It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
there are a couple of caps on the upper limit for nucleons.
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
The thing is, theoretically there's an infinite number of elements since element number is only determined by proton count, and I am not aware of an upper cap. The issue is that once you start getting that high everything has an unbelievably short half-life.
As to whether or not I believe Bob Lazar... I'm not sure, really. What I do think is that it is not as simple as one might initially assume.
originally posted by: tjocksteffe
Yes, Bob Lazar is legit.
Its hard to come to another conclusion if you do your homework.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: tjocksteffe
Yes, Bob Lazar is legit.
Its hard to come to another conclusion if you do your homework.
Yea he is legit to me, enough anyway, because air craft using flight power of non conventional means, no visible propulsion system ect have been observed up close.
originally posted by: jordan77
Has there ever been a good explanation presented of how he knew when the test flights were going on that he took Lead and Huff to watch?
originally posted by: Archivalist
Ok, what WOULD a gravity researcher say, in your opinion? Which is definitely what they would say, since you are an expert in that field. Obviously, qualified to speak for all gravity researchers on their approach to explaining their work.
originally posted by: Archivalist
Uh, yeah... During that interview, both theories of gravity waves and the existence of gravitons were open for consideration, because we had not recorded any peer reviewed evidence yet, for either phenomenon.
originally posted by: Archivalist
We have synthesized 115 in a lab. True. However, it could be that he was referring to the isotope of Moscovium that we really CAN NOT synthesize in a lab.
There is an isotope of 115 that IS theorized to be stable, utilizing the isle of stability positioning. And yes, that stable version, while REAL scientists believe that it does exist we have NEVER been able to produce and observe it.
While it is true that Moscovium isn't "stable" it does have behavior that is expected to achieve relative stability. This is extrapolated by it's location in an elemental isle of stability.
Because he couldn't have possibly known about the results of those post-2000 research publications in the 80's and 90's... Unless... He was exposed to advanced technological knowledge that was accurate, decades before it began to be studied...
And I mean that's just asinine. It must be a giant hoax, and he must be a liar.
originally posted by: Archivalist
Why anyone would think he didn't get paid well for this...his contract probably gave him a percentage if not just a one time fee."
Golly gee, you know what I like most about this statement? The word 'probably' indicating that this is conjecture and wouldn't be allowed in a court of law as admissable.
originally posted by: Archivalist
Bring me some evidence of this claim you are making, and we could probably get a lawfirm to pro-bono start a class action lawsuit against that network, the documentary producer, and Lazar, and have them all indicted for felony fraud.
Since that would be a slam dunk legal case, that any attorney would be happy to litigate.
originally posted by: Archivalist
"It was a quick scam and who knows what other interviews and lectures he got booked for after this?"
Well, apparently not you, seeing as how you didn't provide any citations indicating that your conjecture is the way it actually happened.
I'm sorry if you don't like my answer. Was your sentence not supposed to be a question? My mistake then, there's nothing about your sentence that could possibly make it a question and not a statement, thereby relieving you of any potential liability for defamation and libel.
I mean, that question mark at the end of your statement doesn't make it a question. How could that be the case? The English language obviously dictates that sentences that end with a question mark, are not questions.
originally posted by: Archivalist
And honestly, if someone was giving out black project secrets, creating a campaign against their credibility and removing their work and school records seems like it would be the best course of action... As opposed to 6 bullets in the victim's back from a "suicide" which could be more you know, a tiny bit more suspicious. That may even grant the claims' further need for attention and consideration as true.t
originally posted by: play4keeps
As for 115, different isotope not electrons are the key to understanding the properties. Whether or not binary systems created these isotopes or not, I suggest looking at the John Hutchinson videos and you might get some of the picture about what is occurring if you have the right energy source. May I remind the forum that 4 major scientific publications control the flow of physics information and most of the good stuff is censored. If you don't believe this or understand it, I don't know what to say other than you do not understand what has happened in science since 1947 or even '43 (after Tesla was murdered and his papers confiscated).
originally posted by: play4keeps
For the naysayers, I will say most are ignorant. You understand not the physics of the craft because you fail to understand science because it is not the standard model as you are taught. For the believers, the reality is much more complex and you understand not the ways that were designed to throw things off to the uninitiated. Most important, for Bob Lazar, the higher probability is he did not make most of the stuff up he was handed. In this case, he would not be a liar.
originally posted by: Archivalist
General relativity is not an explanation for gravity's existence and causation. It is an idea with a mathematical formula that corroborates our observations of gravity and spacetime. It does not have any information in terms of "gravity exists because x or gravity functions by y"
originally posted by: Archivalist
Elements have these things called isotopes.
Element 115 has isotopes that fit Lazar's description. Also, can you show me when Lazar explicitly states that it breaks thermodynamics? Even if he did make that statement, we have not seen the isle of stability isotope of 115. Therefore, we can not test that claim, anyway.
originally posted by: Archivalist
If you would like to make the claim that no isotope of element 115 breaks thermodynamics, then please show me where and when every isotope of Moscovium has been tested against that claim.
originally posted by: Archivalist
I've heard of people claiming to be mind readers, but claiming to read the mind of the periodic table is some jazzy news to me.
originally posted by: Archivalist
The second law of thermodynamics can be "broken" depending on the abstraction layer of your scrutiny. If you are testing an isolated system, you may show thermodynamics is broken within that system, if you ignore the reactions that exist in a system outside of your scrutiny.
I am actually well versed in multiverse theory and the publications of Max Tegmark. Something in spacetime can "break" thermodynamics, as long as the counteracting balance reaction is occurring outside of space time. We can't observe outside of spacetime. So if something is utilizing thermodynamics in this way, we can only observe the "breaking" of it. We can't observe the preservation of thermodynamics occurring outside of spacetime.