It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: onequestion
Sounds great but how does that really address the underlying employment issues? Small businesses need paying customers, paying customers need jobs to make money to pay small businesses for whatever and so on.
IMO, what we're looking at is the predictable product of globalization, advancements in technology (primarily automation) and the shift in the sources of income for the very wealthy (growth of the finance sector, shift to capital gains, etc) and since none of those things are likely to come to an end, we're going to need to get far more creative than helping people to start small businesses because there are only so many rungs on the ladder.
I'd start this discussion with what are we going to do we do about global wage equalization, skyrocketing income inequality, etc.
Small businesses need paying customers, paying customers need jobs to make money to pay small businesses for whatever and so on.
originally posted by: Edumakated
Cutting off welfare entirely would not be the disaster that people claim. What did people do prior to welfare? They got off their asses and worked and knew no one was going to pay for their mistakes.
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: onequestion
Workfare.
20 hours a week at the recycle center, daycare, whatever.
At least have some return on the crutch.
I once helped a couple get off the welfare system . It didn't require a lot of ingenuity but just helping them find their calling ,so to speak . It worked out great for them and they thanked me many times after for the little push . I also tried to get my family members involved in a joint effort in a business .That was a disaster and really caused more harm then any good . The money I lost was really not the issue but it was the trust that was broken that took it's toll .
originally posted by: Toadmund
originally posted by: Edumakated
Cutting off welfare entirely would not be the disaster that people claim. What did people do prior to welfare? They got off their asses and worked and knew no one was going to pay for their mistakes.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: swanne
You know that if a person or persons digs really deep they will find they don't need much energy . One of the things I have been thinking about is that we are able to make alcohol relativity cheep .It would be a great source for heat, lights and to even power a pump for water .Of course it might not be a good idea for a alcoholic lol But its these sort of simple solutions that could work in a community for the whole . It's when you start to think global that requires the big picture and that requires big bucks . Not really worth it imo . Let the big boys have their big toy's and let us little fish ,fish :>)
originally posted by: onequestion
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: onequestion
Workfare.
20 hours a week at the recycle center, daycare, whatever.
At least have some return on the crutch.
Welfare for work eliminates the need for the work they are doing to be done by paid employees.
It also gives the government to much control over the individual we want to go in the opposite direction.
If we want people to create their own business's they need a foundation to do it out of.
Oh, there are plenty of jobs (that are not getting done now or not being done in the US) that they can do!
originally posted by: onequestion
So I get caught between the idea of responsibility and a persons role within the community. I understand that in order to change your life that you need to understand what your doing wrong and correct that action. I also believe that there are times that no matter what you do you need to seek help from the community.
I don't think our current social programs really help people get on their feet. They are more like support systems. What we need is to enable individuals to create their own business's. Maybe we could create programs that eliminate taxes on small business's and fund small smaller business's for individuals with no resources rather then pay wealth-fare.
This will eliminate the lazyness from the system. We can then help people get what they need to survive themselves and make their own choices.
Why aren't we doing this as a nation for ourselves?
Stronger communities create stronger people. We need to work together and we need to do it in a way that works.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: FyreByrd
Where do you get the money for minimum guaranteed income?
Once you set that as the floor, how do guarantee that it doesn't get outpriced by the economy?
And what incentives do people have to work beyond the minimum?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: FyreByrd
So if I produce something, I get punished for it by having some of my reward for having produced it stolen from me? Why would I produce especially as I am guaranteed a minimum level of support in the first place?
Basically you are saying that if I grow tomatoes, I ought to lose one tomato for every five I grow just because I took the time and effort to grow them in the first place. Then I get to watch you distribute those tomatoes to others, some of whom will never bother to try to grow anything because I'm busy growing tomatoes like the sucker I am.
There is no joy in producing something only to watch the fruits of your labor go to someone who could do what you do but they choose not to because they know you will do it for them. That breeds resentment. This is why is also part of Marx that he who does not work shall not eat.
You're advocating all of the supposed perks of Marx without the stick to attempt to keep it in balance.