Important -- how to in 10 sec shut up a ProVaccine person

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Denoli

originally posted by: deadeyedick

How many threads have come and gone that show how another cure for cancer has been found.



Very often these cures effectively work in lab test and on animals.



They all end up with the same big pharma fda fate.



How many of you bling vaccers have flagged those threads?



How can you blindly trust such systems that mostly stem from nazi tech and have been proven over and over again to be pushing many drugs on people they do not need or that often have side effects that are extremely bad for you and often trigger people to kill?



If you want to inject your body with stuff then you have the right.



Do any of you blind vaccers care about freedom and trust?

I will clap u

How much money has been donated to the cure for cancer !

What advances have we got from iss to better our lives ?

Answer = DOOMPORN !

The survival rate for cancer has increased by 20% over the last decade.

80% of childhood cancers are essentially cured.



That's not bad really is it?

In relation to the amount of cures that work yes it is still pretty bad.

It is equalivent to throwing us a bone and keeping the steaks for others.

They are raiding homes for having sodium clorite that has been responsible in one death at the most in our history.

Some doctors in the US are refusing to see children who are unvaccinated. I guess they are telling them to find another doctor or go to the emergency room and I don't blame them.

Not in my office, some doctors tell unvaccinated patients
In the wake of the multistate measles outbreak that has infected more than 100 Americans, some doctors refuse to see children whose parents won’t have them vaccinated.

Measles is highly contagious, spreading through the air and in enclosed spaces. In rare cases, especially among babies, it can be fatal. If a pregnant woman contracts measles, it can cause birth defects, miscarriage, or premature birth.

Physicians fear children who cannot be vaccinated because of age or health complications, or who may be among the small minority whose vaccinations do not provide adequate protection, will be put at risk in their waiting rooms if exposed to a child with measles.

“Parents who choose not to give measles shots, they’re not just putting their kids at risk, but they’re also putting other kids at risk, especially kids in my waiting room,” said Charles Goodman, a Los Angeles pediatrician.

Some parents are outraged that a doctor would refuse to see their unvaccinated children. Although no scientific evidence has shown a link, parents who refuse to vaccinate their children often worry the vaccines might cause autism or other developmental disorders.

Others parents say they are uncomfortable taking their young children to a clinic that doesn’t have such a ban.

a reply to: deadeyedick

They are raiding homes for having sodium clorite that has been responsible in one death at the most in our history.

Who are "they?" What homes are being raided?
www.ebay.com...

a reply to: Pardon?

I think that brings to light an interesting anti-vaxxer double standard. They measure the seriousness of diseases protected by vaccines on their mortality rate. At the same time they act like even the distant possibility of vaccines causing autism is the worst thing in the world. Last time I checked autism has never killed anyone while the flu kills thousands if not millions every year.

a reply to: grainofsand

The reply was not about my choice(whether for good or bad) it was about the BS that is parried about the reliability of these vaccines. When the only reliable information comes from the government or the medical profession and you find after the event that their information is erroneous that then begs the question "do I believe them next next time" on a more important vaccine.
That sir is the gamble and it is a gamble.

a reply to: Grimpachi

why should one go to a doc for the measles?

Did this happen or did they just state they would turn away patients?

a reply to: deadeyedick

You didn't read the article did you?


Let me ask if your child got a really bad persistant rash would you try to diagnose it yourself or take the child to a doctor?

a reply to: deadeyedick

Did this happen or did they just state they would turn away patients?

As posted:

In the wake of the multistate measles outbreak that has infected more than 100 Americans, some doctors refuse to see children whose parents won’t have them vaccinated.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Pardon?



I think that brings to light an interesting anti-vaxxer double standard. They measure the seriousness of diseases protected by vaccines on their mortality rate. At the same time they act like even the distant possibility of vaccines causing autism is the worst thing in the world. Last time I checked autism has never killed anyone while the flu kills thousands if not millions every year.

and the flu vaccine does not help those that die from getting the flu in the first place or else they would still be alive.

originally posted by: deadeyedick

If i were a mad man trying to poison you i would first gain your trust with a few cokies then after you got comfortable eating from my hand i would then give you a death cookie.

I'm approaching 60 and I'm more healthier than a 40 year old in the past. Humans are not only living longer but they are reaching older ages a lot more healthier and active, so I can't say their evil plans is working very well.

I am not saying that this is the case but i have trust issues and i put my faith in God.

Do you not sow your fields for food, or do you just sit back and have faith that God will feed you. Do you not fix a broken bone, or do you just pray for God to do it for you? You do these things for yourself because you know that God doesn't work that way, but then do not take medicines if you are sick, or even prevent really nasty diseases in the first place? God gave us brains to solve problems and a broken bone or diseases are problems that God will let us solve or suffer the results of not solving, just as he will not feed us if we do not sow first.

double post monster has struck...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick

Did this happen or did they just state they would turn away patients?

As posted:

In the wake of the multistate measles outbreak that has infected more than 100 Americans, some doctors refuse to see children whose parents won’t have them vaccinated.

That does not actually mean that anyone has been physically refused service when trying to see a doctor.

It means the doc decided if any want help they will not give it.

It is two different things.

and is likely to get license revoked if it happens.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick

They are raiding homes for having sodium clorite that has been responsible in one death at the most in our history.

Who are "they?" What homes are being raided?
www.ebay.com...

You buy a bag and instead of getting it in the mail they raid your house...geez Phage I always thought you were kind of smart....

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: deadeyedick

You didn't read the article did you?


Let me ask if your child got a really bad persistant rash would you try to diagnose it yourself or take the child to a doctor?

Yes, we are working through this one now.

Our son was sick earlier this week with all of what are the early symptoms of measles. They sent him home for daycare and we took him to the doctor. They diagnosed him with an ear infection and gave him Augmentin. Again, ear infection is an early symptom of measles.

Because he has been vaccinated, no one thought about that being possible.

However, today at the exact window when the rash shows up in measles, he wakes up covered head to toe with a rash that looks extremely similar to the measles rash. We didn't mess around. He has been around a bunch of other young children since he was sent home on Wednesday because he seemed to be getting better.

Turns out that it seems to be a side effect of the antibiotic. But would you have taken the chance?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: rickymouse

Actually efficacy studies done on a vaccine are done before the vaccine is released and have nothing to do with doctors reporting on who does or does not get measles after the fact.

Also, given the rapid rate of spread of this one outbreak, and the number of years we have gone without a substantial outbreak, I'd say the vaccine has been either doing its job or we have effectively managed to keep every measles infected person out of the country.

Evidently you have not investigated the changes in testing requirements by the FDA recently. They changed the testing requirements to try to bring costs down and shortening the pre-release testing times. They now let them test it out in the public with information received from doctors to evaluate effectiveness. This was done about ten or so years ago. I actually looked this up on the FDA site one day to check how new drugs side effects changed so much in as short as a year after they were released. I only had to read about twenty regulations to find this out. Trying to find it if you look for it might be looking for a needle in a haystack if you do not have something to guide you.

a reply to: Prezbo369

Read the post son. It worked on 3% of people where as usually it worked ("worked" like in past tense)on 50% of people.
Just use your search engine and put in "flu jab failure UK" and read to your hearts content at all the true facts and figures.

a reply to: rickymouse

Interesting, animal pharma is not allowed to do that and their regs are far less stringent.

a reply to: deadeyedick

and is likely to get license revoked if it happens.

Why?

Can private doctors refuse to treat patients?

The short answer is, yes. A private doctor isn't subject to the provisions of EMTALA, and can dismiss you as a patient at any time (barring discrimination), for just about any reason, without fear of credible legal reprisals. Doctors in private practice are basically small business owners. In a sense, a sign stating "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service" can be applied to doctors, as well as to your local restaurateur.

www.injuryclaimcoach.com...

originally posted by: deadeyedick

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick

Did this happen or did they just state they would turn away patients?

As posted:

In the wake of the multistate measles outbreak that has infected more than 100 Americans, some doctors refuse to see children whose parents won’t have them vaccinated.

That does not actually mean that anyone has been physically refused service when trying to see a doctor.

It means the doc decided if any want help they will not give it.

It is two different things.

and is likely to get license revoked if it happens.

Let me state this plainly.

You should read the article.

The guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics say doctors should bring up the importance of vaccinations during office visits. But, unless there is significant risk to a child, they should respect the parents’ wishes. If the doctor is no longer comfortable treating the patient, the guidelines allow termination of the physician-patient relationship.

No, they do not risk having their license revoked.


I think it is duplicitous for parents to be upset that a doctor will not accept them as a patient. The doctor recommended vaccinations the parents ignore the doctors advice. Why should a doctor keep a patient that will not listen to their medical advice?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: rickymouse

Interesting, animal pharma is not allowed to do that and their regs are far less stringent.

You mean they used to be far less stringent. An animal cannot tell you if they think the medicine is messing them up, and they have fur to cover the skin which makes it harder to see symptoms.