satan.

NWO uses terrorists to sell their lies, religion uses Satan to sell theirs. Same song, different singer, they're both trying to sell a record though.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 01:31 PM
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Satan isn't the only threat used in the bible. God himself is to be feared, as one who can destroy both body and soul. And will pour out his wrath upon the earth in the last days. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 01:36 PM
a reply to: Klassified

Which is exactly why I see the god of the bible as being "Satan" personified. Fearing Satan is the same as fearing god because god IS Satan in the bible.

Those who run the NWO are the same ones who run religion, which is why their tactics are identical to one another.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 02:10 PM
I think our understanding of the impacting constituents of our total reality is sparse. Can't help but feel like we're on the verge of learning something very important though.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 03:18 PM
You want to link the nwo with religion but in truth science is their god and tool.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 03:49 PM
a reply to: deadeyedick

A little bit of everything is their tool if truth be told, but religion has been their biggest success.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 06:19 PM
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

New World order is when Heaven or hell takes over. Hope humanity turn to God and love their neighbour as their selves rather than dominate and destroy each other.

New World Order for The SPIRIT'S Freedom through Love and Humility not of the flesh with money, credit cards, microchips and guns.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 08:03 PM

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: deadeyedick

A little bit of everything is their tool if truth be told, but religion has been their biggest success.

There biggest sucess is using science to create new ways to manipulate and kill.
We chose this path in the garden.
Science and knowledge is the root of the problem.
Two things we never needed to be happy or content.
I am not saying religion is in the greatest shape but that eliminating religion tomorrow would allow the biggest religion of all to continue to subvert mankind down this path we are on.
Get rid on technology tomorrow and a whole new world would open up to us. One where things happen that today are myths.

posted on Feb, 10 2015 @ 08:20 PM
Excerpt from “Amusing Ourselves To Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business,” by Neil Postman

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions”. In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.”

I fail to see the connection between Satan and Terrorism as the main tool for the NWO. It seems to me that the makers of the Global Utopia use whatever they can get their hands on. As of late they are using our own habitat against us. Blaming us for the destruction of the world when THEY are the ones who are destroying it. The average citizen or resident of a nation are not responsible for all the pollution or inhumane treatment of animals or peoples. Yet the poorest people, least guilty of these crimes are persecuted and mistreated worse than anyone. For those that suffer the most is where God steps to comfort, NOT condemn. "The least shall be made great and the great shall be made least." People can choose to believe whatever they want. God does not need anyone to lay there hand upon a book and swear fealty. God wants justice for those who deserve it and He WILL see that they get it.

new topics


log in