It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama slips up: pro US troops?

page: 2
14
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 12:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

You still believe Iraq was building and stockpiling WMD's? Even after GW Bush admitted there were none and the intelligence was flawed?

I suppose you also believed they were shipped off to Syria?





posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:31 AM
link   
Building? HELL no .
Stockpiling..what do you call what was left or whatever we gave them ?
WHICH was what I think they wanted BACK.
The got some uranium but THEY didn't do anything with it.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: moronic
a reply to: Xcathdra

So, Do i also need to post some links about not finding the WMD? not just some but many links.

and about Wikileaks, it's more of a anti US site now.

#We are all intellectual dweebs.




Anti US site... lol



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 01:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
a reply to: Xcathdra

You still believe Iraq was building and stockpiling WMD's? Even after GW Bush admitted there were none and the intelligence was flawed?

I suppose you also believed they were shipped off to Syria?



Feel free to point out where I stated such thing in my post. You guys really need to stop assuming.
edit on 11-2-2015 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 04:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
Building? HELL no .
Stockpiling..what do you call what was left or whatever we gave them ?
WHICH was what I think they wanted BACK.
The got some uranium but THEY didn't do anything with it.


90% of it was destroyed after GW1 and the rest rotted away to be nothing but useless scrap. Thus, we didn't find any.

the whole premise for 'that' war was he was building and stockpiling weapons ready for use.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 04:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

oh I am sorry it must have been someone else posting these links



uhm ok.....

* - WikiLeaks Docs Prove Saddam Had WMD, Threats Remain

* - US did find Iraq WMD

* - WikiLeaks Show WMD Hunt Continued in Iraq – With Surprising Results

* - Yes, Iraq Definitely Had WMD, Vast Majority Of Polled Republicans Insist

* - Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria

* - Saddam Sent WMD to Syria, Former General Alleges

* - Israeli airstrike reignites debate on Syrian nuclear ambitions



in reply to someone saying


I slightly turned off from U.S Politics after U.S-Iraq invasion in 2003 claiming Iraq have got Weapons of Mass Destruction. Which wasn't completely true.


you can see how it appears so.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 05:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

and no where in any of those articles am I quoted / referenced saying Iraq was building wmds. My response was to the person who claimed there were no wmds in Iraq.

The evidence says otherwise.

Respectfully I don't see how it appears I am of the mindset wmds were being built / stockpiled.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 05:32 AM
link   
"My response was to the person who claimed there were no wmds in Iraq".

I personally do not/will not claim anything about WMD, it's the source, as i said earlier i can provide those sources or you can easily find it yourselves.

"The evidence says otherwise".

It is just a link. It doesn't mean it is the rightful credible source to the TRUE EVIDENCE. Please be relevant.

Thank you.



edit on 11-2-2015 by moronic because: s



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 05:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: moronic
a reply to: Xcathdra

So, Do i also need to post some links about not finding the WMD? not just some but many links.

and about Wikileaks, it's more of a anti US site now.

#We are all intellectual dweebs.




Anti US site... lol


I Just don't know why you LOL there.. I guess you assume to know much.
edit on 11-2-2015 by moronic because: s



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 05:45 AM
link   
All sides should step aside and allow China to aid Ukraine in having elections. China seems to be the only sane government on earth these days.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 05:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: moronic
"My response was to the person who claimed there were no wmds in Iraq".

I personally do not/will not claim anything about WMD, it's the source, as i said earlier i can provide those sources or you can easily find it yourselves.

"The evidence says otherwise".

It is just a link. It doesn't mean it is the rightful credible source to the TRUE EVIDENCE. Please be relevant.

Thank you.




WMD or not which there was but only old forgot stuff that was falling apart. The truth is Saddam posed no threat to the US and it's allies. Bush caused the death of many Iraq's and American soldiers for absolutely nothing.

That's right, American Soldiers who died in Iraq died for no reason what so ever other than Bush's agenda.
edit on 11-2-2015 by Xeven because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 06:17 AM
link   
Apparently World is concerned about highlighted countries, about their policies, plotting, planning, conspiracies.

I am just concerned and curious to know the truth. I am not against any countries.

*9/11 conspiracies
*revelation of confidential classified documents about US plotting by whistle blower (Snowden, Manning)
*Muammar Gaddafi who was brought down by US agencies for their merits. (I personally find gaddafi as a great leader )
*Gary Webb's articles about CIA's wrongdoing. ETC ETC.

There are so much issues about the U.S so, i am just more up to it.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 06:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: moronic
a reply to: Xcathdra


originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: moronic
a reply to: Xcathdra

So, Do i also need to post some links about not finding the WMD? not just some but many links.

and about Wikileaks, it's more of a anti US site now.

#We are all intellectual dweebs.




Anti US site... lol


I Just don't know why you LOL there.. I guess you assume to know much.


Because its been an anti us site the moment they started leaking classified documents. Since it is an anti US site please explain the rationale that wikileaks would release information that supports the US on this issue.



posted on Feb, 11 2015 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

WHO exactly did that? Iwas THERE and nothing was put out except for Khamisya.
I 'd like to see THAT information.
Wonder what the KURDS got hit with then...

edit on 11-2-2015 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1   >>

log in

join