Why do so many whistle blowers eventually begin to rant nutty stuff?

No complete sanity here...granted...
But even still, there appears to be certain defensive methods that the PTB uses for discrediting some....
I am wondering just how many are affected.....
What is done to destroy credibility
And if psyops are deliberately mounted when the info is perhaps very destabilising to the PTB.
Like designating Snowdon a traitor or trying to jail Gary Mc Kinnon in the US when hes never set foot there....
NSA spies on everyone for a reason.... the info can be used to set up a psyop directed specifically at the whistleblower......and the technology to drive people mad is available....
Those whom the gods wish to destroy....they first make mad....

a reply to: stirling

One must ask then, where is Kratos from God of War when you need him? After all, when life gives you lemons, you make lemonade (or have really good catapult ammunition), so when the gods wish to destroy you... Kill the gods.

My sentiments exactly Brit.....
What else is there?

It depends on the subject and the whistleblower and how much credibility and airtime they get.

In the UFO world, Steven Greer seems to have been one of the most prolific, certainly in assembling a large network of alleged whistleblowers and putting on his show in Washington back in 2001. So many were introduced to various aspects of the alien/UFO memes from this network and were really into it, until not too long after Greer got more attention for branched-off networks to his over-all "agenda" which centered on puja and meditation and making contact with aliens on Mt. Shasta etc. That was such a huge turn-off to so many nuts and bolts UFO types, but I am not sure that was deliberate. Greer was already into all of that stuff way before.

However, his general notoriety from this "disclosure" movement basically created its own 'thing' with a life of its own. And since his intentions were supposedly always sincere and for saving the Earth or whatever, he was therefore vulnerable to having his very own conflicts of interest and bias. His CSETI expeditions then became his livelihood, and if no puja/shamanic UFO effect could be called forth, he was still under enormous pressure to come up with something for all those people who paid craploads of money to spend a weekend on a mountain with him. So then we get a lot of reaching and stretching and silly pictures of alleged ETs that go viral and make the entire archive of testimony, which he does not really represent as a person, look ridiculous. There are probably many cognitive thinking errors people like Greer made at the outset of their agenda that they overlooked and made the entire scheme futile. But since it has a life of its own, he needs to keep churning it out.

Likewise, Project Camelot and friends, who were directly inspired by Greer and friends, basically did the same thing on their own terms online. It started off honest and direct enough. 2 curious and snoopy buggers going around interviewing alleged whistleblowers. Perhaps with a slightly different agenda and set of insiders, but anyways. But then they needed to introduce a PayPal donation button to further fund their "work" - and there you have another New Age marketplace. Conferences, LiveStream pay-per-views, reaching and reaching. I am sure there is a lot of legitimate testimony sprinkled throughout both networks there, but you have to a lot of weeding!

So what the concensus implies is its either nuts to begin with or simply proceeds to go bonkers by the impetus and momentum....all by itself....?
Leaving the whistleblowing individual in a web of deceit whist trying to publicize their kernel of truth?

a reply to: stirling

Maybe.

But probably one size does not fit all...

a reply to: stirling

What says the forum ?

Do these nut cases need attention for their pet delusions?
many don't ask for money like Greer and others...some do have books for sale granted.....
But their claims run to some far out hypotheses....and they tend to grow...
(Im thinking of the binary code from rendlsham or other similar later developments)....

Are black ops agents driving the whistlebowers mad? Using black budget gadgets to send them into a sort of paranoid schitzophrenic state?
or are many simply that ways to start with?
Any evidence of either would be appreciated....

the indivduals had access to credible truths along with mind boggling bs for Years !.... the idea is to have them degenerate...so when & If they do become whistle-blowers they will have their stories collapse upon themselves after the real and lucid facts are revealed off-the-top of their memory~~~ all that's left in their brains is the bs data that makes them sound crazy

the whixsle blowers are in fact revealing the info & data they were deliberately fed... and came to believe was factual but in 'sorting' out the info the good/reasonable stuff was given first o that an aura of credibility was there... the human mind still stored all those 'IFFY' false notions, like insect beings with telepathic powers... which eventually come-out in the continuance of spilling information to the public or the 'authorities'...

its a built in fail-safe with the MK Ultra victims who might become whistle-blowers in some future scenario,,, they are programmed to self imposed rejection of their claims




THE ACE-IN-THE-HOLE the PTB have is they will never 'De-BRIEF' you as to which bits of intel or info (you have been subjected to over the years) are credible and which are just junk to clutter your memory of supposed 'classified' facts... so that your whistle blowing degenerates into sheer babble and far-out nonsense to others