It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When I say to someone wicked, ‘O wicked one, you will positively die! but you actually do not speak out to warn the wicked one from his way, he himself as a wicked one will die in his own error, but his blood I shall ask back at your own hand.
9 But as regards you, in case you actually warn someone wicked from his way [for him] to turn back from it but he actually does not turn back from his way, he himself will die in his own error, whereas you yourself will certainly deliver your own soul.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: Tangerine
I have listed the examples of people in peril, either drowning or in a burning home and how a human has a basic moral obligation to try to help them live and survive those situations, and you ask me why I can't understand, I pose the same question back to you ?
If you can't comprehend my perspective, I guess we have to agree to disagree.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
Or why do we even try ?
When people say that to me I think back to Noah. He preached for 120 years straight and didn't gain a single convert.
And Dumbledore ran Hogwarts.
You're a troll.
originally posted by: rokkuman
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
So many times on ATS people say I don't want to hear it. Or why do we even try ?
Yet for Christians who take the bible and Jesus words seriously, it something they feel compelled to do.
I think of proselytizing as advertisement campaign to win converts and that isnt a problem in itself because everybody has the right to promote what they believe. the problem is that christians advertise their religion dishonestly, they do so using only the nice bits of the bible and leave out the nasty bits.
you say "Jesus loves you he died for you blah blah" to portray Jesus as a nice guy but you leave out the bit about jesus ordering the deaths of those who opposed him and the "I came not to bring peace but a sword". you dont even touch upon these types of verses in your campaigns.
second christians are also extremely manipulative and play heavily on peoples emotions. saying "he died for you wont you accept him" is pure emotional blackmail 101.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: Tangerine
I have listed the examples of people in peril, either drowning or in a burning home and how a human has a basic moral obligation to try to help them live and survive those situations, and you ask me why I can't understand, I pose the same question back to you ?
If you can't comprehend my perspective, I guess we have to agree to disagree.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Tangerine
Oh I don't know. But I do know that most of society runs on an atheist perspective particularly when it comes to school, so if my rights end where yours begin ... then you should be very happy most of the time as your life is more or less free from religion.
But mine is not so happy as mine is more or less free from religion thanks to society's belief that this is fair.
You get your way most of the time, but I don't get mine except in private.
So stick a sock in it.
originally posted by: Hecate666
So christians have a moral obligation to warn us just like firefighters have the right to educate us about fire hazards?
These two things have nothing in common, because fire is a real danger and evidence can be seen everywhere.
However talking at me about your own belief and what you think could happen to me if I don't has no merit in reality [and that my religious friends is MY belief].
I see animals living fine lives without a god, I see religions that are not yours and they seem to be doing ok, I know that for thousands of years people believed in multiple gods and not yours lived quite nice lives, druids, buddhists, witches, tribes of the Amazon, tribes in Africa, Aboriginies in Australia. All these humans live without Jesus and they are doing ok.
This means that yours is just one of MANY, MANY belief systems, with no actual evidence.
Someone once said [sorry can't remember who]: "It's your hell, you go and burn in it."
In my reality there is no hell, nor armageddon, nor anything else. There are only humans [and they are bad enough]. Maybe you should try my reality for a change [but I won't hassle you]?
originally posted by: Michaelfunction
I don't think that Believers are so much afraid, and that's why they want to tell you about God and Christ.
I think its more lke seeing a great movie, or a new ride at the fair. They just want to share the experience with everybody.
I remember my friend when he became a believer, he wanted to tell me all about it, and everything was fine until he mentioned Jesus, at that moment I took offense, and ripped him a new one.
I later thought and wondered why I went off on him, and the only reason I could figure out was. That I had taken offense at the name of Christ. I had never really ever talked or heard about Jesus at that point in my life, nobody had ever told me about this. I think that name triggered something in my falling nature.
That's my thought on it.
Perhaps you haven't read the Constitution. We have a secular form of government.
is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a town ordinance's provisions making it a misdemeanor to engage in door-to-door advocacy without first registering with town officials and receiving a permit violates the First Amendment as it applies to religious proselytizing, anonymous political speech, and the distribution of handbills.
On June 17, 2002, the Court ruled in an 8–1 decision that the requirement of the Village of Stratton's ordinance for solicitors to "register" before engaging in door-to-door advocacy violated the First Amendment. The Court stated "it is offensive, not only to the values protected by the First Amendment, but to the very notion of a free society, that in the context of everyday public discourse a citizen must first inform the government of her desire to speak to her neighbors and then obtain a permit to do so."
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: Tangerine
Perhaps you haven't read the Constitution. We have a secular form of government.
Perhaps you haven't given the proper gravitas to the first amendment and how it applies to the passive rights of Christians which have been upheld in the supreme court of United States.
Even going so far as to rule Christians don't have to buy permits to preach.
Village of Stratton, 536 U.S. 150 (2002)
is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a town ordinance's provisions making it a misdemeanor to engage in door-to-door advocacy without first registering with town officials and receiving a permit violates the First Amendment as it applies to religious proselytizing, anonymous political speech, and the distribution of handbills.
On June 17, 2002, the Court ruled in an 8–1 decision that the requirement of the Village of Stratton's ordinance for solicitors to "register" before engaging in door-to-door advocacy violated the First Amendment. The Court stated "it is offensive, not only to the values protected by the First Amendment, but to the very notion of a free society, that in the context of everyday public discourse a citizen must first inform the government of her desire to speak to her neighbors and then obtain a permit to do so."
So if you want to disagree with the first amendment and the SCOTUS, that's your right of coarse.
But this only applies in America anyways, I would really like to see these standards rolled out into countries like North Korea and Muslim countries, that kill people as apostates, if they change from Muslim to Christian.
imagine hordes of Muslims, Wiccans, Satanists, Hindus and atheists pounding on your door and accosting you in public.
They called Peter and John and ordered them never to teach about Jesus or even mention his name.
19Peter and John answered them, "Decide for yourselves whether God wants people to listen to you rather than to him.
20We cannot stop talking about what we've seen and heard."
27 So they brought them and set them before the council (Sanhedrin). And the high priest examined them by questioning,
28 Saying, We definitely commanded and strictly charged you not to teach in or about this Name; yet here you have flooded Jerusalem with your doctrine and you intend to bring this Man’s blood upon us.
29 Then Peter and the apostles replied, We must obey God rather than men.
originally posted by: Hecate666
So christians have a moral obligation to warn us just like firefighters have the right to educate us about fire hazards?
These two things have nothing in common, because fire is a real danger and evidence can be seen everywhere.
However talking at me about your own belief and what you think could happen to me if I don't has no merit in reality [and that my religious friends is MY belief].
I see animals living fine lives without a god, I see religions that are not yours and they seem to be doing ok, I know that for thousands of years people believed in multiple gods and not yours lived quite nice lives, druids, buddhists, witches, tribes of the Amazon, tribes in Africa, Aboriginies in Australia. All these humans live without Jesus and they are doing ok.
This means that yours is just one of MANY, MANY belief systems, with no actual evidence.
Someone once said [sorry can't remember who]: "It's your hell, you go and burn in it."
In my reality there is no hell, nor armageddon, nor anything else. There are only humans [and they are bad enough]. Maybe you should try my reality for a change [but I won't hassle you]?
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
there is something should be said.. you (or at least I) feel the pull so strong to speak about Jesus and salvation to people that its like if you don't you will die, like when/if you try not to you feel as if your soul will split apart.. hard to describe.. but.. it just is..